Email this article Global Insights for National Reform: A Comparative Review of Education Management in Finland, Japan, Singapore, and the United States
), Herinto Sidik Iriansyah(2), Fachmi Tamzil(3), Sarlina Sari(4), Rasman Bin Saridin(5)
| 
Country:
(1) Department of Communication Science, Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civic and Citizenship Education, STKIP Kusuma Negara, Indonesia
(3) Department of Management, Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
(4) Department of Accounting, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia
(5) Head Islamic Studies at Institut Ramlah Daing Abdul Kadir, Singapore
Corresponding Author
Global Insights for National Reform: A Comparative Review of Education Management in Finland, Japan, Singapore, and the United States. Objective: This study aims to analyze and compare the governance structures, curriculum models, teacher professionalism, learning strategies, assessment systems, and international achievements of education systems in Finland, Japan, Singapore, and the United States, and to derive strategic lessons relevant for improving the Indonesian education system. Methods: The research employs a qualitative comparative design based on a systematic literature review. The search strategy covered international databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ProQuest, and Google Scholar) and official sources (OECD, UNESCO, and BPS). From 734 initial documents, 30 high-quality sources were selected through a screening process, eligibility assessment, and critical appraisal using CASP and MMAT tools. Data extraction followed a structured template and was analyzed through thematic coding and comparative synthesis across six key dimensions: governance, curriculum, teacher quality, learning strategies, student evaluation, and international achievement. Findings: The analysis shows that the success of education systems in developed countries is supported by key principles: Finland emphasizes trust-based governance and phenomenal learning, Japan prioritizes teacher collaboration through lesson study and discipline, Singapore utilizes meritocracy and structured career paths for teachers, and the United States emphasizes curriculum flexibility and local innovation. Indonesia, despite implementing the Independent Curriculum and the Freedom to Learn policy, still faces challenges related to resource inequality, teacher competency, and the implementation of innovative learning. Conclusion/Contribution: The study concludes that Indonesia must invest in teacher capacity, equitable distribution, and formative evaluation while adopting international best practices that align with its socio-cultural realities. The contribution of this study lies in providing evidence-based, contextualized policy recommendations that integrate global insights into Indonesia’s path toward a more equitable, innovative, and sustainable education system.
Keywords: education system, education management, comparative studies, Indonesian education reform.
Ariansyah, M., & Winarko, F. (2024). Mismatch between higher education and labor market in Indonesia: Evidence from BPS data. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 2(4), 40–52.
Bautista, A., Wong, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2015). Teacher professional development in Singapore: Depicting the landscape. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.519
Bilad, M. R., Yusof, K. M., Kurniawan, T., Widyaningsih, S. W., Aisyah, S., & Samad, A. A. (2024). Addressing the PISA 2022 results: A call for reinvigorating Indonesia’s education system. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijece2024.1.1.1
Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian education: teachers, schools, and central bureaucracy. Routledge.
BPS. 2023. “Statistik Pendidikan 2023.” Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. https://web-api.bps.go.id.
Cave, P. (2019). Schooling selves: autonomy, interdependence, and reform in japanese junior high education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). The flat world and education: how america’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Databoks. t.t. “10 provinsi dengan pengangguran tertinggi awal 2024.” Diakses 5 Oktober 2024. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ketenagakerjaan/statistik/2523f7e0fe6b99c/10-provinsi-dengan-pengangguran-tertinggi-awal-2024.
Gopinathan, S. (2012). Singapore’s evolving approach to teacher professional development. In C. K. E. Lee & J. P. Tan (Eds.), Educational Policy Innovations: Levelling Up and Sustaining Educational Achievement (pp. 51–64). Singapore: Springer.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: education and the economics of growth. MIT Press.
Hendry, J. (2013). Understanding japanese society. Routledge.
Itkonen, T. (2018). Contradictions of finnish education: finnishness, interculturality, and social justice [Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki].
Kangas, M., Kopisto, K., & Virta, A. (2019). Implementing phenomenon-based learning in Finnish schools: Teacher perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482968
Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Laporan implementasi kebijakan merdeka belajar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kwek, D., Ho, J., & Wong, H. M. (2023). Singapore’s educational reforms toward holistic outcomes: unintended consequences of policy layering. Brookings Institution.
Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from finland. Helsinki: Edita Publishing.
Ng, P. T. (2017). Learning from Singapore: The Power of Paradoxes. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 16(2), 173–187.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Volume I). OECD Publishing.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.
Ripley, A. (2015). The smartest kids in the world: And how they got that way. Simon & Schuster.
Rohlen, T. P. (2019). Japan’s High Schools. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in finland? Teachers College Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: what can the world learn from educational change in finland? New York: Teachers College Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: what can the world learn from educational change in finland? Teachers College Press.
Schleicher, A. (2019). OECD education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Shimahara, N. K. (2017). Education reform in japan: a case of immobilist politics. London: Routledge.
Spring, J. (2016). American education. Routledge.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Policy borrowing and lending in education. Routledge.
Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: why our schools are failing and what we can learn from japanese and chinese education. Simon & Schuster.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. Free Press.
Susanto, H. (2021). Tantangan implementasi kurikulum merdeka di indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 112–123.
Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 513–526.
Takayama, K. (2018). Beyond PISA: A Critique of the OECD's global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 62(3), 424–445.
Tan, C. (2018). Learning from Singapore: the power of paradoxes. New York: Routledge.
Tan, J. (2010). Education in Singapore: Development since 1965. Springer.
Tan, J., & Chua, C. (2020). Education in singapore: development, policy and practice. Springer.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2009). Kebijakan pendidikan: Kajian strategis untuk pendidikan masa depan. Pustaka Pelajar.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2009). Kebijakan pendidikan: kajian teoritis dan analisis praktis. Rineka Cipta.
Tonga, D., Yıldırım, K., & Dönmez, A. (2019). Professional development of teachers in pisa achieving countries: finland, estonia, japan, singapore, and china. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 250–263.
Tsuneyoshi, R. (2024). Tokkatsu: The Japanese educational model of holistic education. International Journal of Holistic Education, 10(2), 45–60.
U.S. Department of Education. (2021). The federal role in education. U.S. Department of Education.
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Wijaya, A., Maulyda, M. A., Hasibuan, L., Syafitri, L., & Masri, N. (2024). Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers. Infinity: Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1–20.
Wong, R., & Wong, A. (2020). Academic stress and mental health among students in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(3), 305–321.
World Bank. (2020). Improving teacher professional development in indonesia. World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2020). The promise of education in indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats