Email this article Identification of Scientific Literacy of Elementary School Students in Central Lampung District
), Nina Kadaritna(2), Undang Rosidin(3), Novinta Nurul Sari(4) (1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2020 Ismi Rakhmawati, Nina Kadaritna, Undang Rosidin, Novinta Nurul Sari
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
Identification of Scientific Literacy of Elementary School Students in Central Lampung District. Objective: Identify scientific literacy skills of elementary school students that can be actualized in the form of local government policies. Method: This descriptive study involved 36 schools with a total of 380 Elementary School students in Lampung Tengah District obtained using purposive sampling technique. Students examined with scientific literacy questions adapted from PISA (Programs for International Student Assessment) question items and scientific literacy data are analyzed descriptively. Findings: The research data shows that students who understand concepts of science are only 16.07%, misconcept are 8.6%, mistaken are 37.5%, and not understand are 37.8%. Elementary students who understand the concepts of science are still fewin all knowledge categories which are factual category 16.75%, conceptual 16.08%, and procedural 13.5%. Conclusion: Elementary students’ scientific literacy in Central Lampung is still in the low category.
Keywords: scientific literacy, elementary school students, descriptive study.
References
Anagnostopoulou, K., Hatzinikita, V., & Christidou, V. (2012). PISA and Biology school textbooks: The role of visual material. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1839–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012. 05.389
Apriani, S., Sudin, A., & Panjaitan, R. L. (2017). Penerapan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains pada materi perubahan sifat benda [Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) to improve science process skills on material changes in the nature of objects]. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 2(1), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpi.v2i1.10675
Asyhari, A. (2015). Profil peningkatan kemampuan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran saintifik [Profile of increasing students' scientific literacy skills through scientific learning]. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 4(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni. v4i2.91
Avikasari, A., Rukayah, R., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The influence of science literacy- based teaching material towards science achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). https://doi.org/10.11591/ ijere.v7i3.14033
Becker, F. G. (2015). Description of the released unit from the 2015 PISA collaborative problem solving assessment, collaborative problem- solving skills, and proficiency levels. Washington: OECD.
Bellová, R., Melicherèíková, D., & Tomèík, P. (2018). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los angeles: SAGE.
Darmawan, I. P. A., & Sujoko, E. (2013). Revisi taksonomi pembelajaran Benyamin S. Bloom [Revised learning taxonomy of Benjamin S. Bloom]. Satya Widya, 29(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2013. v29.i1.p30-39
Ernawati, Y., Pambudi,A., Pratama, A., Aditama, A., Devi, K., Nadia, P., … Miftahussururi. (2019). Neraca pendidikan daerah 2019 [Regional education balance 2019]. Retrieved from https://npd.kemdikbud. go.id/
Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/ 10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245
Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian students in the context of TIMSS and Pisa has not ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393–406.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Fu’adah, H., Rusilowati, A., & Hartono, H. (2017). Pengembangan alat evaluasi literasi sains untuk mengukur kemampuan literasi [Development of a science literacy evaluation tool to measure literacy skills]. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 46, 51–59.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi. org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Herlanti, Y., Mardiati, Y., Rahmawati, R., Putri, A. M. K., Jamil, N., Miftahuzzakiyah, M.,… Sugiarti, S. (2019). Finding learning strategy in improving science literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.30870/ jppi.v5i1.4902
Jgunkola, B. J., & Ogunkola, B. J. (2013). Scientific literacy: Conceptual overview, importance and strategies for improvement. Journal of Educationai and Sociai Research, 3(1), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1 p265
Kristyowati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Pembelajaran literasi sains melalui pemanfaatan lingkungan [Learning scientific literacy through the use of the environment]. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.24246/ j.js.2019.v9.i2.p183-191
Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA result and impact on the reading learning program in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 297, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing, 64. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/ PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations FINAL PDF.pdf
Ozdem, Y., Cavas, P., Cavas, B., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2006). An investigation of elementary students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1), 6–20.
Pine, K., Messer, D., & John, K. S. (2016). Research in science and technological education childrens’ misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers ’ views. Science, 5143, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120 04624
Ratini, Muchtar, H., Suparman, M. A., Tamuri, A. H., & Susanto, E. (2018). The influence of learning models and learning reliance on students’ scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12489
She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1
Smith, K. V., Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Dimitrakopoulos, C. (2012). Developing scientific literacy in a Primary School. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.565088
Sudarmani, Rosana, D., & Pujianto. (2018). Lesson learned: Improving students’ procedural and conceptual knowledge through Physics instruction with Media of wave, sound, and light. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/ 1/012033
Taylor, S., Bogdan, R., & Devault, M. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New Jersey: Wiley.
Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553–559.
Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(6), 626–631.
Udompong, L., Traiwichitkhun, D., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal model of research competencyvia scientific literacy of teacher and student. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2001), 1581–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2014.01.438
Widowati, A., Widodo, E., Anjarsari, P., & Setuju. (2017). The development of scientific literacy through nature of science (NoS) within inquiry based learning approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909(1). https:// doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012067
Yang, W., & Fan, G. (2019). Post-PISA education reforms in China: Policy response beyond the digital governance of PISA. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878557
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats