Inquiry Social Complexity-Based Chemistry Module to Empower Critical and Creative Thinking Skills

Ryzal Perdana(1,Mail), Yasser Wahyudin(2)

(1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Université de Lyon, France

MailCorresponding Author

Copyright (c) 2025 Ryzal Perdana, Yasser Wahyudin
Article Metrics→


Download Full Text: PDF

Abstract

The Validity of the Chemistry Module Based on Inquiry Social Complexity (ISC) to Empower Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) Skills. A study has been conducted on the validity of the inquiry social complexity (ISC) based learning module to empower students' critical and creative thinking skills. The research method uses descriptive methods. The learning modules developed are validated and evaluated. Validation is carried out for experts in the fields of language, material, design, and learning instruments. While the evaluation phase is given to teachers and students, this is because teachers and students are directly involved in the implementation of the ISC module. So it is expected that the ISC module evaluation results can be objective. ISC module evaluation given to teachers and students consists of four aspects, namely Content, Language, Presentation, and Graphic. The assessment criteria consist of a scale of 4, while the assessment by experts and evaluators uses a Likert 4 scale. The results of the language expert assessment, material, design, and evaluation of learning are in the excellent category. Student assessment results are in the very good category, and teacher ratings are in a good category.

 

Keywords: inquiry social complexity (isc), modules, critical thinking, creative thinking, chemistry.


References

Afandi., & Sajidan. (2017). Stimulasi Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (1st ed.). Surakarta: UNS Press.

Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2019). The correlation of character education with critical thinking skills as an important attribute to success in the 21 st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012132

Anna, C., Bob, J., & Mike, L. (2001). Creativity in Education. New York: Continuum.

Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (2001). Analyzing Explanations for Seemingly Irrational Choices : Linking Argument Analysis and Cognitive Science. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 15(2), 267–287.

Facione, N., & Facione, P. A. (n.d.). Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in the Health Sciences: A Teaching Anthology. Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment, 1–9.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. 1998. Insight Assessment, Pearson Education, 9, 1–28.

Lee, T. T., & Osman, K. (2012). Interactive Multimedia Module in the Learning of Electrochemistry: Effects on Students’ Understanding and Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.295

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Litera.

Nastiti, D., Rahardjo, S. B., Elfi Susanti, V. H., & Perdana, R. (2018). The need analysis of module development based on search, solve, create, and share to increase generic science skills in chemistry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12393

Perdana, R., Budiyono, Sajidan, Sukarmin, & Atmojo, I. R. W. (2019). A conceptual of teaching models inquiry-based social constructivism (IbSC). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1).

Riduwan. (2008). Skala Pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for life in our times. Sanfransisco. Jossey-Bass, 256.

Vembriarto, S. (1975). Pengantar Pengajaran Modul. Yogyakarta.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press.

Winkel. (2009). Psikologi Pengajaran (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.

Zivkovil, S. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232 (April, 102–108.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats