Integration of Agrarian Literacy in Citizenship Education

Dwi Wulan Titik Andari(1,Mail), Dian Aries Mujiburohman(2)

(1) Department of Land, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Department of Land, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Indonesia, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

Copyright (c) 2025 Dwi Wulan Titik Andari, Dian Aries Mujiburohman
Article Metrics→
  
Indexing Database→

10.23960/jpp.v15i2.pp1061-1074

Download Full Text: PDF

Abstract

Integration of Agrarian Literacy in Citizenship Education. Objective: This study aims to formulate an integration model of land literacy within social education to enhance students’ critical awareness and serve as a preventive strategy against agrarian conflict in Indonesia. Method: This qualitative literature analysis draws on Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy to combine recent empirical findings with agrarian policy advances. Finding: Apart from unequal land ownership, the study shows those agrarian conflicts result from young people's ignorance of land rights, legal procedures, and history. Civic education in schools also emphasizes excessive memorization and fails to connect with students' local realities. The current curriculum does not address local agrarian issues, and teaching methods are mostly one-sided, failing to encourage critical thinking or active participation from students. To address this, the study suggests a model for agrarian literacy that includes three key components: (1) a curriculum that covers local agrarian topics like customary rights, land disputes, and agrarian law; (2) engaging learning methods like project-based learning and real-life case studies of land conflicts; and (3) partnerships with organizations like the National Land Agency, traditional institutions, and non-governmental organizations in the agrarian field. Conclusion: Agrarian literacy is an important citizenship competency that helps form citizens who are legally aware, sensitive to social justice, and capable of actively resolving land conflicts. Therefore, agrarian literacy needs to be systematically integrated into the national education framework.

 

Keywords: land literacy, civic education, agrarian conflict, critical pedagogy, civic engagement.

References

Adiansah, W., Nulhaqim, S. A., & Basyar, G. G. K. (2021). Resolusi konflik berbasis komunitas melalui pengembangan masyarakat sebagai upaya alternatif resolusi konflik agraria. Share : Social Work Journal, 10(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v10i2.31200

Albertus, M., & Klaus, K. (2024). Land and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 28, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040623-112955

Alexandre, B. H. G., Ferronato, R. F., Lima, A. B., Pontes, F. G. A., & Lima, O. D. S. F. C. (2024). Paulo freire e a pedagogia do oprimido: reflexões sobre a educação crítica e transformadora. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 26(11), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2611071221

Amaliyah, A., Ma’ruf, M. A., Sary, N., & Bitu, S. G. (2021). Reforma Agraria dan Penanganan Sengketa Tanah. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v5i1.4892

Bartlett, T., & Schugurensky, D. (2021). Reinventing Freire in the 21st century: Current Issues in Comparative Education, 23(2), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v23i2.8571

Boche, B., Bartels, S., & Wassilak, D. (2021). Reimagining an elementary teacher education preparation program: Striving for integrated teaching. Educational Considerations, 47(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2254

Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2024). Land and social life. In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.51

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology,Qualitative Research in Psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Deshpande, S. S., Sen, S., Mendanha, G., Raheja, R., Bajaj, K., Moorthy, A., Bisht, K., Cherian, S., Nair, S., Mathur, N., & Kodamarti, M. (2024). Curriculum and Community with research, action and service (CCBALwRAS), a Pedagogical Shift for Social Change. Higher Education for the Future, 11(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311231210636

Dhiaulhaq, A., & McCarthy, J. F. (2020). Indigenous rights and agrarian justice framings in forest land conflicts in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670243

Fadlillah, M., Oktivianingsih, E., & Lisdayana, N. (2024). The concept of an independent curriculum with an agrarian insight in early childhood: perspectives of indonesian teachers. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1807. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6721

Farrell, L., Eadie, T., McLean Davies, L., & Sandiford, C. (2022). Literacy education for citizenship across the lifespan. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00014-2

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the city. In Behind the Gate. Continuum Intl Pub Group.

Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. ed.). Chapter 1, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Freire, P. (2018). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. In Teachers As Cultural Workers: Letters To Those Who Dare Teach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496974

Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In The Community Performance Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060635-5

Freire, P. (2021a). Education for critical consciousness. In Education for Critical Consciousness. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350190184

Freire, P. (2021b). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. In Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1766207

Gawryla, R. G., & Curry, K. W. (2022). Science citizenship through secondary agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2022.04039

Koninck, R. De, Montesano, M. J., & Rigg, J. (2020). On more than Rural: Textures of Thailand’s Agrarian Transformation. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 35(3), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj35-3e

Lameras, P., Arnab, S., de Freitas, S., Petridis, P., & Dunwell, I. (2021). Science teachers’ experiences of inquiry-based learning through a serious game: a phenomenographic perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 8(7), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00152-z

Lobato Neto, H. (2020). A reforma agrária como instrumento de efetivação da cidadania na pós modernidade. Revista de Direito Agrário e Agroambiental, 6(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.26668/indexlawjournals/2526-0081/2020.v6i1.6483

Lucas, A., & Warren, C. (2003). The state, the people, and their mediators: The struggle over agrarian law reform in post-New Order Indonesia. Indonesia, 76(October), 87–126.

Magee, A., & Pherali, T. J. (2019). Paulo freire and critical consciousness in conflict-affected contexts. Education and Conflict Review, 2, 44–48.

Mufidah, N. (2020). Tinjauan atas perkembangan pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam rumpun ilmu sosial. ASANKA: Journal of Social Science And Education, 1(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v1i1.1948

Muharji, I. (2014). Civics and citizenship teaching in Indonesia. Ethos, 2(2), 34–37.

Mujiburohman, D. A. (2019). Penegakan hukum penertiban dan pendayagunaan tanah terlantar. In STPN Press.

Mujiburohman, D. A. (2021). Transformasi dari kertas ke elektronik: telaah yuridis dan teknis sertipikat tanah elektronik. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 7(1), 57–67.

Nacimento, M. (2023). Plantation life: corporate occupation in Indonesia’s oil palm zone. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(2), 792–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2137627

Nuhidayah, L., Davies, P. J., & Alam, S. (2020). Resolving land-use conflicts over Indonesia’s customary forests: One map, power contestations and social justice. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1355/cs42-3c

Peluso, N. L. (2023). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. In Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. https://doi.org/10.2307/3351093

Peluso, & Nancy Lee. (1992). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. In The Journal of Asian Studies. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911800135764

Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Vázquez Dorrío, J. B. (2020). Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283

Rejekiningsih, T., Triyanto, D., & Kurniawan, I. (2017). Education for agrarian resource management through agrarian citizenship movement in rural areas. 764–772. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.80

Robinson-Pant, A. (2023). Literacy: A lever for citizenship? International Review of Education, 69(1–2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09998-6

Shifflet, R., & Hunt, C. S. (2019). “All teaching should be integration”: social studies and literacy integration in preservice teacher education. The Social Studies, 110(6), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2019.1635978

Sholichah, K. I., Yani, M. T., Harmanto, H., & Suprijono, A. (2024). Implementation of social science theory in civic education for school students. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 5(8), 1038–1047. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v5i8.1004

Springer, S. (2013). Illegal evictions? overwriting possession and orality with law’s violence in C ambodia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(4), 520–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00368.x

Timmer, C. P. (2016). Land and development in indonesia: searching for the people’s sovereignty. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1226231

Vallera, F. L., & Bodzin, A. M. (2020). Integrating STEM with AgLIT (agricultural literacy through innovative technology): the efficacy of a project-based curriculum for upper-primary students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09979-y

Vel, J., & Makambombu, S. (2019). Strategic framing of adat in land-acquisition politics in east Sumba. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670239

Yasa, P. G. A. S., Sudiarawan, K. A., Dwijayanthi, P. T., & Pranajaya, M. D. (2021). Legal politics of land rights certification in the indonesian context: between agrarian conflicts and demands for legal certainty. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 897–905. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.106

Yunus, R., Askrening, A., Ramdhona, R., Ristiyono, M. P., & Simanjuntak, R. (2024). Application of the model of integrated learning to colleges: a review. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.166

Zacharias, V. J. (2024). Penyelesaian sengketa perdata tentang tanah dalam perspektif hukum agraria di Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 7(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v7i1.12342


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats