Beyond Curiosity: The Role of Inquisitiveness in Managing Epistemic Uncertainty and Problem-Solving Difficulties among Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
Country:
(1) Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia
(2) Mathematics Education, STKIP PGRI Pacitan, Indonesia
This study investigates the relationship between inquisitiveness and problem-solving difficulties among pre-service elementary school teachers when solving mathematical problems containing contradictory information. The aim is to identify how different levels of inquisitiveness influence cognitive, metacognitive, and affective difficulties and to provide a deeper explanation of how these difficulties emerge during the reasoning process. A qualitative descriptive case study was conducted with 33 fifth-semester students in the Elementary Teacher Education program at Universitas PGRI Madiun. Data were collected through problem-solving tests, think-aloud, and interviews. Students were categorized into high, medium, and low inquisitiveness groups based on a questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out through coding, reduction, and triangulation across instruments, followed by cross-case comparison to ensure the consistency of themes and strengthen the interpretation of findings. The results showed that inquisitiveness strongly influenced the types and intensity of difficulties. Students with low inquisitiveness often experienced cognitive difficulties, such as reliance on formulas without verification, and affective difficulties, such as nervousness and frustration, which led them to stop. Students with medium inquisitiveness tended to experience metacognitive difficulties, recognizing contradictions but failing to regulate or adjust their strategies. High-inquisitiveness students demonstrated persistence and attempts at verification, although occasional metacognitive challenges still appeared. The study also found that inquisitiveness shaped students’ emotional responses, with higher inquisitiveness associated with greater tolerance for confusion and a stronger willingness to re-evaluate conflicting information. Inquisitiveness plays a critical role in supporting conceptual verification, self-regulation, and emotional resilience when solving mathematical problems with contradictory information. These findings emphasize that inquisitiveness is not merely a cognitive trait but also an affective resource that helps students manage uncertainty. Strengthening this disposition may improve future teachers’ reasoning and their ability to guide students through complex problem-solving situations.
Keywords: inquisitiveness, problem solving difficulties, contradictory information, pre-service elementary teachers.
Abdelghani, R., Law, E., Desvaux, C., Oudeyer, P. Y., & Sauzéon, H. (2023). Interactive environments for training children’s curiosity through the practice of metacognitive skills: a pilot study. Proceedings of IDC 2023 - 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference: Rediscovering Childhood, 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3593880
Bardone, E., & Secchi, D. (2017). Inquisitiveness: distributing rational thinking. Team Performance Management, 23(1–2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0044
Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
Cansoy, R., & Turkoglu, M. E. (2017). Examining the Relationship between Pre-Service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Disposition, Problem Solving Skills, and Teacher Self-Efficacy. International Education Studies, 10(6), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p23
Chew, K. S., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Durning, S. J. (2019). Perception of the usability and implementation of a metacognitive mnemonic to check cognitive errors in clinical setting. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1451-4
Fusaro, M., & Smith, M. C. (2018). Preschoolers’ inquisitiveness and science-relevant problem solving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42(July 2017), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.002
Hadi, F. R., & Maharani, S. (2022). Analysis of prospective elementary school teachers’ inquisitiveness in solving mathematics problems. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(2), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v14i2.3854
Hadi, F. R., & Mulyadi, M. (2025). Exploring the evolution of inquisitiveness in education: a bibliometric perspective over the last decade. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1417
Hadi, S., Herman, T., & Hasanah, A. (2018). Students’ difficulties in solving mathematical problems. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR), 8(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120257
Hannula, M. S. (2015). Emotions in Problem Solving. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (1st ed., pp. 269–288). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6
Hardy, J. H., Ness, A. M., & Mecca, J. (2017). Outside the box : Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. PAID, 104, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.004
Herwin, H., Costa, A., & Cristal, I. S. (2023). International journal of educational methodology graded response models on the curiosity measurement of elementary school students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.53
Herwin, H., & Nurhayati, R. (2021). Measuring students’ curiosity character using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.773
Hong, S. S., Bae, J., Son, L. K., & Kim, K. (2023). Negative emotion can be “more negative” for those with high metacognitive abilities when problem-solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(March), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110211
Hoth, J., Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Identifying and dealing with student errors in the mathematics classroom : Cognitive and motivational requirements. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057730
Hourani, R. B. (2013). Pre-service teachers ’ reflection : perception, preparedness and challenges. Reflective Practice : International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 14(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732947
Hurme, T. R., Siklander, S., Kangas, M., & Melasalmi, A. (2023). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ perceptions of their playfulness and inquisitiveness. Frontiers in Education, 8(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1102926
Jirout, J. J., & Matthews, S. E. (2022). Developing intellectual character: an educational perspective on how uncertainty-driven curiosity can support learning. In R. A. Beghetto & G. J. Jaeger (Eds.), Uncertainty: A Catalyst for Creativity, Learning and Development (pp. 253–268). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98729-9_14
Karademir, C. A. (2019). Pre-Service teachers’ problem solving skills and curiosity levels*. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.1.163
Kemmerle, M. (2013). Promoting student questions in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2004, 1004–1011.
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers and Education, 126, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
Kim, J. Y., Choi, D. S., Sung, C., & Park, J. Y. (2018). The role of problem solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-018-0085-4
Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2014). Error analysis of mathematical word problem solving across students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12029
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3
Litman, J. A., Robinson, O. C., & Demetre, J. D. (2017). Intrapersonal curiosity: Inquisitiveness about the inner self. Self and Identity, 16(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1255250
Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2019). Analyticity and systematicity students of mathematics education on solving non-routine problems. Mathematics and Statistics, 7(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2019.070204
Medina, M. S., Castleberry, A. N., & Persky, A. M. (2017). Strategies for improving learner metacognition in health professional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81478
Mehrad, A., & Mehrad, A. (2023). Student’s creativity in an educational environment: revelation and inquisitiveness. Journal of Education For Sustainable Innovation, 1(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v1i2.547
Miles, M. A., Huberman, M. B., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis, 3rd ed. Washington DC: Sage Publications.
Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning the role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003
Oppong, E., Shore, B. M., & Muis, K. R. (2018). Clarifying the connections among regulation and self-regulated learning : implications for theory and practice. Sage Journals, 63(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218814008
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Peters, J. R., Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Upton, B. T., Talavera, N. A., Folsom, J. J., & Baer, R. A. (2017). Characteristics of repetitive thought associated with borderline personality features: a multimodal investigation of ruminative content and style. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9594-x
Potvin, P. (2023). Response of science learners to contradicting information: a review of research. Studies in Science Education, 59(1), 67–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.2004006
Recht, S., Li, C., Yang, Y., & Chiu, K. (2025). Adaptive curiosity about metacognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(3), 852–863. https://doi.org/Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gen. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001690
Reio, T. G. (2019). Curiosity and interest. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(4), 451–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21376
Saygılı, S. (2017). Examining the problem solving skills and the strategies used by high school students in solving non-routine problems. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 91–114.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Serin, M. K. (2019). Analysis of the problems posed by pre-service primary school teachers in terms of type, cognitive structure, and content knowledge. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.577
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2021). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning : a new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Syamsulrizal, Khabibah, S., Lukito, A., & Madzkiyah, A. F. (2025). Students’ critical thinking dispositions in view of cognitive styles: exhibiting confidence in reasoning and inquisitive. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 73(1), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2025.1.37
Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2018). The mediating effects of critical thinking skills on motivation factors for mathematical reasoning ability. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0396-z
Umah, U., Asari, A. R., Sukoriyanto, & Sisworo. (2023). Students’ inquisitive questions predict their understanding of mathematics texts. Acta Scientiae, 25(6), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7466
Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., Schubert, S., & Fields, C. (2019). Surprise, curiosity, and confusion promote knowledge exploration : evidence for robust effects of epistemic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474
Watson, L. (2015). What is inquisitiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(3), 273–287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475463
Watson, L. (2019). Educating for inquisitiveness: A case against exemplarism for intellectual character education. Journal of Moral Education, 48(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1589436
Yanarates, E. (2022). Investigation of the relationship between inquisitive thinking skills and problem. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Research, 7(17), 158–191. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.445
Yayuk, E., & Husamah, H. (2020). The difficulties of prospective elementary school teachers in item problem solving for mathematics : polya’s steps. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665833
Zheng, J., Lajoie, S., & Li, S. (2023). Emotions in self-regulated learning : A critical literature review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137010
No supplementary information available.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats

