Email this article Metacognitive Awareness in EFL Reading Comprehension for Senior High School Students: Predictive Insights
Metacognitive awareness is widely recognized as an important factor influencing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading comprehension. However, evidence regarding the contributions of its components remains inconclusive, particularly in the Indonesian context. This study examined the relationship between metacognitive awareness and EFL reading comprehension among Indonesian high school students and investigated gender differences in metacognitive awareness. A total of 72 students (42 males and 30 females) participated in the study. Data were collected using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and a reading comprehension test. The Rasch model implemented in the Quest program was used to analyze item difficulty, and One-Way MANOVA was used to examine gender differences. To investigate the structural relationships between metacognitive awareness dimensions and reading comprehension, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed. PLS-SEM was selected because it is suitable for exploratory models and can accommodate relatively small samples when model complexity is limited; however, the sample size remains a limitation of the study. The Rasch analysis revealed that items requiring inference of unstated information were the most difficult, whereas vocabulary inference based on contextual clues was the easiest. MANOVA results indicated that female students demonstrated higher levels of metacognitive awareness than male students. The PLS-SEM analysis showed that metacognitive regulation was not significantly associated with reading comprehension. In contrast, metacognitive knowledge exhibited a stronger positive relationship with reading comprehension, suggesting that students’ awareness of their cognitive processes contributes more substantially to reading performance than their regulatory strategies. Although metacognitive regulation did not significantly predict reading performance, metacognitive knowledge emerged as a more meaningful contributor. These results suggest that EFL instruction should place greater emphasis on fostering students’ metacognitive knowledge to enhance reading comprehension. Future research should employ larger and more diverse samples to improve the generalizability of the findings.
Keywords: EFL learners, gender differences, metacognitive awareness, metacognitive knowledge, reading comprehension.
Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), e04192.
Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2018). EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 297–308.
Alkhateeb, H. M., Abushihab, E. F., Alkhateeb, R. H., & Alkhateeb, B. H. (2021). Reading Strategies Used by Undergraduate University General Education Courses for Students in US And Qatar. Reading Psychology, 42(6), 663–679.
Anggia, H., & Habók, A. (2023). Textual complexity adjustments to the English reading comprehension test for undergraduate EFL students. Heliyon.
Baba Öztürk, M., & Aydogmus, M. (2021). Relational assessment of metacognitive reading strategies and reading motivation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 357–375.
Chen, L. W. C. (2015). Taiwanese EFL learners’ perceived use of online reading strategies. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(2), 68–80.
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437.
Fisher, D. (2021). The relationships between metacognition and reading strategies: The case of English-majored students at a private university in Vietnam. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 69–81.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Ismail, N. E., Jimam, N. S., Dapar, M. L. P., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Validation and reliability of healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice instrument for uncomplicated malaria by Rasch measurement model. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10, 1–8.
Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 1–19.
Khreisat, M. N. (2022). Investigating metacognitive reading strategy awareness of Saudi tertiary students: Comparisons of gender, reading ability and year level. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(2), 122–139.
Köse, N., & Güneş, F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ use of metacognitive strategies while reading and the relationship between strategy use and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 99.
Kwong, K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32.
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862.
Polat, M., Turhan, N. S., & Toraman, Ç. (2022). Comparison of classical test theory vs. multi-facet Rasch theory. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 12(2), 213–225.
Puth, M. T., Neuhäuser, M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2014). Effective use of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Animal Behaviour, 93, 183–189.
Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Benoit, D. F. (2016). Promoting metacognitive regulation through collaborative problem solving on the web: When scripting does not work. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 325–342.
Rogers, B. (2007). The complete guide to the TOEFL test.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449.
Stephanou, G., & Mpiontini, M.-H. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in self-regulatory learning style. Psychology, 8(12), 1941–1975.
Taki, S., & Soleimani, G. H. (2012). Online reading strategy use and gender differences: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 173–184.
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1).
Zhu, T., Zhang, J. T., & Cheng, M. Y. (2022). One-way MANOVA for functional data via Lawley–Hotelling trace test. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 192, 105095.
Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., & Maasum, T. N. R. B. T. M. (2010). Collaborative strategic reading with university EFL learners. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(1), 67–94.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats