Email this article Studi Investigasi Hubungan Antara Metakognisi, Self-regulasi dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa
) (1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2017 Diah Utaminingsih
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
An Investigation of the relationship among metacognition, student’s self regulated learning and learning motivation. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among metacognition, self-regulation, and learning motivation. The sample of study consists of 130 secondary education students who were enrolled in different programs at Bandar Lampung, in Lampung. In this study, Metacognitive Learning Inventory-Science Scale adapted from An & Co (2014) was used. The relationships among metacognition (a), self-regulation (b), and learning motivation (c) were examined using correlation analysis and the hypothesis model was examined using multiple regression analysis. In correlation analysis, metacognition, and self-regulation were found positively (respectively r (a-b) = 0,430; r(a-c) = 0,584; r(b-c) = 0,497; p < 0,01). According to results metacognition was predicted positively by self-regulation and learning motivation (respectively R2 (a-b) = 18,5%; R2 (a-c) = 34,1%; R2 (b-c) = 24,1%).
Keywords:metacognition, self-regulation, learning motivation
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v7.i1.201701
References
An, Y.J. & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the effects of metacognitive scaffolding on students’ design problem solving and metacognitive skills in an online environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 552.
Amsterlaw, J. (2006). Children’s beliefs about everyday reasoning. Child Development, 77(2), 443–464.
Biggs, J.B. (1985). The role of metaleaning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185–212.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Como, L., Collins, K., & Capper, J. (1982, March). Where there’s a way there’s a will: Self-regulating the low-achieving student. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Kurtz, B.E., & Borkowski, F.G. (1984). Children’s metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 335–354.
Landine, J. & Stewart, J. (1998). Relationship between metacognition, motivation, locus of control, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 200–212.
Lindner, R. & Harris, B. (1992). The development and evaluation of a self-regulated learning inventory and its implications for instructor-independent instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-Regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Stipek, D. (1982, July). Motivating students to learn: A lifelong perspective. Paper presented at the Symposium, “The Student’s Role in Learning,” of the National Commission on Excellence in Education, San Diego, CA.
Uguroglu, M.E. & Walberg, H.J. (1986). Predicting achievement and motivation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19, 1–12.
Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1992). The motive-strategy congruence model revisited. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 194–198.
Veenman, M. & Elshout, J.J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(4), 509–523.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats