Factual Text Genre: Analysis of the Ability of High School Teachers in Developing Learning Tools


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA Jakarta, Indonesia


Metrics→ |
Indexing Site→ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Copyright (c) 2020 Imam Safi’i, Wini Tarmini, Hamzah Puadi Ilyas
Factual Text Genre: Analysis of the Ability of High School Teachers in Developing Learning Tools. Objective: This study aims to describe the ability of Indonesian language teachers in Banten Provision in designing factual text genre. Method: The method was content analysis. The research sample was taken purposively through the XII grade. Indonesian Language Lesson Plan Module compiled. Data collection and analysis were done by measuring the relevance of data categorization in terms of genre pedagogical, genre scientific, and the completeness of the evaluation instrument. Findings: The average ability of teachers in describing learning with genre pedagogical approach was 67%; the ability of teachers in describing genre scientific methods was 83%; the ability of teachers in making assessment instruments based on the genre of text was 50%. Conclusion: Teachers’ competence in designing textual genre-based learning was not optimal. The results of this study can be utilized as an assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of Indonesian language learning based on the text genre.
Keywords: factual text genre, high school teacher, content analysis
DOI: 10.23960/jpp.v10.i2.202008
Agustina, ES (2017). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Teks: Representasi Kurikulum 2013 [Text-Based Indonesian Language Learning: Representation of 2013 Curriculum]. Aksara, 18 (1). 84-99.
Asher, Z., & Batool, S. (2017). Emotionalized learning experiences: Tapping into the affective domain. Evaluation and Program Planning, 62, 35–48.
Bensley, DA, Rainey, C., Murtagh, MP, Flinn, JA, Maschiocchi, C., Bernhardt, PC, & Kuehne, S. (2016). Closing the assessment loop on critical thinking: The challenges of multidimensional testingand lowtest-taking motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 158–168.
Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2018). Implicit communication in the ultimatum game. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 77, 11-19.
Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2014). Striving to connect and striving to learn: Influences of relational and mastery goals for teaching on teacher behavior and student interest and help seeking. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 41–53.
Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Edu- cation, 125, 226-239.
Del Percio, A. (2016). The governmentality of migration: Intercultural communication and the politics of (dis) placement in Southern Europe. Language & communica- tion, 51, 87-98.
Erkens, M., & Bodemer, D. (2019). Improving collaborative learning: Guiding knowledge exchange through the provision of information about learning partners and learning contents.Computers & Education, 128, 452-472.
Ernst-Slavit, G., & Pratt, KL (2017). Teacher questions: Learningthe discourse of science in a linguistically diverse elementary classroom. Linguistics and Education, 40, 1–10.
Eva, KW (2018). Journal of Applied Research in Memoryand Cognition Cognitive Influences on Complex Performance Assessment: Lessons from the Interplay between Medicine and Psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7 (2), 177–188.
Fischer, M., & Sliwka, D. (2018). Games and Economic Behavior Confidence in knowledge or confidence in the ability to learn: An experiment on the causal effects of beliefs on motivation. Games and Economic Behavior, 111, 122–142.
Gebre, EH, & Polman, JL (2020). From “context” to “active contextualization” : Fostering learner agency in contextualizing learning through science news reporting.Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100374.
Hartini, R. F., Ibrohim, I., & Qohar, A. (2018). Pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan proses sains melalui inkuiri terbimbing berbasis lingkungan pada materi ekosistem. [Understandingof Concepts and Science Process Skills through Guided Inquiry Based on the Environment on Ecosystem Materials]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3 (9), 1168-1173
Heijltjes, A., van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F. (2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions on economics students’ reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31–42.
Ting, DH, & Cheng, CFC (2017). Measuring the marginal effect of pro-environmental behavior: Guided learning and behavioral enhancement. Journal of hospitality, leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 20, 16-26.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2016). Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi [Curriculum 2013 Revised Edition].
Kusumaningsih, D. (2013). Indonesian Text Role As Draft Science in Curriculum 2013: Assessment Introduction to Text Structure Strategies in an Indonesian Book. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2 (4), 288–291.
Lo, YY, & Jeong, H. (2018). Impact of genre- based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Linguistics and Education, 47, 36–46.
Mahsun MS (2014). Teks dalam Pemebelajran Bahasa Indonesia (Kurikulum 2013). [Texts in Indonesian Language Learning (2013 Curriculum]. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nurdyansyah & Musfiqon. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik. [Scientific Learning Approach]. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2014). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi [Competency Based Language Learning Assessment]. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Phelps, R., Thi, H., Nhung, T., Graham, A., & Geeves, R. (2012). But how do we learn? Talking to Vietnamese children about how theylearn in and out of school. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 289-302.
Safi’i, I & Muljono, H. (2018). Pelatihan Pembelajaran dengan Strategi Critical Thinking Question [Learning Training with Critical ThinkingQuestion Strategies]. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat, 2 (1), 1-12.
Saputro, D., Santoso, T., Sabardila,A., & Prayitno, HJ (2019). Dimensi Perubahan Pembelajaran Wacana dalam Buku Teks Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi 2014 dan 2017. [Dimensions of Changing Discourse Learning in Indonesian Language Learning Textbooks 2013 Curriculum 2013 and 2017]. Revised Edition Proceeding of The URECOL, 229-235.
Setiawati, S. (2018). Penggunaan Media Reading Box dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Teks. [The Use of Reading Box Media in Text-Based Indonesian Language Learning]. In Pesona: Pekan Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 1 (1), 35-41. Sluijsmans, D., & Prins, F. (2006). A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32 (1), 6-22.
Sufairoh. (2016a). Pendekatan Saintifik & Model Pembelajaran K-13. [Scientific Approach & Learning Model K-13]. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 5 (3), 116–125.
NguyÅn, T. M. T., & NguyÅn, T. T. L. (2017). Influence of explicit higher-order thinking skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 113-127.
Topu, F. B., & Goktas, Y. (2019). The effects of guided-unguided learning in 3d virtual environment on students’ engagement and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 1-10.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats