Email this article Metode Role Playing Dalam Pembelajaran Profesi Kependidikan (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Indraprasta PGRI)
) (1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2018 Anastasia Dewi Anggraeni
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
Role Playing Method in teaching profession learning. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the role playing method on student learning outcomes and activities. This research was conducted on the students of English Education Study Program of Indraprasta PGRI University in the first semester used Classroom Action Research (PTK) method, which was consisted of 65 students.. Data collected techniques used observation and evaluation. The results showed that the role playing method gave a significant influence in the lecturing education proffesion subject. In other words, the student’s learning outcomes and activity were increasing. These results can be seen from each cycle, 72% for the first cycle and 86% for the second cycle.
Keywords: role playing, educational profession
References
Blatner, A. (n.d.). Roleplaying. Wikipedia. Retrieved January 14, 2018, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/roleplaying
Bosse, H. M., Nickel, M., et al. (2015). Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: A comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect. BMC Medical Education, 10, 27.
Brislin, T. (2016). Active learning in applied ethics instruction. Journal on Excellence in College, 6(3), 161–167.
Brown, K. M. (2017). Using role-play to integrate ethics into the business curriculum: A financial management example. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 105–110.
Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., et al. (2015). Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 573–589.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2017). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 141–149.
Depdiknas. (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual (Contextual teaching and learning). Jakarta: Depdiknas PLP.
Hahn, S. R., Friedman, D. S., et al. (2010). Effect of patient-centered communication training on discussion and detection of nonadherence in glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 117(7), U1339–U1399.
Herkert, J. R. (2012). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.
Herkert, J. R. (2015). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–385.
Hudspith, R. (2013). Broadening the scope of engineering ethics—from micro-ethics to macro-ethics. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 11(4–5), 208–211.
Hudspith, R. C. (2013). Macroethics in an engineering program. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 13(5), 268–272.
Johnson, W. B., & Corser, R. (2012). Learning ethics the hard way: Facing the ethics committee. Teaching of Psychology, 25(1), 26–28.
Kasbolah, K. (2015). Penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Malang: Depdikbud Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.
Kopecky-Wenzel, M., & Frank, R. (2010). A video-based training in communication skills for physicians. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 59(3), 207–223.
Lloyd, P., & van de Poel, I. (2011). Designing games to teach ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 433–447.
Maier, H. R., Baron, J., et al. (2017). Using online roleplay simulations for teaching sustainability principles to engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(6), 1162–1171.
Margono, S. (2013). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Paskins, Z., & Peile, E. (2010). Final year medical students’ views on simulation-based teaching: A comparison with the Best Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review. Medical Teacher, 32(7), 569–577.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Raisner, J. A. (2017). Using the “ethical environment” paradigm to teach business ethics: The case of the maquiladoras. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12–13), 1331–1346.
Rosnow, R. L. (2014). Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 179–181.
Rusman. (2011). Model-model pembelajaran “Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru”. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Santoso. (2011). Model pembelajaran role playing. Jakarta.
Sardiman, A. M. (2012). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
Schellhorn, A., & Possl, J. (2010). Social skills training after brain injury—Patient satisfaction and outcome ratings by patients, relatives, and therapists. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 21(2), 71–81.
Siagian, S. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Silberman, M. (Ed.). (2007). The handbook of experiential learning. San Francisco: Wiley/Pfeiffer.
Springer, L., Stanne, M., et al. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–52.
Uno, H. B. (2008). Profesi kependidikan: Problema, solusi, reformasi, pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Van de Poel, I. R., Zandvoort, H., et al. (2016). Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: Contents, educational setup and experiences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(2), 267–282.
Wendra. (2007). Penulisan karya ilmiah buku ajar (tidak diterbitkan). Bali: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia.
Wiriaatmadja, R. (2015). Metode penelitian tindakan kelas untuk meningkatkan kinerja guru dan dosen. Bandung: PPS UPI.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats