Email this article Implementation and Strengthening of Visible Learning for Elementary School Students’ in Indonesia
), Sri Buwono(2), Hadi Wiyono(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Tanjungpura,
Corresponding Author
Implementation and Strengthening of Visible Learning for Elementary School Students in Indonesia. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to describe the strengthening of visible learning in basic education students. Methods: This research uses mixed methods, namely quantitative and qualitative methods. The participants were elementary and junior high school teachers in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province with a total sample of 50 teachers. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and interviews. Analysis of the data using correlation analysis techniques Moment Product and t-test. Findings: The results of the study found that the implementation of six variables, four variables in the very good category and two in the good category. The relationship between variables between r values of 0.470 to 0.808 shows a strong and positive relationship. Interest analysis shows that the overall value of the variables is very important, and the variables that need strengthening are the variables of students, homes and teaching approaches. Conclusion: The implementation of visible learning factors for elementary education students has been implemented well and very well.
Keywords: visible learning, elemenetary school students, mixed method
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202101
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2010). Pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan assesment. [Learning, teaching, and assessment]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Atmaja, T. S., Dewantara, J. A., & Utomo, B. B. (2020). Penguatan pendidikan karakter berbasis sekolah menengah atas perbatasan entikong kalimantan barat [Strengthening character education based on entikong border high school, west kalimantan]. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1257–1266.
Blyth, N. & Hunter, D. (2017). Improving teacher clarity/ : enacting visible learning theory into action.
Penrhos College Dewitt, P. (2018). Using visible learning research to influence collaborative leadership. Education Sciences, 8(4). 219, 1-9.
Donohoo, J., Bryen, S., & Weishar, B. (2018). Implementing high-leverage influences from the visible learning synthesis: Six supporting conditions. Education Sciences, 8(4). 215, 1-12
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning for literacy: implementing the practices that work best to accelerate student learning grades k-12. California: Corwin Literacy.
Hattie, J. (2008). Invisible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: maximising impact on learning. London and New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J., Masters, D., & Birch, K. (2016). Visible learning into action: international case studies of impact. New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. London and New York: Routledge.
Ivan, S., John, O., John, C., O’neill, A. M., & Roger, O. (2009). Commentary invisible learnings? a commentary on john hattie’s book: visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 44(1), 93–106.
Knight, J. (2019). Instructional coaching for implementing visible learning: a model for translating research into practice. Education Sciences, 9(2). 101, 1-16
Larsen, S. N. (2019). Blindness in seeing: a philosophical critique of the visual learning paradigm in education. Education Sciences, 9(1), 47, 1–12.
Lopez-Fernandez, O., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2011). The use of mixed methods research in interdisciplinary educational journals. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(2), 269–283.
McKnight, L., & Whitburn, B. (2020). Seven reasons to question the sovereignty of Visible Learning. Discourse, 41(1), 32 44.
Mezi, M., & Dewantara, J. A. (2020). Implementation of character education in the student council. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 765–774.
Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: an opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 37–38.
Nurgiansah, T. H., Dewantara, A., & Rachman, F. (2020). The implementation of character education in the civics education syllabus at sma negeri 1 sleman. JED (Journal of Etika Demokrasi), 5(2), 110–121.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organising research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
Qvortrup, L. (2019). Visible learning and its enemies–the missing link. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5(1), 1-5.
Raiyn, J. (2016). The role of visual learning in improving students’ high-order thinking skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 115–121. http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112894.pdf Rømer, T. A. (2019). A critique of john hattie’s theory of visible learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(6), 587–598.
Sharp, L., Dougherty, J., Baca, G., & Diego Medrano, E. (2016). The implementation of visible learning practices among refugee learners in north-west texas. Diversity, Social Justice, and the Educational Leader, 1(2), 26-39
Terhart, E. (2011). Has john hattie found the holy grail of research on teaching? an extended review of visible learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 425–438.
No supplementary information available.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats