Email this article Beyond Academics: The Impact of Universal Design for Learning on the Subjective Well-Being of Children with Special Needs
), Sri Wahyuni(2), Syahdan Syahdan(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Department of Early Childhood Teacher Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
(2) Department of Special Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
(3) Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, Province of China
Corresponding Author
Beyond Academics: The Impact of Universal Design for Learning on the Subjective Well-Being of Children with Special Needs. Equity is another key area in which inclusive education of children with special needs is of interest, aiming to enhance their quality of life, including subjective well-being, a significant aspect of child development. Objectives: This research aims to investigate the impact of the Universal Design for Learning approach on the subjective well-being of children with special needs. The proposed research examines how the subjective well-being of children with special needs is affected by the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) strategy. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design. The UDL strategy acts as the independent variable, while subjective well-being is the dependent variable. This study involved a total of 36 children with special needs, of whom 24 were selected using purposive sampling. They were divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group, each comprising 12 participants. The data obtained were evaluated using non-parametric and descriptive statistical methods. Findings: The result showed a significant increase in subjective well-being for the children in the experimental group compared to the control group, with a p-value of 0.002 (p < 0.05). Finally, it has been discussed that the application of the Universal Design for Learning approach has a substantial influence on the way children perceive themselves. Conclusions: The application of the UDL approach significantly improves the subjective well-being of children with special needs, demonstrating the importance of integrating UDL into the inclusive education curriculum. These findings encourage the development of more adaptive education policies and psychosocial interventions that support children's social-emotional development.
Keywords: children with special needs, educational approach, subjective well-being, treatment effect, universal design for learning
Basham, J. D., Gardner, J. E., & Smith, S. J. (2020). Measuring the implementation of udl in classrooms and schools: initial field test results. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520908015
Casebolt, M. T., & Humphrey, K. (2023). Use of universal design for learning principles in a public health course. Annals of Global Health, 89(1), 48 https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4045
Chen, C. (2023). Developments in the built environment can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development ? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Developments in the Built Environment, 13(November 2022), 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100108
Chen, H., Evans, D., & Luu, B. (2023). Moving towards inclusive education: secondary school teacher attitudes towards universal design for learning in australia. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 47(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2023.1
Cohen, L. , M. L. , & M. K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Diener-Subjective well-being.pdf. The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0017
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 125, pp. 276–302. Retrieved from http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 37). Springer.
Hallahan, D., Kauffman, J., & Pullen, P. (2014). Exceptional learners: an introduction to special education. In Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education (12th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education Limited.
Han, Y. (2021). Does career resilience promote subjective well-being? mediating effects of career success and work stress. Journal of Career Development, 48(4), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319851875.
Hope, D., & Dewar, A. (2015). Conducting quantitative educational research: a short guide for clinical teachers. The Clinical Teacher, 12(5), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12457
Jahanbakhsh Ganjeh, S., Oraizi, H. R., Molavi, H., & Nouri, A. (2010). The relationship of employees' job control with job stress and subjective well–being. Journal of Isfahan Medical School, 27(103), 840–850.
Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2011). Handbook of special education. United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140, Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2787065.
Kusumastuti, D. E. (2019). Kontribusi pemerintah daerah provinsi kalimantan selatan dalam implementasi pendidikan inklusi [The contribution of the regional government of south kalimantan province to the implementation of inclusive education]. Jurnal Sagacious, 5(2), 91–96.
Li, Y.-F., Zhang, D., Liu, C.-T., Wang, K., Yan, W., & Dong, X. (2024). Perceptions of UDL teaching practices among university students with disabilities. Education Sciences, 14(5), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050501
Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
Lowrey, K. A., Hollingshead, A., Howery, K., & Bishop, J. B. (2017). More than one way: stories of udl and inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668
Ogelman, H. G., Sarıkaya, H. E., GÜNGÖR, H., & Körükçü, Ö. (2018). Examining the effect of social-emotional prevention program on social and communication skills of disadvantaged preschool children. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 4(1–2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.525173
Pekaar, K. A. (2019). The consequences of self- and other-focused emotional intelligence: Not all sunshine and roses. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000134
Pratiwi, Y. D. (2013). Aksesibilitas pendidikan bagi mahasiswa difabel dalam rangka kesetaraan hak memperoleh pendidikan (Studi di Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta).
Rao, K. (2003). Coping and subjective well-being in women with multiple roles. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 49(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640030493003
Rao, K. (2021a). Inclusive instructional design: applying UDL to online learning. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/101/kr
Ray, A. B. (2022). Secondary educators’ writing practices for students with disabilities: examining distance learning and in-person instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221142816
Repetto, M., Bruschi, B., & Talarico, M. (2022). A Learning Design Framework Based on UDL Principles to Develop Maker Projects for Pre-Service Teacher and Educator Training. Media Education. https://doi.org/10.36253/me-13465
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. ERIC.
Rose, D., Meyer, A., & Gordon, D. (2013). Universal design for learning: theory and practice.
Rosenthal, D. (2006). Rehabilitation students’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high- and low-stakes social contexts: A conjoint analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(24), 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600646102
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Seok, S., DaCosta, B., & Hodges, R. (2018). A systematic review of empirically based universal design for learning: implementation and effectiveness of universal design in education for students with and without disabilities at the postsecondary level. Open Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.65014
Sulaiman, L. H., & Tahar, M. M. (2024). Implementation of universal learning design principles by mainstream teachers in inclusive education programs. Se. https://doi.org/10.59055/se.v2i1.15
Vitelli, E. M. (2015). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618931
Wahyuni, S., Putri, A. A., & Reswita, R. (2021). Parenting culture of low-income families in implications for the subjective well-being of early childhood students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.968
Zhang, C., & Shi, L. (2022). Sequential recommendation with dual learning. 2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI56018.2022.00017
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats