Teaching English for Specific Purposes through Content-Based Instruction in Food Security Terminology: Effects on Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing



Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Nurhaedah Gailea, Syafrizal Syafrizal, John Pahamzah, Andri Kurniawan

This study examined the effects of content-based instruction (CBI) using food-security terminology and of learner creativity on university EFL writing achievement. A quasi-experimental 2 × 2 factorial design involved 80 students selected by cluster random sampling (20 per cell). One class received CBI and the other problem-based learning (PBL); creativity was measured with a 30-item questionnaire and dichotomized at the class median. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, assumption tests, two-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD comparisons. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of teaching method, F(1, 76) = 5.82, p = .018, partial η² = .071; a significant main effect of creativity, F(1, 76) = 4.88, p = .030, partial η² = .060; and a large, significant interaction, F(1, 76) = 37.80, p < .001, partial η² = .332. CBI produced a higher overall mean than PBL (70.95 vs. 67.40), and highly creative students outperformed less creative students (70.80 vs. 67.55). Still, the interaction was crossover: Tukey comparisons showed that CBI–high creativity (M = 77.10) exceeded every other cell, whereas low-creativity learners scored higher under PBL (M = 70.30) than under CBI (M = 64.80). Authentic food-security content can strengthen ESP writing, but differentiated scaffolding is required because the relative effectiveness of CBI and PBL is conditional on learner creativity.

 

Keywords: content-based instruction, English for specific purposes, food security, EFL writing, learner creativity.

Ahmad, S., & Tuomainen, S. (2026). Enhancing ESP learning with content-based instruction and 21st-century skills. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 16, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjellc.16.2026.01

Al-Busaidi, S. (2021). Project-based learning as a tool for student-teachers’ professional development: A study in an Omani EFL teacher education program. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.7

Al-Dhamit, Y., & Al-Subh, S. (2019). The impact of brainstorming strategy on developing creative writing skills among EFL learners. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 8(1), 1–11.

Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p73

Ammari, M. (2025). Advancing ESP instruction through DDL: A structured training framework. Glottodidactica, 52(1), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2025.52.1.7

Anthony, L. (2018). A critical look at software tools in corpus linguistics. Linguistic Research, 35(Special Issue), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35..201804.007

Apsari, Y. (2018). The use of content-based instruction (CBI) to improve students’ reading comprehension. ELTIN Journal, 6(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.22219/eltin.v6i1.5439

Arshad, S., Irshad, S., & Batool, H. (2026). Balancing agency and automation to overcome digital divide in ESP writing instruction. Journal of International Students, 16(12), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.32674/z8n0h321

Barkaoui, K. (2024). Exploring the effects of task difficulty and learner variables on performance on picture description writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 60, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100827

Basturkmen, H. (2014). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cen, Y. (2021). Effects of content-based instruction on English writing skills of EFL learners: A meta-analysis. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211038459

Chekol, A., Shiferie, K., & Teshome, S. (2023). Effects of using adjunct model of content-based instruction on students’ technical report writing performance. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2214427

Chien, C. W. (2026). Evidence-based writing instruction and its impact on Taiwanese novice researchers’ flow and writing skills. Journal of Second Language Writing, 72, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101306

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2016). Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language in CLIL. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 89–106). Multilingual Matters.

Derwing, T. M. (2018). Comprehensibility. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). Wiley.

Eche, D., & Hernández-Herrera, M. (2018). Studying food security among students: A comparative case study between public and private universities in Quito-Ecuador. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 35(6), 1372–1378. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.1972

FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, & WHO. (2023). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2023. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3017en

Fitriani, H., & Gani, S. A. (2021). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking and writing skills in an EFL context. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18318

Flowerdew, L. (2015). Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 325–346). Wiley-Blackwell.

Godfray, H. C. J., & Garnett, T. (2014). Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1639), 20120273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273

González-Geraldo, J. L., & González-Herrero, M. E. (2017). The effect of problem-based learning on the development of writing skills in English as a foreign language. Porta Linguarum, 28, 87–102.

Harizaj, M., & Çeliku, T. (2020). The impact of creative writing activities on EFL learners’ writing skills. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i1.3369

Henry, C. J. (2020). The role of nutrition in the achievement of the UN’s sustainable development goals. Nutrition Bulletin, 45(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12415

Hsia, T. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A creative-thinking approach to improving the project-based learning of elementary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12148

Hung, W. (2015). Problem-based learning: A learning environment for enhancing learning transfer. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2015(145), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20122

Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing: A personal account. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.04.009

Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Academic.

Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Newbury House.

Jaelani, S. R. (2017). Treating of content-based instruction to teach writing viewed from EFL learners’ creativity. English Language Teaching, 10(11), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p156

Juknevičienė, R., & Grabowski, Ł. (2018). Comparing formulaicity of learner writing through phrase-frames: A corpus-driven study of Lithuanian and Polish EFL student writing. Research in Language, 16(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0016

Jumariati, J., & Sulistyo, G. (2017). Problem-based writing instruction: Its effect on students’ skills in argumentative writing. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.6

Kang, M., Peng, F., Chen, Y., & Jin, T. (2026). Flipping the classroom in ESP genre-based academic writing instruction: An exploratory study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70169

Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative learning in education. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 589–608). Cambridge University Press.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Lo, Y. Y., & Jeong, D. W. (2019). Effects of content and language integrated learning on students’ English proficiency and content knowledge: A meta-analysis. System, 86, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102133

Mbow, C., Rosenzweig, C., Barioni, L. G., Benton, T. G., Herrero, M., Krishnapillai, M., & Wollenberg, E. (2019). Food security. In Climate change and land: An IPCC special report (pp. 437–550). IPCC.

McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2019). Comparing the effect of collaborative and individual prewriting on EFL learners’ writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.003

Memari Hanjani, A. (2024). Comparing trained EFL peer reviewers’ feedback: From claim to reality. Assessing Writing, 60, 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100836

Mtambo, B., & Tshuma, L. (2023). Intermediate phase learner performance in English: A quantitative analysis. Reading & Writing, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v14i1.430

Mujtaba, S. M., Sippel, L., Barrot, J., & Parkash, R. (2025). The effects of model-based feedback on students’ writing performance: The role of writing anxiety and learner beliefs. Language Awareness, 35(1), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2025.2467113

Mujtaba, S. M., Zhang, T., & Sletova, N. (2026). Task complexity, collaborative writing, and learner engagement: Examining second language learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 68, 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2026.101042

Muraraneza, C., Mtshali, N. G., & Mukamana, D. (2018). Issues and challenges of curriculum reform to competency-based curricula in Africa: A meta-synthesis. Nursing & Health Sciences, 19(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12316

Müller, C., & Lotze-Campen, H. (2012). Integrating the complexity of global change pressures on land and water. Global Food Security, 1(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.001

Nurjannah, S., Erniati, E., & Jusmaniar, N. (2020). The use of content-based instruction in English language teaching. DIKDAS MATAPPA, 3(2), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v3i2.809

Patria, B., & Laili, L. (2021). Writing group program reduces academic procrastination: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00665-9

Ramazani, M. (2024). Written corrective feedback in English for specific purposes nursing students’ writing courses: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Medical Education Development, 17(53), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.61186/edcj.17.53.82

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 238–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013

Sariani, S., Yaningsih, Y., & Rozi, F. (2022). Implementing content-based instruction (CBI) on EFL students’ writing through technology-enhanced language teaching. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.429

Shadiev, R., Liu, T., Reynolds, B. L., & Hwang, W. Y. (2025). Exploring the effects of (un)familiar environments on MALL task writing performance, EFL writing proficiency, and learner perceptions. ReCALL, 38(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344025100402

Shi, S., & Wang, Y. (2026). The effects of AI-powered genre-based writing instruction on low-proficiency EFL writers’ ideal L2 writing self, writing enjoyment and L2 writing performance: A quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. European Journal of Education, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70791

Stoller, F. L. (2015). Content-based instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 165–180). National Geographic Learning.

Suzuki, N. (2021). Effects of content-based instruction (CBI) on EFL secondary school learners’ writing. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 10(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.20006.suz

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Szabó-Szettele, K., & Kárpáti, A. (2023). Quasi-experimental study on fostering creativity through creative writing in German as a Foreign Language (GFL) in COVID-19. F1000Research, 12, 1307. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133982.1

Tang, C., & Liu, Y. T. (2018). Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation. Assessing Writing, 35, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002

Tzoannopoulou, M. (2015). Rethinking ESP: Integrating content and language in the university classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.045

Wang, L. (2026). Learner engagement and writing performance in assessment as learning L2 writing. Languages, 11(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11040062

Wang, L. J. (2026). Question-only AI Socratic dialogue as dialogic feedback in L2 argumentative writing: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 73, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101331

Wati, D. R. (2018). Improving the students’ descriptive text writing ability through the implementation of clustering technique at the tenth grade of MAN 1 Metro. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 11(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.24042/jet.v11i1.2293

Webb, P., Stordalen, G. A., Singh, S., Wijesinha-Bettoni, R., Gahukar, R. T., & Ghosh-Jerath, S. (2018). Hunger and malnutrition in the 21st century. BMJ, 361, k2238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2238

Westerveld, J. J. L., van den Homberg, M. J. C., Nobre, G. G., van den Berg, D. L. J., Teklesadik, A. D., & Stuit, S. M. (2021). Forecasting transitions in the state of food security with machine learning using transferable features. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147366

Wu, Q., & Albert, Á. (2024). Learner agency and potential for creativity in writing task design and Chinese EFL students’ flow experiences in writing: A contextual perspective. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241258661

Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004

Zhao, X., & Wang, D. (2026). The impact of ChatGPT’s feedback on L2 Chinese learners’ writing outcome, confidence, and emotions: A mixed-method quasi-experimental study. Assessing Writing, 68, 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2026.101027

Teaching English for Specific Purposes through Content-Based Instruction in Food Security Terminology: Effects on Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats