Comparison of Problem Based Learning and Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Students Academic Performance

John Rafafy Batlolona(1,Mail), Theresia Laurens(2), Marleny Leasa(3), Mariyam Batlolona(4), Rudolf Kempa(5), Javier Julian Enriquez(6) | CountryCountry:


(1) Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia
(6) Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain

MailCorresponding Author

DOI 10.23960/jpp.v9.i2.201921
Metrics→
              
Indexing Site→


Download Full Text: PDF

Copyright (c) 2019 John Rafafy Batlolona, Theresia Laurens, Marleny Leasa, Mariyam Batlolona, Rudolf Kempa, Javier Julian Enriquez


Comparison of problem based learning and realistic mathematics education to improve student academic performance. Objectives: The aim of this study was to see an increase in the academic performance of island students in Ambon City by applying the problem based learning (PBL) learning model and realistic mathematics education (RME). Methods: This research was in the form of a descriptive qualitative study with a case study approach and a sample of 116 students. Findings: There was a significant increase in student academic performance at each meeting and learning outcomes with PBL were higher than RME. Conclusion: The PBL model is more effective in increasing students’ academic performance than RME because students were facilitated with onlinebased media in PBL when compared to RME, so that it can attract students’ attention in learning and have a significant impact on student academic performance.

 

Keywords: Academic performance, problem-based learning, realistic mathematics education

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v9.i2.201921


Adulyasas, L., & Rahman, S. A. (2014). Lesson study incorporating phase-based instruction using geometer’s sketchpad and its effects on thai students’ geometric thinking. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(3), 252-271.

Ali, N., Ali, S., Mokhtar, N., & Salamat, A. S. A. (2009). The factors influencing students’ performance at Universiti Teknologi Mara Kedah, Malaysia. Management Science and Engineering, 3(4), 81-90.

Bastos, R. M. B. (2017). The surprising success of the finnish educational system in a global scenario of commodified education. Revista Brasileira de Educacao, 22(70), 802-825.

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. M. (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4-14.

Cotic, M., & Zuljan, M. V. (2009). Problem-based instruction in mathematics and its impact on the cognitive results of the students and on affective motivational aspects. Educational Studies, 35(3), 297-310.

Damkhi, M., & Pehlivan, H. (2018). Determining the results of tournament games using complete graphs generation. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 37(5), 6198-6211.

Fakeye, D. O. (2002). Effect of componential and rhetorical strategies on students’ achievement in essay writing. Ph.D Thesis, Unpublished. Ibadan: University of Ibadan.

Fakeye, D. O. (2010). Students’ personal variables as correlates of academic achievement in english as a second language in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 205-211.

Inel, D., & Balim, A. G. (2010). The effects of using problem-based learning in science and technology teaching upon students’ academic achievement and levels of structuring concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1-23.

Kantar, L. (2014). Incorporation of constructivist assumptions into problem-based instruction: a literature review. Nurse Education In Practice, 14(3), 233-241.

Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578.

Leasa, M., & Corebima, D. A. (2017). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. IOP Conf Series: Journal of Physics, 795, 2-9.

Lease, M., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning models on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 795, 1-9.

Lee, S. (2014). An Exploration of Learning Environmental Factors Affecting Student Cognitive Engagement: Implications For Instructional Design Research. Educational Technology International, 15(2), 143-170.

Loyens, S. M. M., Jones, S. H., Mikkers, J., & van Gog, T. (2015). Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 38, 34-42.

Mantri, A. (2014). Working towards a scalable model of problem-based learning instruction in undergraduate engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(3), 282-299.

Marioni, R. E., Ritchie, S. J., Joshi, P. K., Hagenaars, S. P., Okbay, A., Fischer, K.,... Deary, I. J. (2016). Genetic variants linked to education predict longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 13366-13371.

Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: a comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2), 49-69.

Ministry Of Education And Culture - Finland. Education in Finland. Finland Education in a nutshell. 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 22 jun. 2017.

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2010). Scholen voor Morgen [Schooling for Tomorrow]. The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.

Okland, G. M. (2012). Determinants of learning outcome for students at high school in Norway: a constructivist approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 119-138.

Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109-119.

Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: more is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373-410.

Ratumanan, G. T. (2016). Motivasi siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016: Pengembangan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika untuk Mendukung Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Matematika, 6-13.

Rotgans, J. I., O’Grady, G., & Alwis, W. A. M. (2011). Introduction: studies on the learning process in the one-day, one-problem approach to problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 443-448.

Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: how can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145-158.

Smith, A., & Hall, E. (1902). The teaching of chemistry and physics in the secondary school. New York: Longmans, Green.

West. General Self-Concept, Self-Concept of Academic Ability and School Achievement: Implications for “Causes” of Self-Concept.

Yakina, K., Kurniati, T., & Fadhilah, R. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran kimia kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Ambawang. Ar-Razi Jurnal Ilmiah, 5(2), 287-297.

Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: an overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75-79.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats