Email this article Analysis of Argumentation Contents in the High School Biology Textbook: A Discourse Analysis on the Topic of the Respiratory System
), Slamet Suyanto(2) (1) Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
(2) Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2025 Ria Rosliana, Slamet Suyanto
| Article Metrics→ |
Abstract
Analysis of Argumentation Contents in the High School Biology Textbook: A Discourse Analysis on the Topic of the Respiratory System. Objectives: Study examines structure of learning discourse, explores aspects of discussion, examines presentation of learning motives in textbooks, analyzes a comparison of three biology textbooks on respiratory materials. Methods: A qualitative investigation of descriptive text kinds from late-XI biology textbooks, discourse structure analysis tasks, conversational type elements, learning motive explanations. Findings: Publishers: Erlangga, Yrama Widya, Intan Pariwara. Conclusion: Results revealed nature of conversation structure. Three scientific books observed that one side of the argument swamped any remaining sections of debate due to a rapid review of doubtful material. Examining three books analysed reveals a discussion of many quality,rating issues. In Good category, Book B got highest rating of 8.3. Book C received an 8.2 on the "upside" scale, whereas Book A received a 7 on the "appropriate" scale.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202206
References
Aufschnaiter, V. A., Eduran, S, Osborne, J. & Simon S. (2007). Argumentation and The Learning of Science. Dalam Pinto R., Causo, D (Eds), Contribution for Science Education Research. London: Springer.
Anagnostopolou. K. Hatzinikita & Christidou, V.(2012) PISA and Biology Scholl Textbooks: the Role of Visual Material.
Bell, P. & Linn, M. C. (2007). Scientific Argument as Learning Artifact, Designning for Learning from The Web With KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8):797-817.
Bricker, L. A. & Bell, P. 2008. Conceptualizations of Argumentation From Science Studies and The Learning Sciences and Their Implications for The Practices of Science Education. Science Education, 92 (3): 473-498.
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (6): 837-861.
Erduran, S., Jimenez, M. P., & Aleixandre. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. University of Bristol: Springer
Erduran, S., Simon, & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPing Into Argumen : Development In The Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 915-933.
Elin Bistrom & Ragnar Lundstrom. (2021). Textbooks and action competence for sustainable development: an analysis of Swedish lower secondary level textbooks in geography and biology, Environmental Education Research, 27:2, 279-294.
Fotakopoulou, D, & Spiliotopoulou, V. (2008). Visual Representations in Secondary School Texbooks of Economis. International Conference on Applied Economics-ICOAE
Jaber, L.Z. & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to Feel Like a Scientist. Science Education, (100):189–220.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S., (2007) Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview. In S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.). Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp3-27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Herlanti Y., Rustaman, N.Y. Rohman, A. Fitriani. (2012). Kualitas Argumentasi Pada Diskusi Isu Sosiosaintifik Mikrobiologi Melalui Weblog [ Quality of Argumentation on Discussion of Socioscience Microbiological Issues Through Weblog ]. DoubleClick: Indonesian IPA Education Journal, JPII, 1 (2) (2012) 168-177.
Katchevich, D. Hofstein, A.& Naaman, R. (2011). Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory:Inquiry and Confirmatory Experiments. Research Sains Education.43:3
Katchevich, D. Naaman,R. & Hofstein, A. (2014). The Characteristics of Open – Ended Inquary-Type Chemistry Experiments That Enable Argumentative Discourse. Sisyphus Journal of Education. 2: 74 – 99
Macagno, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Kuhn, D. (2015). Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students’ Argumentative Strategies. Topoi 34:523–537.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing The Quality of Argumentation in Science Clasrooms. Journal of Reseach in Science TeachingTeaching, 994-1020.
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Argumentation as an Object of Interest and as a Social and Cultural Resource, Argumentation and Education. Dalam N. Muller Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), New York: Springer US.
Sampson, V. & Gleim, L.(2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71 (8): 465-472
Sampson, V. E., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments , An Exploratory Study. Science Education. 95: 217 - 257.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J. & Walker, J.P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Part Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education. 95(2): 217-257.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Supportsfor Science Inquiry. Science Education, 88: 345-372.
Siswanto, Kaniawati, & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penenrapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik untuk Menigkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa [Formulation of Argument Generation Learning Models Using Scientific Methods to Improve Students' Cognitive Abilities and Argument Skills]. DoubleClick : Journal of Physics Education Indonesia, 104-116.
Syaifudin, A., & Pratama, H. (2013). Pengembangan Buku Teks Menulis Argumentasi Berdasarkan Pola Penalaran Argumentatif. [Book Development of Writing Argumentation Based on Argumentative Reasoning Patterns]. DoubleClick: Journal of Educational Research, 30 (1): 1-10.
Schleigh, S. P., Bossè, M. J., & Lee, T. (2011). Redefining curriculum integration and professional development: Inservice teachers as agents of change. Current Issues in Education, 14 (3).
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering Students’ Knowledge And Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas In Human Genetics. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 39: 35-62.
Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford. B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding Preservice Science Teacher Evidence-Based Arguments During 29 an Investigation of Natural Selection. Research in Science Education, 32 (4), 437-463.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats