Email this article Analisis Tipe Hambatan Belajar dan Kesalahan Jawaban Matematika Siswa SMP Pada Konsep Bangun Segiempat dan Alternatif Penyelesaiannya
), Budiyono Budiyono(2), Riyadi Riyadi(3) (1) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2018 Aulia Musla Mustika, Budiyono Budiyono, Riyadi Riyadi
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
Analysis of Student’s Learning Obstacle Type and Wrongness Mathematical Answer of Rectangle Concept and its Altenative Solution. The aim of this study is to analyze the student’s learning obstacle and wrongness mathematical answer on the concept of rectangle. The study involved 28 junior high school students in Surakarta, Central Java, using a quantitative method. Based on the results of data analysis, identified 5 types of student’s learning obstacles based on their answers, that were variation information, concept image, relation between rectangle’s area and circumference, student’s ability to answerthe task, and relation between one concept to anothers . One alternative to overcome the learning obstacle and wrongness mathematical answer was by applying the didactic design which were consisted of RPP, Student Worksheet as well as Prediction of Response and Anticipation Didactic.
Key Words: Learning obstacle, wrongness mathematical answer, didactic design
References
Ciltas, A. & Tatar, E. 2011. Diagnosing Learning Difficulties Related to the Equation and Inequality that Contain Terms with Absolute Value. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 461-473.
Nuharini, D. & Wahyuni, T. 2008. Matematika Konsep dan Aplikasinya untuk VII SMP dan MTs. Surakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Ruthven, K.et all. (2009). Design Tools in Didactical Research:: Instrumenting the Epistemological and Cognitive Aspects of the Design of Teaching Sequences. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER 38; 329.
Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical thinking and learning, 6(2), 91-104.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Suherman, E., Herman, T., Nurjanah, Prabawanto, S., Suryadi, D., Suherman, Rohayati, A., Turmudi. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI. Syaban. 2009. Menumbuhkembangkan Daya dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas melalui Pembelajaran Investigasi. Educationist, 3(2), 129-136.
Tall, D. & Razali, M.R. 1993. Diagnosing students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol.24 (No.2). pp. 209-222.
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The. Warfield, V. A. (2006). Invitation to Didactique. University of Washington
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats