Email this article The Interplay of Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Critical Thinking in Predicting Reading Literacy: A Multivariate Analysis of Indonesian Elementary Students
), Violeta Inayah Pama(2), Nurhayati Nurhayati(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Department of Islamic Primary School Teacher, STAI Al-Kifayah Raiu, Indonesia
(2) Department of Islamic Primary School Teacher, STAI Al-Kifayah Raiu, Indonesia
(3) Department of Islamic Primary School Teacher, STAI Al-Kifayah Raiu, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
The Interplay of Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Critical Thinking in Predicting Reading Literacy: A Multivariate Analysis of Indonesian Elementary Students. The poor performance of Indonesian students in international tests such as PISA underscores the imperative of improving early reading competency. Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of motivation, self-efficacy, and critical thinking on reading literacy among elementary school students. Reading literacy is a fundamental skill for improving educational attainment and social performance. At the same time, motivation, self-efficacy, and critical thinking are identified as the fundamental psychological and cognitive factors influencing students' reading success. Methods: The study used a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design. The students in the population were selected using stratified random sampling to ensure the sample was as balanced as possible among the fifth-grade elementary school students who participated in the study. Standardized questionnaires assessing motivation and self-efficacy, as well as structured tests assessing critical thinking and reading literacy, were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test and multiple regression to examine the combined and partial effects of the predictors on reading literacy scores. Findings: Motivation, self-efficacy, and critical thinking concurrently accounted for 65% of the variance in students' academic performance, indicating a strong impact on reading literacy. Partial influence was found to have the greatest impact on self-efficacy (Beta=0.40), followed by motivation (Beta=0.35) and critical thinking (Beta=0.30). The results suggest that self-confidence, motivation, and critical thinking skills are associated with better literacy performance, as students are more likely to meet the minimum reading literacy level. Conclusion: The research also underscores the importance of integrating motivation, self-efficacy, and critical thinking into literacy instruction. Educators and curriculum developers should develop curricula and design learning programs that, through instruction, improve students' confidence, intrinsic motivation, and analytical thinking. These efforts will help strengthen reading literacy at the elementary school level, address literacy challenges that continue to plague Indonesia, and, in the long term, prepare students for academic and social success.
Keywords: self-efficacy, critical thinking, Motivation, reading literacy.
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What else matters besides strategies and skills? Reading Teacher, 66(6), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1146
Araújo, L., & Costa, P. (2023). Reading to young children: higher home frequency associated with higher educational achievement in PIRLS and PISA. Education Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121240
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
Boakye, N. A. N. Y. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and reading proficiency of first-year students: An exploratory study. Reading & Writing, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v6i1.52
Bobkina, J., & Stefanova, S. (2016). Literature and critical literacy pedagogy in the EFL classroom: Towards a model of teaching critical thinking skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.4.6
Cai, Y., & Chen, H. (2022). The fluctuating effect of thinking on language performance: new evidence for the island ridge curve. Language Assessment Quarterly, 19(5), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2080553
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
Chen, F., Sakyi, A., & Cui, Y. (2021). Linking student, home, and school factors to reading achievement: the mediating role of reading self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 41(10), 1260–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1953445
Dong, F., & Kula, M. C. (2023). Digital device use and scientific literacy: an examination using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 data. Education Economics, 31(3), 288–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2063797
Dowsett, P., & Reinertsen, N. (2023). Adding to teachers’ assessment toolboxes: multiple-choice assessments of critical literacy for Australian senior school courses. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 46(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00028-w
Farley, M. J., & Elmore, P. B. (2023). The relationship of reading comprehension to critical thinking skills, cognitive ability, and vocabulary for a sample of underachieving college freshmen. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004014
Ferri, V., Di Castro, G., & Marsiglia, S. (2023). Exploring immigrant gaps in education: empirical evidence. J-Reading, 1(2023), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.4458/5970-02
Govorova, E., Benítez, I., & Muñiz, J. (2020). How Schools Affect Student Well-Being: A Cross-Cultural Approach in 35 OECD Countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00431
Graham, S., Woore, R., Porter, A., Courtney, L., & Savory, C. (2020). Navigating the challenges of l2 reading: self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12670
Gumala, Y., Yohamintin, Farhana, H., Syaodih, E., & Samsudin, A. (2024). Development of an instrument to assess critical thinking skills for elementary school students on energy topics. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1725–1734.
Konrad, M. H. (2023). The love of the book: students’ text selection and their motivation to read. Reading Teacher, 77(3), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2246
Kuzu, Ç. İ., & Uras, M. C. (2018). The subjects that the pre-service classroom teachers perceive as difficult in elementary mathematics curriculum. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2153–2159. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061013
Locher, F. M., Becker, S., Schiefer, I., & Pfost, M. (2021). Mechanisms mediating the relation between reading self-concept and reading comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00463-8
Mohammadi, R. R., Saeidi, M., & Abdollahi, A. (2023). Modelling the interrelationships among self-regulated learning components, critical thinking and reading comprehension by PLS-SEM: A mixed methods study. System, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103120
Nevo, E., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2020). Oral reading fluency, reading motivation and reading comprehension among second graders. Reading and Writing, 33(8), 1945–1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10025-5
Orellana, P., Melo, C., Baldwin, P., De Julio, S., & Pezoa, J. (2020). The relationship between motivation to read and reading comprehension in Chilean elementary students. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2437–2458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10051-3
Ortlieb, E., & Schatz, S. (2020). Student’s Self-Efficacy in Reading–Connecting Theory to Practice. Reading Psychology, 41(7), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783146
Perry, L. B., Saatcioglu, A., & Mickelson, R. A. (2022). Does school SES matter less for high-performing students than for their lower-performing peers? A quantile regression analysis of PISA 2018 Australia. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00137-5
Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2012). Writing essays: Does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.621411
Quirk, M., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Webb, M. Young. (2009). A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(2), 196–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960902908467
Ronimus, M. M. S., Tolvanen, A. J., & Ketonen, R. H. (2023). Is there hope for first graders at the lowest percentiles? the roles of self-efficacy, task avoidance, and support in the development of reading fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 46(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487221086970
Rosado-Castellano, F., & Martín-Sánchez, M. (2023). Pedagogical importance of reading literacy: A comparative study on PISA. Aibi, Revista de Investigación Administración e Ingenierías, 11(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.3105
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
Smith, J. A., Bell, S. M., Philippakos, Z. A., & Park, Y. (2023). Investigating the relationship between perceptions of a “good reader” and reading performance among elementary and middle school students: an exploratory study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 39(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2092802
Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: a conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9
van der Sande, L., van Steensel, R., Fikrat-Wevers, S., & Arends, L. (2023). Effectiveness of interventions that foster reading motivation: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09719-3
Walker, B. J. (2003). The cultivation of student self-efficacy in reading and writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308217
Watkins, M. W., & Coffey, D. Y. (2004). Reading motivation: multidimensional and indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.110
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
Winberg, M., Tegmark, M., Vinterek, M., & Alatalo, T. (2022). Motivational aspects of students’ amount of reading and affective reading experiences in a school context: a large-scale study of grades 6 and 9. Reading Psychology, 43(7), 442–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2118914
Wuryaningsih, E. W., Lusmilasari, L., Haryanti, F., & Wahyuni, B. (2025). The Indonesian self-efficacy questionnaire for children: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation. Jurnal Ners, 20(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v20i1.64114
Yassin, E. (2024). Examining the relation of open thinking, critical thinking, metacognitive skills and usage frequency of open educational resources among high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101506
Yildirim, S., & Soylemez, Y. (2018). The effect of performing reading activities with critical reading questions on critical thinking and reading skills. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.326.335
You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2021). A closer look at US schools: What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015. Science Education, 105(2), 406–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609
Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Khon, M. (2025). What predicts undergraduates’ student feedback literacy? Impacts of epistemic beliefs and mediation of critical thinking. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(4), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268
Zhu, Y. (2022). Reading matters more than mathematics in science learning: an analysis of the relationship between student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2007552
No supplementary information available.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats