Email this article Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kejuruan Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think, Talk, and Write (TTW)
), Darmanta Sulistya(2), Sulidar Fitri(3) (1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2018 Sulimah Sulimah, Darmanta Sulistya, Sulidar Fitri
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
This study was aimed to improve the learning achievement of reinforced concrete construction that had not reached the Pre-Determined Minimum Criteria of Standard Mastery (KKM) through the implementation of Think Talk and Write (TTW) learning model. This research involved 31 students of SMK in Wonosari Sub-District, Gunung Kidul Regency, Yogyakarta. The research design used was Classroom Action Research (PTK) one cycle consisting of: (1) planning, (2) implementation, (3) observation, and (4) reflection. Data collection techniques used were observation techniques, questionnaires, testing, and documentation analyzed by qualitative and quantitative descriptive techniques. The instruments used were observation sheets, questionnaires, interview guides, and test instruments. The results showed that the TTW learning model significantly improved the achievement of student learning outcomes. The results were shown from the results of the percentage of students’ learning mastery in the first cycle with the number of 18 students showed the percentage of 58.06% and the second cycle with the number of 27 students showed a percentage of 87.1%, so there was a 25.8% increase. In addition, the TTW learning model was able to improve student’s learning activities from first cycle to second cycle with the average gain value of 0.3625 which indicates that the inhancement of student’s learning activities was in the medium category. The overall increase in student activity and learning outcomes was supported by the students’ positive responses to learning that applied the TTW learning model.
Keywords: Learning, Think Talk and Write (TTW), Learning Achievement.
References
Ajaja, O. P., & Eravwoke, O. U. (2010). Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy on Junior Secondary School Students Achievement in Integrated Science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1).
Arikunto, S. (2001). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Azizan, M. T., Mellon, N., Ramli, R. M., & Yusup, S. (2018). Improving teamwork skills and enhancing deep learning via development of board game using cooperative learning method in Reaction Engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 22, 1–13.
Banikowski, A. (1999). Strategies to Enhance Memory Based on Brain Research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(2).
Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—Practice, Problem Solving, and Projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121–144.
Baş, G., & Beyhab, Ö. (2017). Effects of multiple intelligences supported project-based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 365–386.
Eymur, G., & Geban, Ö. (2017). The Collaboration of Cooperative Learning and Conceptual Change: Enhancing the Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 853–871.
Hake, R. R. (2001). Lessons from the physics-education reform effort. arXiv preprint, physics/0106087.
Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & McCune, V. (2017). Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 385–400.
Huinker, D., & Laughlin, C. (1996). Talk Your Way into Writing. Available at: http://elemmath.wiki.educ.msu.edu/file/view/huinker%26Laughlin_YrbkCh12_write.pdf [Accessed 16/05/2017].
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Lukman, A. A. (2017). The Difference of Learning Model Think-Talk-Write (TTW) and Conventional Learning Model in Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Sociology Subject. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences (IRJES), 21.
Raufany, G., Solfitri, T., & Siregar, S. N. (2018). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas X IPA 1 SMA Negeri 2 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 1–10.
Rizal, S. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write (TTW) terhadap Keaktifan dalam Pembelajaran IPS Kelas V SDN 020 Kuok. Jurnal Basicedu, 2(1), 111–119.
Runanda, I., & Siregar, S. N. (2017). Penerapan Strategi Think-Talk-Write (TTW) dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Peserta Didik Kelas X3 SMA Negeri 4 Tanah Putih. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 1–10.
Sari, D. P., Habibi, H., & Habibburahman, L. (2016). Implementation of Think Talk Write (TTW) to Improve Student’s Activity and Learning Achievement. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 4(1), 13–15.
Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53.
Triana, A., Hamid, A., & Tarmizi, T. (2017). Upaya Peningkatan Pemahaman Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XC Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Pada Materi Gerak Lurus Di SMA Negeri 1 Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 196–201.
Waterman, A. S. (2014). An overview of service-learning and the role of research and evaluation in service-learning programs. In Service-learning (pp. 15–26). Routledge.
Weaver, J. P., Chastain, R. J., DeCaro, D. A., & DeCaro, M. S. (2018). Reverse the routine: Problem solving before instruction improves conceptual knowledge in undergraduate physics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 36–47.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats