Email this article Constructing an Adaptive Learning Framework Integrating STEAM–Gamification for Numeracy and Computational Thinking in Remote Indonesian Elementary Schools
This study aimed to construct and validate the design of an adaptive learning framework that integrates STEAM–gamification principles with Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)–Item Response Theory (IRT) to simultaneously develop numeracy literacy and computational thinking among elementary school students in Indonesia’s 3T (remote, frontier, underdeveloped) regions. A mixed-methods sequential exploratory design integrated with Design-Based Research (DBR) was applied over eight months in Pinrang Regency, South Sulawesi, across 10 schools in the qualitative phase and 20 schools in the quantitative phase. Qualitative data were drawn from interviews and focus group discussions with 30 teachers, 10 principals, 30 students, and 20 stakeholders, alongside 30 classroom observations; quantitative data were collected from 300 Grade IV–V students and 60 teachers using structured surveys, IRT-calibrated diagnostic tests (3PL; α = .83), and an ICT infrastructure audit. The framework synthesized qualitative and quantitative findings into four integrated layers: Pedagogical (STEAM), Motivational (gamification), Adaptive (ZPD–IRT), and Assessment (computational thinking + numeracy). Expert design validation employed LORI, Aiken’s V, and Fleiss’ Kappa with eight domain specialists. The needs analysis showed that 85% of teachers relied exclusively on conventional instruction, 78% identified a strong need for interactive learning media, and only 30% of schools had adequate ICT infrastructure. The composite numeracy mean was 50.1/100 and the computational thinking mean was 48.3/100, with geometry the weakest numeracy domain (34.7). Economic feasibility yielded a benefit-cost ratio of 1.42, a positive NPV, and an internal rate of return of 18.3%. Expert design validation yielded a LORI mean of 4.38/5, a Fleiss’ Kappa of 0.74, and an Aiken’s V of 0.79, all exceeding acceptability thresholds. The four-layer adaptive framework, among the first to integrate STEAM, gamification, ZPD–IRT adaptive learning, and computational thinking as a coherent system for Indonesia’s 3T elementary schools, provides a replicable theoretical model and an expert-validated design basis for subsequent product development and efficacy trials
Keywords: adaptive learning framework, STEAM–gamification, numeracy literacy, computational thinking, 3T elementary schools.
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Angrist, N., Aurino, E., Patrinos, H. A., Psacharopoulos, G., Vegas, E., Nordjo, R. E., & Wong, B. (2023). Improving learning in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 14, 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2023.26
Boussakuk, M., Bouchboua, A., Ghazi, M. E., Bekkali, M. E., & Fattah, M. (2021). Design of a computerized adaptive testing module for our dynamic adaptive hypermedia system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(18), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i18.23841
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Budiyono, B., Wiryanto, W., Suprayitno, S., & Primaniarta, M. G. (2023). Persepsi mahasiswa pendidikan dasar terhadap gamifikasi dalam pendidikan STEAM [Elementary education students' perceptions of gamification in STEAM education]. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3591–3605. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4909
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (Version 2.2). http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Chen, C., Jamiat, N., & Mao, Y. (2023). The study on the effects of gamified interactive ebooks on students’ learning achievements and motivation in a Chinese character learning flipped classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1236297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236297
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dagiene, V., & Futschek, G. (2008). Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: Criteria for good tasks. In R. T. Mittermeir & M. M. Syslo (Eds.), Informatics in schools: Supporting computational thinking (pp. 19–30). Springer.
Dahlia, D., Oci, N., Pujiastuti, H., & Mutaqin, A. (2024). Peran soft skill dan hard skill dalam kemampuan numerasi siswa: Systematic literature review [The role of soft skills and hard skills in students' numeracy abilities: Systematic literature review]. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 4185–4198. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.7471
David, L., & Weinstein, N. (2023). A gamified experiential learning intervention for engaging students through satisfying needs. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231174614
Heryani, Y., Kartono, K., Wijayanti, K., & Dewi, N. R. (2023). Analysis of students’ mathematical literacy ability in solving HOTS problems in minimum competency assessment. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(16). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i16.6470
Jusniani, N., Nursofa, W., & Rahmi, D. F. (2023). Pengaruh kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik dan motivasi belajar terhadap numerasi siswa kelas 4 SD [The influence of mathematical problem-solving abilities and learning motivation on the numeracy of grade 4 elementary school students]. Journal of Contemporary Issue in Elementary Education, 1(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.33830/jciee.v1i2.6469
Kabilan, M. K., Annamalai, N., & Chuah, K. M. (2023). Practices, purposes and challenges in integrating gamification using technology: A mixed-methods study on university academics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14249–14279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11723-7
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021). Gamification in science education: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maulidiansy, H., Novaliyosi, & Hendrayana, A. (2023). E-Motivector (e-modul interaktif berbantuan video creator) yang mendukung pembelajaran STEAM [E-Motivector (an interactive e-module assisted by a video creator) that supports STEAM learning]. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v6i2.2742
Masraria, Pajarianto, H., Masnur, & Ching Yang, C. (2026). The mediating role of student feedback in math playground game learning: Effects on perceived ease, motivation, and learning outcomes. Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i1.19625
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nesbit, J., Belfer, K., & Leacock, T. (2009). Learning object review instrument (LORI) user manual (Version 2.0). E-Learning Research and Assessment Network.
Nurhasnah, N., Sepriyanti, N., & Kustati, M. (2024). Learning theories according to constructivism theory. Journal International Inspire Education Technology, 3(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.55849/jiiet.v3i1.577
Nurhayati, N., Asrin, A., & Dewi, N. K. (2022). Analisis kemampuan numerasi siswa kelas tinggi dalam penyelesaian soal pada materi geometri di SDN 1 Teniga [Analysis of the numeracy abilities of high-grade students in solving problems on geometry material at SDN 1 Teniga]. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(2b), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i2b.678
Puspitasari, E., Solfiah, Y., & Zulkifli, N. (2022). Pengembangan scanbook untuk pembelajaran berbasis STEAM di lembaga PAUD [Development of scanbooks for STEAM-based learning in PAUD institutions]. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 6173–6188. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.2025
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2022). Analisis capaian siswa Indonesia pada PISA dan urgensi kurikulum berorientasi literasi dan numerasi [Analysis of Indonesian students' achievements in PISA and the urgency of a literacy and numeracy-oriented curriculum]. EDUPEDIKA: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.60004/edupedika.v1i1.1
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Salsabila, N. H., Baidowi, B., Azmi, S., & Lu’luilmaknun, U. (2022). Interactive multimedia oriented to the mathematical numeracy skills of junior high school students. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v6i2.15118
Saleha, S., Nadar, N., & Masnur, M. (2026). Developing a TPACK-based science module through project-based learning to enhance elementary students’ 4Cs skills. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 14(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v14i1.89864
Silvia, R., & Asdarina, O. (2024). Kemampuan numerasi siswa pada materi operasi pecahan dengan implementasi model problem based learning (PBL) [Students' numeracy skills on fraction operations material with the implementation of the problem based learning (PBL) model]. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v5i1.5516
Susandi, A. D., Kandaga, T., Basri, H., & Rindastri, V. (2025). Mapping elementary students’ numeracy literacy skills: A comprehensive analysis based on six indicators. Smart Society Community Service and Empowerment Journal, 5(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.58524/martsociety.v5i2.852
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Waluyo, R., Kusuma, L. L., & Zamora, H. P. (2024). Pemanfaatan teknologi untuk meningkatkan numerasi peserta didik SMP N 1 Kertanegara [Utilization of technology to improve numeracy of students at SMP N 1 Kertanegara]. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Abdira), 4(3), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.31004/abdira.v4i3.491
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zhang, Z., & Huang, X. (2024). Exploring the impact of the adaptive gamified assessment on learners in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 21869–21894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12708-w
Zourmpakis, A.-I., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2023). Adaptive gamification in science education: An analysis of the impact of implementation and adapted game elements on students’ motivation. Computers, 12(7), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12070143
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats