Email this article Generative AI Use, Self-Regulated Learning, and Creativity Among Indonesian Design Students
Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in design education, yet whether its use supports or substitutes for the self-directed creative process remains unclear, particularly outside the Chinese samples that dominate prior research. This study examined whether self-regulated learning (SRL) mediates the relationship between generative AI use and creativity among Indonesian design students. Data were collected through an online questionnaire from 120 Indonesian visual communication design students and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapped confidence intervals and four pre-specified sensitivity analyses. SRL was strongly and consistently associated with creativity (β = .674, f² = .962), and this association remained stable across all robustness checks. AI usage's relationships with SRL, with creativity directly, and with creativity indirectly through SRL were significant in the full sample but lost significance under two independent sensitivity analyses;. However, the sample was adequately powered to detect these effect sizes (post-hoc power ≥ .91); treat the point estimates as preliminary and confirm them in a larger, independent sample before treating them as established. A supplementary analysis found that frequency of AI use, unlike a richer measure of how AI was used, was unrelated to SRL or creativity. SRL is a robust correlate of creativity in AI-assisted design education, while AI use's own contribution requires replication; design pedagogy may be better served by cultivating self-regulation directly than by monitoring AI usage frequency alone.
Keywords: generative AI, self-regulated learning, creativity, design education, PLS-SEM.
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Alghamdi, A. A. (2025). University students’ perceptions of generative AI for critical thinking and creativity: The influence of self-efficacy and disciplinary differences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15.
Amusa, L. B., & Hossana, T. (2024). An empirical comparison of some missing data treatments in PLS-SEM. Plos one, 19(1), e0297037.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Chauliac, M., Willems, J., Gijbels, D., & Donche, V. (2023). The prevalence of careless response behaviour and its consequences on data quality in self-report questionnaires on student learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1197324
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Gu, W. (2026). Does generative AI dependence foster creativity? Evidence from sports undergraduates. PLoS One, 21(2), Article e0341277.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Helmiatin, Hidayat, A., & Kahar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: A study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2380175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Higher Education Policy Institute. (2026). Student generative AI survey 2026 (HEPI Report 199). https://www.hepi.ac.uk/reports/student-generative-ai-survey-2026/
Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). The influence of generative artificial intelligence on creative cognition of design students: A chain mediation model of self-efficacy and anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1455015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015
Jabeen, F., Awan, R. N., & Anwar, M. N. (2025). Mediating role of self-directed learning in the relationship between digital skills and creative mindset among university students. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 4(8), 131–144.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Lin, H., & Xie, L. (2026). Stimulating or constraining creativity? Traditional vs. generative AI on divergent thinking in product design. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1839565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1839565
Liu, Y., Chin, W. W., Cheah, J.-H., Hair, J. F., & Lyu, C. (2025). Tackling missing data in PLS-SEM: Strategies and insights for business research. Journal of Business Research, 201, Article 115739.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rahiem, M. D. H. (2026). Generative AI in higher education in Indonesia: Patterns of use and learning impact. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, Article 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102672
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Personnel Press.
Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2023). Dealing with careless responding in survey data: Prevention, identification, and recommended best practices. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 577–596.
Wiradarmo, A. A. (2026). Designing with Generative AI: Nurturing or Numbing Student Creativity?. Meraki: Journal of Creative Industries, 3(02), 57–68.
Xia, Q., Liu, Q., Tlili, A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). A systematic literature review on designing self-regulated learning using generative artificial intelligence and its future research directions. Computers & Education, 240, Article 105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465
Xu, J. (2026). How generative AI enhances self-regulated learning in EFL learners: a chain mediation model of “intention to use” and “learning engagement”. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1808183.
Xu, J., Luo, Y., & Wu, Y. (2026). AI support in self-regulated learning: A decade of technological evolution and meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70058
Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1842-1863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599
Zhou, Z., Guo, H., Ma, F., Yang, C., & Gao, Y. (2025). The chain mediating role of critical thinking and AI self-efficacy in GenAI usage competence and engineering students' creativity. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 35945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21132-0
Zhuang, Z., & Li, X. (2025). The influence of collaborative music creation supported by generative artificial intelligence on students’ creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1709513.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2020). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats