EFEKTIVITAS MODEL DIRECT LEARNING DAN STAD DITINJAU DARI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA

agung putra wijaya(1,Mail)

(1) , Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

Copyright (c) 2016 agung putra wijaya
Article Metrics→
  
Indexing Database→



Download Full Text: PDF

Abstract

The Efectiveness of Direct Learning and STAD Model Viewed by Mathematical Conceptual Understanding of Students. This quasi experimental research was aimed to know the efectiveness of direct learning and STAD model viewed by mathematical conceptual understanding on field dependent students. The population of this research was all students of grade eight of SMPN 1 Natar Lampung Selatan. The sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique. This research used pretest-posttest control group design. The result of this research showed that on field dependent students, direct learning model was more effective than STAD model viewed by students’ mathematical conceptual understanding.

 

Keywords: field dependent, conceptual understanding, direct learning, STAD

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v6.i1.201601


References

Adesoji, F. A. & Ibraheem, T. A. (2009). Effects of Student Teams Achievement Divisions Strategy and Mathematics Knowledge on Learning Outcomes in Chemical Kinetics. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(6), 15–25.

Arends, R. (1998). Learning to Teach (Fourth Edition). Singapura: McGraw-Hill.

Budiyono. (2009). Statistik Untuk Penelitian (Edisi Kedua). Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Desmita. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Furchan. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian dalam Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Guisande, M. A., Paramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Amelia, L. (2007). Field Dependent–Independent (FDI) Cognitive Style: An Analysis of Attentional Functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572–577.

Isjoni, H. (2010). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kepner, M. D., & Neimark, E. D. (1984). Test-retest Reliability and Differential Pattern of Score Change on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1405–1413.

Moertiningsih. (2011). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw yang Dimodifikasi Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Grobogan Tahun 2010/2011. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Mullis, I. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. [Online]. Tersedia di: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu [Diakses 21 November 2014].

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Result In Focus. [Online]. Tersedia di: http://www.oecd.org [Diakses 20 November 2014].

Setiawan, W. (2010). Penerapan Model Pengajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak (RPL). Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (PTIK), 3(1), 7–10.

Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. (Narulita Yusron, penerjemah). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sudrajat, A. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction). [Online]. Tersedia di: http://akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com [Diakses 01 Juni 2013].

Zakaria, E., Chin, L. C., & Daud, M. Y. (2010). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics. Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 272–277.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats