Email this article Source-Based Inquiry Learning to Improve University Students’ Historical Literacy in South Asian History
This study examined the effectiveness of source-based inquiry learning in improving university students' historical literacy in a South Asian History course. Historical literacy was conceptualized through students' abilities in sourcing, contextualization, corroboration, and evidence-based historical argumentation. A quantitative quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design involved 58 fourth-semester history education students. The experimental group comprised 29 students who received source-based inquiry learning, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected using a source-based historical literacy essay test and analyzed through descriptive statistics, an independent-samples t-test, analysis of covariance, and normalized gain analysis. The experimental group achieved a higher posttest mean than the control group (78.93 vs. 64.90) and a greater improvement (28.15 vs. 14.48 points). The between-group difference was statistically significant, t(56) = 6.79, p < 0.001. Analysis of covariance confirmed a significant treatment effect after controlling for pretest scores, F(1, 55) = 110.82, p < 0.001, with a large effect size (0.668). The experimental group obtained a moderate normalized gain of 0.58, compared with 0.30 in the control group, which lay at the lower boundary of the low category. Sourcing and contextualization showed the greatest improvement. Source-based inquiry learning effectively strengthens historical literacy and disciplinary reasoning. Its integration into university history education can support more analytical, contextual, critical, and evidence-centered learning.
Keywords: source-based inquiry learning, historical literacy, history education, primary historical sources, historical thinking.
Åhsberg, C. S. (2024). Students’ views of historical significance – a narrative literature review. History Education Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.21.1.02
Ana Isabel, M., & Barca, I. (2024). Historical narratives: how Portuguese students aged 10 and 15 make use of national history. History Education Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.21.1.10
Barreiro, A., & Pérez-Manjarrez, E. (2025). Collective memory, moral judgments, and history education. In Current Opinion in Psychology (Vol. 66). Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102113
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of Historical Reasoning Instruction and Writing Strategy Mastery in Culturally and Academically Diverse Middle School Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
Fadkhurosi, A. (2023). Analisis Pearson Product Moment dan Alpha Cronbach dalam Pengembangan Need Assesment Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Muria Research Guidance and Counseling (MRGC), 2(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.24176/mrgc.v2i1.9451
Gibson, L., Peck, C. L., Miles, J., & Duquette, C. (2025). Historical thinking: Trends, critiques, and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 65, 102088. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102088
Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & READI, P. (2016). Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 1(68), 64–74. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441679.pdf
Harnes, H. B. (2025). What can empirical research tell us about how to develop students’ historical empathy? A scoping review. History Education Research Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.22.1.18
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Vol. 3). The Guilford Press.
Hidayati, R., Kusmanto, A. S., & Kiswantoro, A. (2023). Development and Construct Validation of Indonesian Students Self-Confidance Scale Using Pearson Product Moment. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(3 SE-Article), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.03.11
Karn, S. (2024). Designing historical empathy learning experiences: a pedagogical tool for history teachers. History Education Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.21.1.06
Kim, W., Dean, D., Janet, D., Renee, P.-M., & Elizabeth, P. (2023). A systematic review of pedagogical interventions on the learning of historical literacy in schools. History Education Research Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.20.1.09
Kumalasari, D., Gunartati, G., Wilis, R., Dewi, I. M., & Yudi, S. (2025). Enhancing historical literacy and critical thinking through primary source-based inquiry: evidence from the jogja library center tour dyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(03), 2028–2048. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i3.pp2028-2048
Lionar, U., Mulyana, A., Sapriya, Winarti, M., Yefterson, R. B., Syafrina, Y., Naldi, H., & Yuhardi. (2025). Investigating local historical figures: the implementation of the pjbl model to increase historical literacy. Paramita, 35(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v35i1.23411
Miralles-Sánchez, P., Rodríguez-Medina, J., & Gómez-Carrasco, C. J. (2025). Historical thinking and teacher discourse in secondary education: an exploratory observational study. In Education Sciences (Vol. 15, Issue 3, p. 394). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030394
Nayeri, N. D., Noodeh, F. A., Nia, H. S., Yaghoobzadeh, A., & Goudarzian, A. H. (2024). Statistical procedures used in pretest-posttest control group design: a review of papers in five iranian journals. Acta Medica Iranica, 61(10 SE-Review Article(s)). https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i10.15657
Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Singh, C. K. S., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N. A., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415
Puspito, D. R. A., Supardi, K. I., & Sulhadi Sulhadi. (2021). The influence of guided inquiry models on science process skills dhimas. Journal of Primary Education, 10(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i3.39442
Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a Historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
Smets, W. (2024). Four design principles for student learning of substantive historical concepts – a realistic review study. History Education Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.21.1.04
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education, Vol. 55 (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Syah, M. A., Mulyani, F. F., Wijayadi, W., & Arfaton, A. (2025). Research trends in history education on historical thinking in Indonesia, 2019-2024: A systematic literature review and bibliometric. Agastya: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pembelajarannya, 15(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.25273/ajsp.v15i2.21073
Tirado-Olivares, S., Czar-Gutiérrez, R., García-Olivares, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2021). Active learning in history teaching in higher education: The effect of inquiry-based learning and a student response system-based formative assessment in teacher training. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7087
Tribukait, M. (2024). History education as prevention: the topic of right-wing extremism in German educational media. History Education Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.21.1.12
VanSledright, B. (2015). What does it mean to think historically . . . and how do you teach it? Social Studies Today: Research and Practice: Second Edition, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726885-24
Wijaya, A. M., Satriya, R. N., & Arifin, I. F. (2026). Reconstructing Gen Z digital historical literacy through AI- based pedagogy in higher education. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 13(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v13i1.93395
Wijaya, T., Alauwiyah, F., & Pahlevi, M. R. (2025). Utilization of primary sources in history learning : teachers ’ efforts to improve high school students ’ historical literacy. J-PIPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial), 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/jpips.v12i1.37197
Wineburg, S. (2010). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi Delta Kappan 80, 488–499. kappanmagazine.org
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats