Development of a Web-Based Assessment of Pancasila Student Character in Senior High Schools

Salahuddin Salahuddin; Erniati Erniati; Wiwin Mistiani; Gusnarib Gusnarib; A. Ardiansyah

doi:10.23960/jpp.v15i2.pp945-965

Development of a Web-Based Assessment of Pancasila Student Character in Senior High Schools

Salahuddin Salahuddin⁽¹⁾, Erniati Erniati⁽²⁾, Wiwin Mistiani^(3,), Gusnarib Gusnarib⁽⁴⁾, A. Ardiansyah⁽⁵⁾

⁽¹⁾ Department of Teacher Professional Education, State Islamic University of Palu, Indonesia, Indonesia
⁽²⁾ Department of Islamic Religious Education, Datokarama State Islamic University of Palu, Indonesia, Indonesia
⁽³⁾ Department of Islamic Religious Education, Datokarama State Islamic University of Palu, Indonesia, Indonesia
⁽⁴⁾ Department of Islamic Religious Education, Datokarama State Islamic University of Palu, Indonesia, Indonesia
⁽⁵⁾ Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, State Islamic University of Palu, Indonesia, Indonesia

Corresponding Author

Article Metrics→

Indexing Database→

10.23960/jpp.v15i2.pp945-965

Download Full Text:

Abstract

Development of Web-Based Assessment for Pancasila Student Character in Senior High Schools: This study aims to develop a web-based student character assessment system oriented toward the Pancasila Student Profile for the Senior High School level. The system integrates three assessment methods teacher assessment, peer assessment, and self-assessment to gather comprehensive and objective data about student character. The instrument used in this system is based on six core dimensions of the Pancasila Student Profile: faith and devotion to God Almighty, global diversity, cooperation, independence, critical reasoning, and creativity. Each dimension includes five indicators, resulting in 30 items in total. Instrument development followed the Orindo & Antonio (1984) model, while the web system design adopted principles from Martin & Betrus (2019), emphasizing digital efficiency and functional design. Research findings show the developed system is valid, reliable, and efficient. Content validity testing yielded an average Aiken’s index of 0.882, and construct validity was confirmed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with satisfactory model fit results (p ≥ 0.05; RMSEA ≤ 0.08; CFI, TLI, IFI ≥ 0.95; factor loadings > 0.3). All six dimensions showed Composite Reliability (CR) scores above 0.7, and Cronbach’s Alpha reached 0.859, indicating strong internal consistency.The system was built using PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and MySQL. Expert validation yielded an average Aiken’s index of 0.941, affirming its visual and functional quality. A practicality test with 50 teachers produced an average score of 86%, indicating the system is highly practical. Integration of multiple assessment types allows for data triangulation and comprehensive character evaluation. The system supports teachers in assessing and fostering character, simplifies the process, enhances transparency, and enables real-time data analysis, offering a scalable and effective digital solution for character education in Senior high schools.

Keyword: web based assessment, character, pancasila student, EFA, CFA.

References

Abass, O. A., Olajide, S. A., & Samuel, B. O. (2017). Development of web-based examination system using open source programming model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306555

Abidin, A. Z., Istiyono, E., Fadilah, N., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019). A computerized adaptive test for measuring the physics critical thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19642

AERA. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Education Research Association.

Agboola, A., & Tsai, K. C. (2012). Bring character education into classroom. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(2),163–170. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.2.163

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142.

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Rosda Karya.

Alimorad, Z., & Saleki, A. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of web-based assessment in EFL courses as perceived by different stakeholders. Applied Research on English Language, 11(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2021.129367.1874

Allen, M. J. dan W. M. Y. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory (1st ed.). Waveland Press.

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using eassessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.10 08

Alwi, A., Mehat, M., Izza Arshad, N., Mohd Ariffin, M., & K. Sugathan, S. (2018). Empowering the teaching of malaysian indigenous language via knowledge sharing. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.20), 21. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.18725

Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The instrument development to evaluate local curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 1(14), 921–934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11458a

Antal, M., & Koncz, S. (2011). Student modeling for a web-based self-assessment system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5559–5566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.05

Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos user’s guide version 3.6. SmallWaters Corporation.

Asmaranti, W., Syafdi, M. & Dewi, R. (2016). Pengembangan computer based test (cbt) untuk mengukur kemampuan pemahaman instrumental pada materi segiempat dan segitiga siswa kelas VII SMP. Universitas Bengkulu.

Austin, Z., Gregory, P. A. M., & Chiu, S. (2008). Use of reflection-in-action and self-assessment to promote critical thinking among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(3).

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Bunderson, C.V., Inouye, D.K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generation of computerized educational measurement. In Educational Measurement (3rd ed., p. 28). American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing.

Candra. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen nilai kebangsaan mata pelajaran pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan di SMP. In Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Choi, S. W., & Tinkler, T. (2002). Evaluating comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer-based assessment in a K-12 setting. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, October, 1–19.

Faizah, U., Zuchdi, D., & Alsamiri, Y. (2019). An authentic assessment model to assess kindergarten students’ character. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.24588

Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2019). Psychological, educational and measurement.title. Routledge.

Gable R. K. (1986). Instrumen development in the affective domain. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.

Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Edition) by Joseph F. Hair, William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson (z-lib.org).pdf (p. 761).

Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.

Herwin, H., & Mardapi, D. (2017). An emotion assessment model for Elementary School students. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.14504

Hidayat, M., Kurniawan, D. A., Sandra, R. O., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Misconception materials tool: web-based assessment of buoyancy. 6(2), 237–246.

Hobri. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pengembangan. Pena Salsabila.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

Imtihan, N., Zuchdi, D., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Analisis problematika penilaian afektif peserta didik madrasah aliyah. Schemata, 6(1), 63–80.

Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Erfianti, L., & Astuti, W. (2020). Applying CBT in physics learning to measure students’ higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). 1742-6596. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012061

Jayadi, U., Harahap, A. ., & Aslan, A. (2024). Educational Landscape in Indonesia in 2023: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL), 2(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijedl.v2i2.266

Julia, & Supriyadi, T. (2018). The implementation of character education at senior high school. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00085. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200085

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Cengage Learning.

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan., 20(2), 132–141.

Kennedy, G. (2025). Integrating ICT in higher education in liberia: a review of challenges, best practices, and opportunities. Journal of Education and Practice. 16(3),14. https://doi.org/ 10.7176/JEP/16-3-14.

Kim, J., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2018). Investigation of factor structure and measurement invariance by gender for the behavioral and emotional screening system among high school students. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000469

Kirana, K., Studi, P., Dan, P., Pendidikan, E., Pascasarjana, P., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap keberpancasilaan siswa sekolah dasar.

Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2013). Educational testing and measurement. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2016). Test development process. (& T. M. H. Lane, M. R. Raymond (ed.). Routledge.

Lilley, M., Barker, T., & Britton, C. (2004). The development and evaluation of a software prototype for computer-adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 43(1-2 SPEC ISS.), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.008

Martin, F., & Betrus, A. K. K. (2019). Digital media for learning: Theories, processes, and solutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33120-7.

Martin, Florence., and Anthony Karl Betrus. (2019). Digital media for learning. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Mei-Ju, C., Chen-Hsin, Y., & Pin-Chen, H. (2014). The beauty of character education on preschool children’s parent-child relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.431

Mistiani, W., Istiyono, E., Syamsudin, A., & Ghazali, N. H. (2024). Developing a Pancasila students' character instrument: Proof of construct validity and estimation of construct reliability. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i2.44920

Moore, M. T., & Brown, T. A. (2012). Hoyle cfa chapter - final running head : confirmatory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis Timothy A . Brown and Michael T . Moore Correspondence concerning this chapter should be addressed to Timothy A . Brown , Center for Anxiety & Related Disor. July 2012.

Muller, I., Lown, M., Smith, K. A., Woods, C., & Maund, E. (2023). Internet tool to support self-assessment and self-swabbing of sore throat: development and feasibility study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e39791. https://doi.org/10.2196/39791

Nieveen, N. M. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125-135). Kluwer.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of student. Pearson Education, Inc.

Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802170387

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstain, I. . (1994). Psychometric theory (3th Ed). In McGraw-Hili, Inc.

Nurhasanah, N., & Nida, Q. (2016). Character building of students by guidance and counseling teachers through guidance and counseling services. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v4i1.86

O’Malley, K. J., Kirkpatrick, R., Sherwood, W., Burdick, H. J., Hsieh, M.C. &, Sanford, E. E. (2005). Comparability of a Paper Based and Computer Based Reading Test in Early Elementary Grades. Paper Presented at the AERA Division D Graduate Student Seminar.

Oriondo, L. L. & Dallo-Antonio, E. M. (1984). Evaluating educational outcomes (tests, measurement and evaluation). Philippiness: Rex Book Store.

Oriondo, L. L., & Antonio, E. M. (1984). Evaluating educational outcomes (Tesis, measurement and evaluation). Manila: REX Printing Company, INC.

Panadero, Ernesto & Brown, Gavin & Strijbos, Jan-Willem. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review. 28(2), 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2.

Pellegrino, J. W. & Quellmalz, E.S. (2010) 'Perspectives on the Integration of Technology and Assessment'. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (2), 119-134.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (Eds.) (2010). An introduction to educational design research: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. (3rd print ed.) Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (SLO).

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Nugraha, A. C., Arlinwibowo, J., Sulistyaningsih, E., Djidu, H., Apino, E., & Iryanti, H. D. (2017). Implementing the computer-based national examination in Indonesian schools: The challenges and strategies. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 612–633.

Reynolds, C.R., Livingston,Ronald B., & Willson, V. (2013). Measurement and assessment in education. In Pearson. https://doi.org/10.2307/1502911

Rokhaniyah, H., & Putra, O. V. (2021). Developing Web-Based Online Test System To Boost Ielts Academic Reading Score. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i2.4348

Saepuzaman, D. (2023). Model asessment as learning berbasis pemahaman dan hots pada pembelajaran fisika dasar bagi mahasiswa program studi pendidikan fisika. In eprint.uny. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Setiawan, A., Mardapi, D., Supriyoko, & Andrian, D. (2019). The development of instrument for assessing students’ affective domain using self- and peer-assessment models. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12326a

Shih, C.-C., Chiang, D. A., Lai, S.-W., & Hu, Y.-W. (2009). Applying hybrid data mining techniques to web-based self-assessment system of Study and Learning Strategies Inventory. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5523–5532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.132

Shilova, T. V., Artamonova, L. V., & Averina, S. Y. (2014). Computer-based tests as an integral component of an efl course in moodle for non-linguistic students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154(October), 434–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.187

Supramono, A. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian karakter profil pelajar pancasila untuk peserta didik fase b jenjang Sekolah Dasar. In UNY. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Syamsudin, A., Budiyono, B., & Sutrisno, S. (2016). Model of affective assessment of primary school students. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8307

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts ad application. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/s11600-010-0006-9

Tooth, J. A., Nielsen, S., & Armstrong, H. (2013). Coaching effectiveness survey instruments: Taking stock of measuring the immeasurable. Coaching, 6(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2013.802365

Wahyuningsih, S., Zuchron, D., & Purnawinarni, E. (2021). Tunas pancasila sebagai duta profil pelajar pancasila di sekolah dasar. Direktorat Sekolah Dasar, Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi, 1–12.

Warschauer, Mark & Matuchniak, Tina. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education. 34. 179-225. https://doi.org/ 10.3102/0091732X09349791.

Widoyoko. E. P., (2011). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390

Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., Fernández-Castilla, B., Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2022). Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484

Yao, Z., & Enright, R. (2020). The influence of moral stories on kindergarteners’ sharing behaviour. Early Child Development and Care, 190(6), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1499098

Yaumi. (2018). Media dan Teknologi Pembelajaran. Kencana.

Yuniarti, Felintina, Pramesti Dewi, R. Susanti. (2012). Pengembangan virtual laboratory sebagai media pembelajaran berbasis komputer pada materi pembiakan virus. Unnes Journal of Biology Education. 1 (1), 86-94.

Zaenal Arifin. (2020). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 1(1). Retrieved from https://alhikmah.stit-alhikmahwk.ac.id/index.php/awk/article/view/16

Zhang, M. F., Dawson, J. F., & Kline, R. B. (2021). Evaluating the use of covariance-based structural equation modelling with reflective measurement in organizational and management research: a review and recommendations for best practice. British Journal of Management, 32, 257– 272.

Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Impact of character education implementation: A goal-free evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.881

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Username
Password
Remember me