Email this article Academic Performance and Perception of Learners in Technology Subjects: A Flexible Learning Assessment
), Lester Lou Benguar Segumpan@gmail.com(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Central Mindanao University, Philippines
(2) Central Mindanao University, Philippines
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202346
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Shiela Mae Icalina Segumpan, Lester Lou Benguar Segumpan@gmail.com
Academic Performance and Perception of Learners in Technology Subjects: A Flexible Learning Assessment. This study compared the academic performance of the learners in flexible learning (FL) and face-to-face and determined the correlation of student perceptions and academic performance of the students in Technology subjects. The longitudinal and descriptive correlation research design were employed. Descriptive statistics was used to assess the learners' academic performance and ascertain their perception in FL. The paired-sample t-test was utilized to determine if there's a significant difference in the learners' academic performance. The Pearson Coefficient Binomial Correlation was used to determine if there's a significant relationship between their perception and academic performance. The results showed that their academic performance is very high, both FL and face-to-face. Also, the results revealed no significant difference in the learners' academic performance. Finally, the learners' perception is moderate, showing no significant relationship between the learners' perception and academic performance in FL.
Keywords: flexible learning, academic performance, perception.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202346
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292. doi:10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292
Bansal, D. (2016). Benefits of ICT in Education. A quarterly peer reviewed International Journal of Research & Education, 5(2), 1-5.
Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students perception of mobile learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University Student Perspective.
Branzuela Jr, N. F., San Diego, A. L., & Namoco, S. O. A (2022). A multiple regression analysis of the factors affecting academic performance of computer-aided designing students during flexible learning programin Philippine State Universities. Science International. 34(6), 525-530
Cassidy, A., Fu, G., Valley, W., Lomas, C., Jovel, E. & Riseman, A. (2016). Flexible Learning strategies in first through fourth-year courses. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching. 9. 83. 10.22329/celt.v9i0.4438.
Ciroma, Z. I. (2014). ICT and education: Issues and challenges. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n26p98
Cloete, A. L. (2017). Technology and education: Challenges and opportunities. HTS: Theological Studies, 73(3), 1-7.
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367.
Cybinski, P., & Selvanathan, S. (2005). Learning experience and learning effectiveness in undergraduate statistics: Modeling performance in traditional and flexible learning environments. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(2), 251-271.
Das, K. (2019). The role and impact of ICT in improving the quality of education: An overview. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities, 4(6), 97-103.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. doi:10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Dyment, J., Downing, J., Hill, A., & Smith, H. (2018). ‘I did think it was a bit strange taking outdoor education online’: exploration of initial teacher education students’ online learning experiences in a tertiary outdoor education unit. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(1), 70-85.
Gossenheimer, A. N., Bem, T., Carneiro, M. L., & De Castro, M. S. (2017). Impact of distance education on academic performance in a pharmaceutical care course. PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0175117. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175117
Hernandez, R. M. (2017). Impact of ICT on Education: challenges and perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones, 5(1), 337-347.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Hudson, R., Lyn, O., & Maslin-Prothero, S. (2014). flexible learning in action: case study in higher education. Routledge.
Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27-38.
Joan, D. (2013). Flexible learning as new learning design in the classroom process to promote quality education. Journal on School Educational Technology, v9 n1 p37-42
Johnson, D., & Palmer, C. C. (2014). Comparing student assessments and perceptions of online and face-to-face versions of an introductory linguistics course. Online Learning, 19(2). doi:10.24059/olj.v19i2.449
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. doi:10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1278.
Krishnan, S. (2016). Students' perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 32-41.
Li, X. (2013). Information and communication technology in education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 9(1), 1-11. doi:10.4018/jicte.2013010101
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. Y. Y. (2018). Revisiting the definitions and implementation of flexible learning. Innovations in open and flexible education, 3-13.
Li, X., Yang, Y., Chu, S. K. W., Zainuddin, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Applying blended synchronous teaching and learning for flexible learning in higher education: An action research study at a university in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education,
Lo, C.-M., Han, J., Wong, E.S.W. and Tang, C.-C. (2021), "Flexible learning with multi-component blended learning mode for undergraduate chemistry courses in the pandemic of COVID-19", Interactive Technology and Smart Education, https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0061
MacCann, C., Jiang, Y., Brown, L. E., Double, K. S., Bucich, M., & Minbashian, A. (2020). Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 150-186. doi:10.1037/bul0000219
Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of online learning and teaching, 11(2), 309-319.
Pagtulon-An, E. A., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Students' Mathematics Performance and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in a Rich Assessment Tasks Environment. Asian Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary.5(2), 54-64
Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33-35.
Reimers, F. M. (2021). Primary and secondary education during COVID-19: Disruptions to educational opportunity during a pandemic. Springer Nature.
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
Ruto, L. K. (2022). "Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in science, technology, English and mathematics (STEM) teaching and learning in African digital schools initiative (ADSI) schools in Narok County." World Journal of Innovative Research, 13(1), 9-9. doi:10.31871/wjir.13.1.9
Segumpan, S. (2021). The academic performance and engagement in physics among grade 9 learners using flipped classroom. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies. 8(2), 1-15
Segumpan, S. & Alava, W. (2022). Instructional e-package on digital tools: building digital competence for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies. 9(6), 22-47
Spitzer, M. W. H., & Musslick, S. (2021). Academic performance of K-12 students in an online-learning environment for mathematics increased during the shutdown of schools in wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(8), e0255629.
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0063. doi:10.29333/pr/7947
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2020). handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak, Ver 1.2.
Wagner, S. C., Garippo, S. J., & Lovaas, P. (2011). A longitudinal comparison of online versus traditional instruction. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 68-73.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats