Email this article Level Up Numeracy: Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Digital Gamification to Revitalize High School Students' Multiplication Skills
This research describes the implementation and evaluates the effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based digital gamification strategy, the 'Level Up Numeracy' program, in revitalizing high school students’ multiplication skills. The study specifically aimed to measure improvements in computational efficiency and explore students' motivational and emotional responses to the intervention. The study used a pre-experimental, one-group pretest-posttest design with a cohort of 47 tenth-grade students at SMAN 4 Cibinong. The intervention was a multi-level educational game developed with Canva AI, featuring leaderboards, badges, and instant feedback. Data were collected through automated time tracking of student performance across two sessions (pretest and posttest) and a qualitative reflective questionnaire validated using Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR = 1.00). Quantitative data were analyzed using disaggregated paired-samples t-tests and two-way cross-tabulation, while qualitative feedback was examined through thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's framework. The intervention yielded a statistically significant improvement in students' computational speed. The average task completion time decreased from 812.62 seconds (SD = 295.51) in the pretest to 512.55 seconds (SD = 226.43) in the posttest, t(46) = 10.62, p < .001. This represents a 36.92 % increase in cognitive efficiency. Qualitatively, 87.2% of students reported highly positive emotional shifts, describing the gamified experience as motivating, challenging, and engaging, which fostered a competitive yet supportive learning environment. AI-based digital gamification proves to be a highly effective, scalable, and cost-efficient strategy for enhancing fundamental numeracy skills and learning engagement among high school students. Generative AI empowers educators to create customized, interactive learning tools, offering a promising avenue for addressing foundational learning gaps in various educational contexts.
Keywords: numeracy, digital gamification, artificial intelligence, mathematics learning, Canva AI.
Ahmad, F. B. (2024). AI-driven educational gamification in mathematics: Enhancing student engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoc.27.2.45
Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059
Biyatmoko, P., & Subekti, F. E. (2025). Innovative learning models in high school mathematics: Addressing procedural gaps. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1817a
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037. 2181040
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, and grades. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2014.08.019
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic review. Mathematics, 9(17), 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172119
Karnilah, N., Suhendra, S., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Digital gamification in secondary school mathematics: Impact on procedural fluency and off-task behavior. Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2. p201-216
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah RI. (2025). Laporan Capaian Kemampuan Akademik dan Numerasi Siswa Menengah. Kemendikdasmen.
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alhajri, S., & Thomas, J. (2023). Interacting with educational AI chatbots: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Kurniawan, R., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Enhancing mathematical critical thinking skills through game-based learning environments. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10231
Maanu, V., Mensah, F. S., & Osei, E. (2025). AI-enhanced adaptive systems in mathematics education: Affective and cognitive implications. Computers & Education, 192, 104689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104689
Meylani, R. (2025). Strategic gamification in upper secondary mathematics classrooms: Evaluating procedural automaticity gains. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2301982
Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human-AI learning technologies: The role of generative tools in empowering teacher instructional design. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
Nur’Aida, M., Setiawan, W., & Agustin, R. (2024). Digital game-based intervention for remedial mathematics in senior high schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2712(1), 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2712/1/012045
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Park, J. (2025). Generative AI as a co-designer for teachers: Rapid development of interactive learning materials. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10350-x
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10019
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tronsky, L. N. (2005). Strategy use, speed, and accuracy in multiplication series: Cognitive load effects. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193086
Vhalery, R., Setyadi, A., & Kurniawan, A. (2024). Digital gamification for high school mathematics: Managing anxiety and boosting procedural speed. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2104
Yeo, G., & Lansford, J. E. (2025). Effects of artificial intelligence on educational functioning: A review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10085-5
Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev. 2020.100326
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats