Email this article Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Minat Belajar Biologi Siswa Lintas Minat
Abstract
The Influence of Guided Inquiry Learning Model toward The Interest of Learning Study of Biology Student Cross-Interest. This quasy Experiment research aims to determine the influence of guided inquiry learning model toward the interest of biology students learning cross-interest involving 66 high school students in Tenggarong Seberang. The research design used non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The data analysis of the increase of
students’ learning interest in the application of this learning model was obtained from the mean of N-Gain, while the influence of inquiry learning model was guided against the interest of learning done through t-test for normal distributed data and U Mann-Whitney U test for abnormally distributed data. Based on data analysis, it was found that biology learning interest score after learning process in experiment and control class was significantly different (sig. (2- tailed) <0.05). In addition, there was an increase in student interest in the low category but significantly different (U test = 257.0 <Utabel = 818).
Keyword: Guided inquiry, cross-interest, interest in learning.
References
Archambault, J. (2008). The effect of developing kinematics concepts graphically prior to introducing algebraic problem solving techniques. Action Research Required for the Master of Natural Science Degree with Concentration in Physics, Arizona State University.
Badan Pusat Statistik Jawa Timur. (2015). jatim.bps.go.id. Diunduh pada September 2015 dari http://jatim.bps.go.id
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers’ co-regulating learning and practice to foster students’ self-regulated learning through reading. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694
Cahyaningrum, N. I., & Ismaini, Z. (tanpa tahun). Pendekatan regresi tobit pada faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pengeluaran rumah tangga untuk pendidikan di Jawa Timur. Diunduh 22 Juli 2016 dari http://www.digilib.its.ac.id
Creswell, J. (2015). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (H. P. Soetjipto & S. M. Soetjipto, Penerj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ekanem, E., James, E., Okon, & Uduak, I. Ekpoh. (2012). Reforming education through user fees: Ability and willingness to pay for university education in Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(8).
Faisal, I. M. A. (2014). The influence of parental socioeconomic status on their involvement at home. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(5).
Faisal, J. (2008). Strategi dan arah pengembangan sekolah unggulan. Diunduh Maret 2016 dari http://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/
Fakayode, S. O. (2014). Guided-inquiry laboratory experiments in the analytical chemistry laboratory curriculum. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 406, 1267–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7515-8
Fattah, N. (2012). Ekonomi dan pembiayaan pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda.
Halo Malang. (2013, 31 Januari). MCW: Biaya pendidikan paling dikeluhkan. Diunduh September 2015 dari http://halomalang.com
Hartini, T. I., Kusdiwelirawan, A., & Fitriana, I. (2014). Pengaruh berpikir kreatif dengan model problem-based learning terhadap prestasi belajar fisika siswa dengan menggunakan tes open ended. JPII, 3(1), 8–11.
Hermawati, N. W. M. (2012). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terhadap penguasaan konsep biologi dan sikap ilmiah siswa SMA ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 1–30.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hurlock, E. (1995). Psikologi perkembangan: Suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan (Terjemahan). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Jingan, M. L. (2012). Ekonomi pembangunan dan perencanaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Karthwohl, D. R., Crikshank, K. A., Raths, J., Pintrich, P. R., Airasian, P. W., Anderson, L. W., Mayer, R. E., & Wittorck, M. C. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Pearson Education.
Khasanah, N. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi orang tua dalam pengambilan keputusan memilih sekolah dasar swasta. Satya Widya, 28(2), 137–146.
Khusaini, M. (2013). Ekonomi mikro: Dasar-dasar teori. Malang: UB Press.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Meliawati, Triastono, & Masjhudi. (2014). Survei pelaksanaan lintas minat pada mata pelajaran biologi beserta analisis kendala pelaksanaan di SMA Negeri se-Kota Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics. American Journal of Physics, 70(7).
Muldayanti, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran biologi model STAD dan TGT ditinjau dari keingintahuan dan minat belajar siswa. JPII, 2(1), 12–17.
Nurhadi, & Saino. (2015). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan orang tua memilih lembaga pendidikan taman kanak-kanak Islam terpadu. Jurnal Pendidikan Tata Niaga, 3(3).
Paul, G., & Glewwe, P. (1989). The willingness to pay for education in developing countries (LSMS Working Paper No. 54).
Permata, M. R. (2012). Analisa ability to pay dan willingness to pay pengguna jasa kereta api bandara Soekarno-Hatta – Manggarai (Tesis). Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia. Diunduh Juni 2016 dari http://www.lib.ui.ac.id
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 12 Tahun 2015 tentang Program Indonesia Pintar. Diunduh Juli 2016 dari http://dindik.babelprov.go.id
Priambodo, L. H., & Najib, M. (2014). Analisis kesediaan membayar sayuran organik dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 5(1).
P.T. Dardela Y. G. (2009). Ability to pay (ATP)/Willingness to pay (WTP). Diunduh September 2015 dari http://www.dardela.com
Roll, I., Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., Perkins, K., & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the impact of guiding inquiry: The relationship between directive support, student attributes, and transfer of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 46, 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9437-x
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, G. H. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16, 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
Seraphin, K. D., Philippoff, J., Parisky, A., Degnan, K., & Warren, D. P. (2013). Teaching energy science as inquiry: Reflection on professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9389-5
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2013). Pembangunan ekonomi di dunia ketiga. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.