Contextual Sociology Learning Design: Integration of Dick and Carey and Angkringan Pedagogy to Develop Sociological Imagination
Country:
(1) Department of Sociology Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Doctoral Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Doctoral Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Indonesia, Indonesia
(4) Doctoral Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Indonesia, Indonesia
(5) Department of Sociology Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Indonesia, Indonesia
Contextual Sociology Learning Design: Integration of Dick and Carey and Angkringan Pedagogy to Develop Sociological Imagination. Objective: This study develops a contextual sociology learning design by integrating the Dick and Carey instructional design model with the angkringan style pedagogy approach. Angkringan pedagogy represents an egalitarian educational framework, grounded in local wisdom, that promotes social reflection and active engagement in discussions surrounding diverse community issues. This method draws inspiration from the daily interactions of Indonesian individuals in angkringan, which serve as friendly and open gathering spaces. The objective is to encourage students' sociological imagination and create a participatory, meaningful, and culturally appropriate learning environment. Methods: The learning design was developed using the Design-Based Case Study (DbCS) technique, involving 82 students in several iterative cycles. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, then analyzed qualitatively. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using a rubric to assess scientific articles written by students. The Dick and Carey learning model was modified by integrating elements of angkringan-style discussions, which emphasize equal conversation and social reflection. Findings: The results of the study show that the integration of this approach can increase students' active participation, critical thinking skills, and the ability to develop sociological imagination, especially in linking personal experiences to broader social dynamics. In addition, this design also strengthens equal pedagogical relationships and positively impacts the quality of scientific articles produced by students. Quantitatively, this design improved the average score of students’ scientific articles to 3.79 (categorized as very good) and resulted in the publication of seventeen articles in Sinta 5-indexed national journals and ten in Sinta 6-indexed national journals. Conclusion: Integrating systematic learning design with culturally contextual pedagogical approaches results in an innovative methodology in sociology education. This methodology contributes to forming a reflective academic identity, enhancing research capacity, and developing an inclusive and responsive learning environment to social diversity. This concept strengthens the practice of critical pedagogy in educational institutions and has cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural relevance.
Keywords: instructional design, design-based research, dick and carey, angkringan pedagogy, sociological imagination.
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Aprilianti, N., Leksono, I. P., & Rohman, U. (2023). Development of video-based multimedia for Javanese language subjects material maca geguritan through Dick and Carey model. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 8(3), 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v8i3.4566
Bradshaw, A., Davies, J. M., Williamson, L., Torlay, B., Braybrook, D., Scott, H., & Bajwah, S. (2024). Social class, the overlooked element of diversity within higher education: An analysis of policy documents and data collection practices by Russell Group universities in the United Kingdom. Sociology, 59(1), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241286383
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cant, S., & Chatterjee, A. (2023). Powerful or disempowering knowledge? The teaching of sociology in english schools and colleges. Sociology, 57(3), 606-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221107299
Casey, E., & O’Brien, D. (2020). Sociology, Sociology and the cultural and creative industries. Sociology, 54(3), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520904712
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Douglas, C. M. (2020). A case study for culturally responsive teaching in Glodok, Jakarta, Indonesia: The negotiation of identity and instruction for a Chinese-Indonesian educator. International Journal of Chinese Education, 9(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340122
Eller, C. C., Khanna, K., & Mellon, G. (2024). Intermediate educational transitions, alignment, and inequality in U.S. higher education. Sociology of Education, 97(4), 316-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407241245392
Ernawati, T., Rosana, D., Atun, S., &. S. (2024). Exploration of culturally responsive teaching and problem-based learning in the diverse learning of prospective science teachers. International Journal of Religion, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.61707/t1bg2083
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Goff, K., Silver, E., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2022). Academic orientation as a function of moral fit: The role of individualizing morality. Sociology of Education, 95(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407211072428
Gruijters, R. J., Raabe, I. J., & Hübner, N. (2024). Socio-emotional skills and the socioeconomic achievement gap. Sociology of Education, 97(2), 120-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407231216424
Hurst, A. L., Roscigno, V. J., Jack, A. A., McDermott, M., Warnock, D. M., Muñoz, J. A., Johnson, W., Lee, E. M., King, C. R., Brady, D., Francis, R. D., Delaney, K. J., & Vitullo, M. W. (2023). The graduate school pipeline and first-generation/working-class inequalities. Sociology of Education, 97(2), 148-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407231215051
Jackson, T. O., & Boutte, G. S. (2018). Exploring culturally relevant/responsive pedagogy as praxis in teacher education. The New Educator, 14(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2018.1426320
Keating, A. (2021). Mobility for me but not for others: The contradictory cosmopolitan practices of contemporary white British youth. Sociology, 55(6), 1100-1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038521999565
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lorenz, G., Kogan, I., Gentrup, S., & Kristen, C. (2024). Non-native accents among school beginners and teacher expectations for future student achievements. Sociology of Education, 97(1), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407231202978
Martínez, M. A. (2024). Activist research as a methodological toolbox to advance public sociology. Sociology, 58(4), 832-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231219207
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). USA: Jossey-Bass.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Myers, M. (2023). The unhomely of homeschooling. Sociology, 57(5), 1101-1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221129943
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
Palmer, N. S. (2024). The sociological imagination in challenging times. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 16(2), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.62915/2154-8935.1188
Plavgo, I., & Bernardi, F. (2024). Trends and determinants of intergenerational educational inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa for birth cohorts 1974 to 2003. Sociology of Education, 97(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407231210279
Rousseau, N. (2020). The Sociological imagination, neoliberalism, and higher education. Social Currents, 7(5), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496520912735
Sepúlveda, D. (2023). Upward social mobility in Chile: The negotiation of class and ethnic identities. Sociology, 57(3), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221099402
Schirmer, B. R., & Lockman, A. S. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching in an undergraduate online general education course. Online Learning Journal, 26(3), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2805
Towers, L. (2023). Knowing what you’ve got once it’s gone: Identifying familial norms and values through the lens of (sibling) bereavement. Sociology, 57(5), 1175-1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221133214
Vani, K. T., Ulfa, S., & Kuswandi, D. (2023). Desain pembelajaran proyek kolaborasi menggunakan model SECI untuk bidang studi IPS [Collaborative project-based learning design using the SECI model for social studies subjects]. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 037-049. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um038v6i12023p037
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
No supplementary information available.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats

