Email this article Effectiveness of Project-Based Inquiry Learning in Developing HOTS-Based Scientific Literacy: Moderated by Science Process Skill
), Retno Dwi Suyanti(2), Abdul Hasan Saragih(3), Peter Charles Sinclair Taylor(4)
| 
Country:
(1) Elementary School Teacher Education, Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Al Maksum, Indonesia
(2) Department of Physics, State University of Medan, Indonesia
(3) Department of Mechanical Engineering, State University of Medan, Indonesia
(4) Transformative Education, Murdoch University, Australia
Corresponding Author
Effectiveness of Project-Based Inquiry Learning in Developing HOTS-Based Scientific Literacy: Moderated by Science Process Skill. Objectives: This study examines three core questions: (1) whether the Project-Based Inquiry (PBI) model improves students’ HOTS scientific literacy, (2) whether students’ initial Science Process Skills (SPS) influence their outcomes, and (3) whether there is an interaction between the two. These variables were selected because HOTS-based scientific literacy and SPS are essential competencies for prospective elementary teachers. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used with two naturally formed groups. The experimental group learned through the project-based inquiry model, while the control group used guided inquiry. Data were collected using a project assessment sheet and the HOTS scientific literacy test, with identical pre- and post-tests administered. The data were analyzed using: 1) Normality and homogeneity test, 2) Paired sample t-test, 3) Independent sample t-test, and 4) Hypothesis testing was carried out using two-way ANOVA, where H₀ was rejected if the significance value was <0.05. Findings: The analysis for the learning model factor yielded a highly significant result (p = 0.000; < 0.05). The results show that the learning model had a significant effect on HOTS scientific literacy, with the PBI model outperforming guided inquiry (p = 0.000). SPS level did not produce a significant independent effect (p = 0.562), and no interaction was found between the learning model and SPS. These findings indicate that the PBI model is the primary factor driving students’ improvement. Conclusion: Overall, Project-Based Inquiry is an effective approach to strengthening HOTS scientific literacy among prospective elementary teachers. Although SPS levels did not independently influence outcomes, students across SPS levels still benefited from PBI. These findings offer theoretical insight into how inquiry–project learning supports higher-order reasoning and provide practical guidance for developing instructional designs that foster analytical and evidence-based thinking in teacher education programs.
Keywords: project-based inquiry, guided inquiry, science process skill, hots, scientific literacy, science education.
Affandi, Y., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2022). The evaluation of JIDI (jigsaw discovery) learning model in the course of qur'an tafsir. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15146a
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2010). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning ? does discovery-based instruction enhance learning ? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Ali, Y., & Jager, L. De. (2020). Connecting life sciences concepts to everyday life: A learner’s perspective. The 2020 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, September 2020, 3–9.
Alromaih, M. A., Elsayed, S. A., & Alibraheim, E. A. (2022). Study of project-based learning to improve the instructional design process of pre-service early childhood teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1762
Amelia, D., Setiaji, B., Primadewi, K., Habibah, U., Lounggina, T., Peny, L., Rajagukguk, K. P., Nugraha, D., Safitri, W., Wahab, A., Larisu, Z., Setiaji, B., & Dharta, F. Y. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif [quantitative research methods]. Aceh: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., A. P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Antonio, R. P., & Effects, P. M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students ’ higher -order thinking skills in science : a meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 251–281.
Arikunto, S. (2017). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktek [research procedures: a practical approach]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1329564
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2018). The effect of three levels of inquiry on the improvement of science concept understanding of elementary school teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11216a
Asma, H., & Dallel, S. (2020). Cognitive load theory and its relation to instructional design: perspectives of some algerian university teachers of english. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 11(4), 110–127.
Bank, W. (2020). The promise of education in indonesia. World Bank Publications.
Baran, M., Maskan, A., & Yasar, S. (2018). Learning physics through project-based learning game techniques. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11215a
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning : a review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. Edutopia : The George Lucas Educational Foundation.
Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
Bybee, R. W. (2014). BSCS 5E instructional model: personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13.
Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
Chatzipanteli, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2014). Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.861456
Chen, Y. L., & Tippett, C. D. (2022). Project-Based inquiry in STEM teaching for preschool children. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11899
Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library and Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.017
Cook, J. L., & Cook, G. (2005). Child development. principles and perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Corno, L., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Outgoing Editors’ Statement. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_1
Costa, S. L. R., & Broietti, F. (2021). Scientific practices in science education : a systematic review of research characteristics and trends. Ensino & Pesquisa, União Da Vitória, 19(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.33871/23594381.2021.19.3.203-219
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darmuki, A., Andayani, Nurkamto, J., & Saddhono, K. (2018). The development and evaluation of speaking learning model by cooperative approach agus. In (Vol. 11, Issue 2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1129a
De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2024). Beyond inquiry or direct instruction: pressing issues for designing impactful science learning opportunities. Educational Research Review, 44(July), 100623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100623
Deratama, D., Wulan, A. R., Diana, S., & Agustian, D. (2022). The assessment profile of the skills to interpret data and evidence scientifically in high school on the covid-19 virus pandemic content. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.22375
Dewi, C. A., & Mashami, R. A. (2019). The effect of the chemo-entrepreneurship-oriented inquiry module on improving students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10279a
Donohue, K., Buck, G. A., & Akerson, V. (2020). Where’s the science? Exploring a new science teacher educator’s theoretical and practical understandings of scientific inquiry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.571
Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., NgatIjo, & Sulistiyo, U. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in Indonesia: Portraying supports, situational beliefs, and chemistry teachers’ adoptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.6
Ellwood, R., & Abrams, E. (2018). Students’ social interaction in inquiry-based science education: how experiences of flow can increase motivation and achievement. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 395–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9769-x
Erenler, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2019). Utilizing argument-driven inquiry to develop pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness and writing skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 628–638.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism : comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
Firman, M. A., Ertikanto, C., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). Description of meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning of science in improving students’ inquiry skills. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022018
Fischer, F., Chinn, C. A., Engelmann, K., & Osborne, J. (2018). Reasoning and argumentation: the roles of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203731826
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2013). Constructivism : a psychological theory of learning. Columbia University : Teachers College Press.
Fraser, B. (2021). Encyclopedia of Science Education. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039
Gunawan, Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students’ problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 427–442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational. Research Association’s Division D, Measurement and Research.
Hetmanek, A., Engelmann, K., Opitz, A., & Fischer, F. (2018). Beyond intelligence and domain knowledge: scientific reasoning and argumentation as a set of cross-domain skills. In Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: The Roles of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge (pp. 203–226). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203731826-12
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Chittleborough, G. (2017). Representation construction: a guided inquiry approach for science education. In R. Jorgensen, & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM education in the junior secondary (pp. 57–89). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8
Jeffery, E., Nomme, K., Deane, T., Pollock, C., & Birol, G. (2016). Investigating the role of an inquiry-based biology lab course on student attitudes and views toward science. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0203
Johnson, L., McHugh, S., Eagle, J. L., & Spires, H. A. (2019). Project-based inquiry (pbi) global in kindergarten classroom: inquiring about the world. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(5), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00946-4
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. 213–233.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. (pp. 317–333). Cambridge University Press.
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
Kurt, G., & Akoglu, K. (2023). Project-based learning in science education : A comprehensive literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2311.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Learning, A. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. Canada : Alberta Learning.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., Nature, A., Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 1(3), 138–147.
Meissner, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Towards cognitive load theory as guideline for instructional design in science education. World Journal of Education, 3(2), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n2p24
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it, and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2019). Timss 2019 international results in mathematics and science timss & Pirl. In International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness : a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(1), 1–4.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9596
Nuangchalerm, P., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2018). Comparative study between Indonesian and Thai novice science teacher students in content of science. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.75
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) – Country notes: Indonesia. In Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ölçer, S. (2025). Inquiry-Based science teaching in primary school. Journal of Child Development and Education, 1(July), 55–66.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. De, Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning : Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Prachagool, V., Nuangchalerm, P., Subramaniam, G., & Dostál, J. (2016). Pedagogical decision-making through the lens of the teacher preparation program. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2016116351
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis, L. (2018). Critical inquiry based learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10220a
Probine, S., Perry, J., Burke, R., Alderson, J., & McAlevey, F. (2023). An examination of inquiry-based project learning in early childhood settings in aotearoa/new zealand. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01495-7
Ritter, B. A., Small, E. E., Mortimer, J. W., & Doll, J. L. (2018). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917703679
Santín, M. F., & Torruella, M. F. (2017). Reggio emilia: an essential tool to develop critical thinking in early childhood. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.207
Santosa, C., Rybskac, E., Klichowskid, M., Jankowiakd, A., Jaskulskad, S., Dominguese, N., Carvalho, D., Rochaf, T., Paredes, H., Martinsf, P., & Rochaa, J. (2023). Science education through project-based learning : a case study. Procedia Computer Science, 219(2022), 1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.465
Schleinschok, K., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text? Learning and Instruction, 51, 10–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.002
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental for generalized designs causal inference. New York : Houghton Mifflin Company.
Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021). When problem solving followed by instruction works : evidence for productive failure. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 761–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019105
Smith, C. L., & Wiser, M. (2015). On the importance of epistemology–disciplinary core concept interactions in LPs. Science Education, 99(3), 417–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21166
Stacey, S. (2019). Inquiry-Based early learning environments : creating, supporting, and collaborating. London : Redleaf Press.
Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4c (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14, 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
Suprihatin, D., Winarni, R., Saddhono, K., & Wardani, N. E. (2023). The influence of indonesian instructional books with a scientific approach on students’ learning outcomes in scientific writing. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16230a
Tatto, M. T. (2022). Psychology, the empirical method, and collaborative evaluation research. In The Role of Interdisciplinarity, Multiple Methodologies and Context (Issue October 2021). USA : Arizona State University.
Urdanivia Alarcón, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Cáceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta-analysis : differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning Volume, 3(1), 3–24.
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chun, C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(May), 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
Xu, X., Chan, F. M., & Yilin, S. (2020). Personal learning environment: an experience with ESP teacher training. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1552872
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats