Email this article Using 5E Learning Cycle-Based Laboratory Activity in Improving Students’ Problem Solving Skills on Mixture Separation Topic
), Chansyanah Diawati(2), Reni Meidayanti(3), M. Mahfudz Fauzi Syamsuri(4)
| 
Country:
(1) University of Lampung, Indonesia
(2) University of Lampung, Indonesia
(3) SMKN 8 Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
(4) University of Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpp.v9.i2.201922
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2019 Noor Fadiawati, Chansyanah Diawati, Reni Meidayanti, M. Mahfudz Fauzi Syamsuri
Using 5E learning cycle-based laboratory activity in improving students’ problem solving skills on mixture separation topic. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the effectivity of laboratory activity on mixture separation topic based on 5E learning cycle to improve students’ problem solving skills. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was carried out in the SMPN 33 Bandar Lampung by using the matching only pretest-posttest control group design. The 7th-D and the 7th-E grade were used as experimental and control classes, respectively, which they were obtained by using purposive sampling technique. Findings: The effectivity of 5E learning cycle-based laboratory activity measured based on the n-gainand the effect size values. The n-gain value of experimental and control classes were in medium (0.52) and low (0.29) categorized, respectively. The effect size value was in large categorized (0.67). Conclusion: These results indicated that 5E learning cycle-based laboratory activity could be effective to improve students’ problem solving skills to separate of mixture.
Keywords: problem solving skills, laboratory activity, 5E learning cycle.
Apriyani, T. D., Fadiawati, N., & Syamsuri, M. M. F. (2019). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on the hoax information to improve students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 3(1), 15–22.
Arimbawa, P., Sadia, I. W., & Tika, I. N. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek (MPBP) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah IPA sehari-hari ditinjau dari motivasi berprestasi siswa. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1), 1–11.
Bancual, R. F., & Ricafort, J. D. (2019). Laboratory practices in junior high school science teachers. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 9(6), 22845–22854.
Baygin, M., Yetis, H., Karaköse, M., & Akin, E. (2016). An effect analysis of industry 4.0 to higher education. In Proceeding of 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1–4). Istanbul, Turkey.
Benešová, A., Hirman, M., Steiner, F., & Tupa, J. (2018). Analysis of education requirements for electronics manufacturing within concept industry 4.0. In International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE) (pp. 1–5). Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. In 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM 2017) (pp. 2195–2202). Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Beyer, B. K. (1995). Critical thinking. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Borthick, A. F., & Jones, D. R. (2000). The motivation for collaborative discovery learning online and its applications in an information system assurance course. Issues in Accounting Education, 2(2), 15–22.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powel, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5Es instructional model: Origin and effectiveness. Colorado: Mark Dabling Boulevard.
Duangpummet, P., Chaiyen, P., & Chenprakhon, P. (2019). Lipase-catalyzed esterification: An inquiry-based laboratory activity to promote high school students’ understanding and positive perceptions of green chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1205–1211.
Foshay, R., & Kirkley, J. (2003). Principles for teaching problem solving. Bloomington: Plato Learning, Inc.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Issues and Answers Report, 98, 26–27.
Ginsburg, H. P., & Opper, S. (1998). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
IEA. (2019). Science-Fourth Grade TIMSS 2015 International Science Achievement. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wp-content/uploads/file-base/science/1.-studentachievement/1_0_4_science-studentachievement-infographic-grade-4.pdf
Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2012). Developing a laboratory activity on electrochemical cell by using 5E learning model for teaching and improving science process skills. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 77(10), 121–130.
Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2014). Developing a laboratory activity by using 5E learning model on student learning of factors affecting the reaction rate and improving scientific process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 663–668.
Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Mgiba, A. N. (2014). Exploring grade 7 science teachers’ perceptions regarding practical work in Limpopo, South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 399–405.
Lohajinda, N., Pathumsara, K., & Teeka, C. (2019). Teaching specific heat using learning by laboratory activity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2081(1), 030016 (pp. 1–8).
Marjan, J., Arnyana, I. B. P., Setiawan, I. G. A. N., & Si, M. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran pendekatan saintifik terhadap hasil belajar biologi dan keterampilan proses sains siswa MA Mu’allimat NW Pancor Selong Kabupaten Lombok Timur Nusa Tenggara Barat. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Ganesha, 4(1), 1–12.
Markos, S., & Sridevi, S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89–96.
McMahon, P. E., McMahon, R. F., & Khomtchouk, B. B. (2019). Survival guide to general chemistry. New York: CRC Press.
Minium, E. W., King, B. M., & Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
NCES. (2019). Selected findings from TIMSS 2015. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/timss/timss2015/xls/timss2015_alltables.xlsx
Nugroho, E. B. P., Budiasih, E., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2013). Pengembangan buku petunjuk praktikum kimia SMA/MA Kelas X Semester 2 berbasis learning cycle 5E. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(2), 1–7.
OECD. (2018). Programme for International Student Assessment. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Number 20 about the standard of graduate competency. Jakarta: The Minister of Education and Culture.
Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Number 37 about amendment regulation of the minister of education and culture number 24 in 2016 concerning core competencies and basic competencies SD/MI, SMP/MTs, and SMA/MA. Jakarta: The Minister of Education and Culture.
Research Center of Education. (2016). Hasil PISA tahun 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, dan 2015. Jakarta: The Minister of Education and Culture.
Riedesel, C. A. (1990). Teaching elementary school mathematics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Robertson, L., Dunlap, E., Nivens, R., & Barnett, K. (2019). Sailing into integration: Planning and implementing integrated 5E learning cycles. Science and Children, 57(1), 61–67.
Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 48.
Simon, H. A. (1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology, 7(2), 268–288.
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size – or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282.
Stensvold, M. S., & Wilson, J. T. (1990). The interaction of verbal ability with concept mapping in learning from a chemistry laboratory activity. Science Education, 74(4), 473–480.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats