Al-Qadri, A. R., Alhaq, P. M., Muthmainnah, N., Irpadilla, M. A., Herlina, H., Aulia, N., & Scholten, A. R. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMAN 1 Gowa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Instrumen Three Tier Diagnostic Test[Analysis of Misconceptions of Class XI Students of SMAN 1 Gowa on Buffer Solution Material Using the Three Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument]. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 7(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.26858/jnp.v7i1.9388

Andayani, Y., Hadisaputra, S., & Hasnawati, H. (2018). Analysis of the level of conceptual understanding. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1095, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1095/1/012045

Azizah, U., & Nasrudin, H. (2018). Empowerment of metacognitive skills through development of instructional materials on the topic of hydrolysis and buffer solutions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 953, No. 1, p. 012199). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012199

Bain, K., Rodriguez, J. M. G., Moon, A., & Towns, M. H. (2018). The characterization of cognitive processes involved in chemical kinetics using a blended processing framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00230K

Christian, K., & Talanquer, V. (2012). Modes of reasoning in self-initiated study groups in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20010D

Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010). Student-generated submicro diagrams: A useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005464J

Dean, R. L. (2002). It's laboratory class time. Do you know what your buffer is doing?. The American biology teacher, 64(8), 620-627. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2002)064[0620:ILCTDY]2.0.CO;2

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26

Dori, Y. J., & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 278-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10077

Drastisianti, A., Susilaningsih, E., Wijayati, N., Nada, E. I., & Alawiyah, N. (2019). Analysis of student concept understanding on the material of buffer solution using three-tier test assisted by multiple representation teaching materials. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1321, No. 2, p. 022050). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/0.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022050

Gani, A., Khaldun, I., & Bahi, M. (2018, September). The development of a module with Microsoft Excel-based interactive media on the topic of buffer solution. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012119). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012119

Gilbert, J. K. (1977). The study of student misunderstandings in the physical sciences. Research in Science Education, 7(1), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02643123

Gultom, M., Fitriyani, D., Paristiowati, M., & Rahmawati, Y. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi pada materi Larutan Penyangga menggunakan two-tier diagnostic test [Analysis of misconceptions in the Buffer Solution material using a two-tier diagnostic test]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 9(2), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.092.01

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Herga, N. R., Čagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 593-608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a

Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah, N., & Elvinawati, E. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa [Analysis of Students' Misconceptions Using Cri-Assisted Essay Diagnostic Test (Certainty of Response Index) on Acid-Base Subject]. Alotrop, 5(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v5i1.16487

Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding Mental Models of Dilution in Thai Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(2), 147-168.

Kartini, K. S., & Putra, I. N. T. A. (2020). Respon siswa terhadap pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis android [Student response to the development of Android-based interactive learning media]. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v4i1.24981

Kuhn, D. (2007). Reasoning about multiple variables: Control of variables is not the only challenge. Science Education, 91(5), 710-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20214

Kusumaningrum, I. A., Ashadi, A., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2017). Scientific approach and inquiry learning model in the topic of buffer solution: a content analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012042). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012042

Laeli, C. M. A. H. (2021). Development of Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconception and Improve Critical Thinking Skill in Science Learning. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.21

Luviani, S. D., Mulyani, S., & Widhiyanti, T. (2021). A review of three levels of chemical representation until 2020. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012206). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012206

Maksum, M. J., Sihaloho, M., & La Kilo, A. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman siswa pada konsep larutan penyangga menggunakan three tier multiple choice tes [Analysis of students' understanding of the concept of buffer solution using a three tier multiple choice test]. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 12(1), 47-53.

Miedema, D., Aivaloglou, E., & Fletcher, G. (2022). Identifying SQL misconceptions of novices: findings from a think-aloud study. ACM Inroads, 13(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469759

Milenkovic, D. D., Hrin, T. N., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a three-tier test as a valid diagnostic tool for identification of misconceptions related to carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514-1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261

Masykuri, M., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2018). Student Certainty Answering Misconception Question: Study of Three-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test in Acid-Base and Solubility Equilibrium. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1006, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012018

Mellyzar, M. (2021). Analysis of Understanding Chemical Bond Concepts in Students with Three-Tier Multiple Choice. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 3(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2021.3.1.7560

Nurhidayatulah, N., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Miskonsepsi materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.10029

Nurhujaimah, R., Kartika, I. R., & Nurjaydi, M. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Instrumen Tes Three Tier Multiple Choice [Analysis of Misconceptions of Class XI High School Students on Buffer Solution Material Using a Three Tier Multiple Choice Test Instrument]. Paedagogia, 19(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v19i1.36090

Orgill, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perceptions of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems. Chemistry education research and practice, 9(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806229N

Pan, M. A., Marfu’ah, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2021, March). The effect of the argument-driven inquiry (ADI) based on science, environment, technology, and society (SETS) to students’ concept understanding and scientific argument skill in buffer solution learning: Studied from cognitive style. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1, p. 020038). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043621

Permana, I. (2013). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa sma kelas x pada mata pelajaran fisika melalui Cri (certainty of response index) termodifikasi [Analysis of the misconceptions of class X senior high school students in physics subject through modified Cri (certainty of response index)]. Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Pimta, S., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Factors Influencing Mathematic Problem-Solving Ability of Sixth Grade Students. Online Submission, 5(4), 381-385.

Ratna. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas XI IPA pada Pokok Bahasan Larutan Penyangga di SMAN 3 Lapandewa. Kendari: Universitas Halu Oleo.

Salame, I. I., Ramirez, L., Nikolic, D., & Krauss, D. (2022). Investigating Students' Difficulties and Approaches to Solving Buffer Related Problems. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 911-926. . https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15152a

Sausan, I., Saputro, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Chemistry for beginners: What makes good and bad impression. In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018) (pp. 42-45). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.11

Schmidt-McCormack, J. A., Judge, J. A., Spahr, K., Yang, E., Pugh, R., Karlin, A., ... & Shultz, G. V. (2019). Analysis of the role of a writing-to-learn assignment in student understanding of organic acid–base concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(2), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00260F

Schwedler, S., & Kaldewey, M. (2020). Linking the submicroscopic and symbolic level in physical chemistry: how voluntary simulation-based learning activities foster first-year university students’ conceptual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1132-1147. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00211A

Siswaningsih, W., & Widasmara, R. (2019). Development of Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconception of Chemical Equilibrium. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 3, p. 032019). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032019

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview.Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi,4(2), 1-20. https://dspace.alquds.edu/handle/20.500.12213/742

Sözbilir, M. (2004). What makes physical chemistry difficult? Perceptions of Turkish chemistry undergraduates and lecturers. Journal of chemical education, 81(4), 573. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p573

Suprapto, N. (2020). Do we experience misconceptions?: An ontological review of misconceptions in science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24

Syahri, W., Yusnaidar, Y., Muhaimin, M., & Habibi, A. (2021). Effectiveness of Multimedia Based on Multiple Representation of Hess' Law: Concept and Skills of Pre-Service Science Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14326a

Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: some considerations from educational research. Chemistry education research and practice, 2(2), 123-158. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E

Treagust, D., Nieswandt, M., & Duit, R. (2000). Sources of students difficulties in learning Chemistry. Educación química, 11(2), 228-235.

Utami, R. E., Ekawati, C., & Handayanto, A. (2020). Profil kemampuan berpikir aljabar dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif siswa smp. JIPMat. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 13-24.

Wu, H. K. (2003). Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real‐life experiences: Intertextuality in a highschool science classroom. Science education, 87(6), 868-891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10090

Yani, F. H., Mawardi, M., & Js, A. F. R. (2020). The effectiveness of guided inquiry student worksheet to improve high order thinking skill in buffer solution material. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1481, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing.

Yaman, F. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ development and use of multiple levels of representation and written arguments in general chemistry laboratory courses. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2331-2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9781-0

Zbiek, R. M., & Larson, M. R. (2015). Teaching strategies to improve algebra learning. The Mathematics Teacher, 108(9), 696-699.