Email this article Tourism Geography Learning Process in 21st Century Competencies Efforts for Geography Education Students
(1) Universitas Lampung
(2) Universitas Lampung
(3) Universitas Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Tourism Geography Learning Process in 21st Century Competencies Effort for Geography Education Students. Objectives: This research aims to find the content of 21st century competencies in the learning process of tourism geography subject. Methods: It is a qualitative research and data collection techniques are observation, interview, and documentation. The subjects are 14 students who were divided into students from villages and cities.. Findings: The results showed that the learning process from the curriculum aspect and the tourism geography learning process has formed the character of collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking, but the content of communication competence has not been maximally formed. In addition, students from rural areas tend to have better cooperative and social care characteristics than urban students. Conclusion: The tourism geography learning process has formed the character of students in accordance with 21st century competencies, namely collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking, but personality factors and habits from the area of origin also influence the development of student character during college.
Keywords: 21st century education, student character, character education.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, R. (2012). Pembelajaran berbasis pemanfaatan sumber belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, XII(2), 216–231.
Astuti, A. P., Aziz, A., Sumarti, S. S., & Anggani, D. (2019). Preparing 21st Century Teachers/: Implementation of 4C Character’s Pre-Service Teacher through Teaching Practice. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012109
Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Dil Ve Dilbilimi Çalýþmalarý Dergisi, 15(1), 231–246.
Bintarto, R. (1979). Pengantar Geografi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Geografi UGM.
Campbell, S. (2014). What is qualitative research? Clinical Laboratory Science, 27(1), 3.
Davidson, M., Khmelkov, V., & Lickona, T. (2010). The power of character: Needed for, and developed from, teaching and learning. In International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 427–454). Springer.
Dharmawan, N. S. (2014). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa Pada Mahasiswa Di Perguruan Tinggi. Makalah Disampaikan Pada Pembinaan Pendidikan Karakter Bagi Mahasiswa PTS Di Lingkungan Kopertis Wilayah VIII.
Echao, O. F. S., & Romero, M. (2017). Creative and collaborative problem solving development through serious games co-creation. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 793–797). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27.
Foo, S. Y., & Quek, C. L. (2019). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking through Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Literature Review. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 37–58.
Harper, D. (2011). Choosing a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy, 83–98.
Jahroh, W. S., & Sutarna, N. (2016). Pendidikan Karakter Sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Degradasi Moral. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan, 395–402.
Kivunja, C. (2014). Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens’ Digital Connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 81–91.
Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43.
Opielka, M. (2019). Gesellschaftliche in Gemeinschaft bei Talcott Parsons und Hegel. In Handbuch Kommunitarismus (pp. 101–119). Springer.
Purwendah, E. K. (2020). Persepsi Budaya Hukum dalam Merespon Pencemaran Minyak di Laut Cilacap akibat Kapal Tanker dalam Perspektif Keadilan Ekososial. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 8(1), 93–105.
Putra, C. A. (2017). Utilization of Gadget Technology as a Learning Media. BITNET: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI, 2(2).
Silber Varod, V., Eshet Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3099–3118.
Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhendi, H. Y., Ramdhani, M. A., & Irwansyah, F. S. (2018). Verification Concept of Assesment for Physics Education Student Learning Outcome. International Journal of Engineering & Technology (UEA), 7(3.21), 321–325.
Sukardi, H. M. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suyanto, S. (2009). Urgensi Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.