The ‘Utilitarian-Anxiety Paradox’: A TAM-based Analysis of Junior High School English Teachers’ Artificial Intelligence Acceptance



Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Faisal Faisal, Maulida Qurrota A'yunina, Condro Nur Alim, Jiraporn Yiamkhamnuan

Despite the widespread perception that artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform English teaching, the psychological dimension of teachers’ acceptance, particularly the coexistence of high perceived usefulness and persistent anxiety, remains under-theorized in the Indonesian junior-secondary context. Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study aimed to (1) determine the level of AI acceptance among junior high school English teachers in Indonesia and (2) investigate the factors shaping it, especially the proposed ‘utilitarian-anxiety paradox.’ In a quantitative cross-sectional survey, 42 teachers completed a Likert-scale instrument derived from Wang et al. (2021), measuring six TAM constructs: perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), self-efficacy (SE), anxiety (AN), attitude toward use (ATU), and behavioral intention (BI). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and a moderation analysis. Overall acceptance was high (M = 3.96), with PU (M = 4.32) and BI (M = 4.08) rated most positively. At the same time, anxiety remained moderate (M = 3.54), and analysis showed that anxiety did not decrease with teacher perception of AI as more useful or easier to use. A multiple linear regression model explained 70.6% of the variance in behavioral intention (R² = .706, p < .001); emotional comfort (reverse-scored anxiety) was the strongest predictor (β = .427), followed by PU (β = .366) and SE (β = .334). In contrast, PEU was not significant (β = -.105). Although anxiety did not significantly moderate the usefulness–intention relationship overall (p = .13), a simple-slopes analysis indicated that perceived usefulness mattered most when teacher anxiety was high. These findings provide evidence for a ‘utilitarian-anxiety paradox,’ suggesting that positive usability perceptions do not fully account for teachers’ emotional readiness to adopt AI, and call for context-sensitive professional development to build digital resilience in Indonesian secondary settings.

 

Keywords: artificial intelligence acceptance, english teachers, junior high schools.

Ahmed, S., & Roche, T. (2022). Digital literacy and academic staff in an English medium instruction university: A case study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.301197

Akoglu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001

Al-Anezi, Y. H., & Alajmi, S. M. (2021). Factors that influence English teachers' acceptance and use of e-learning technologies. International Education Studies, 14(9), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n9p15

Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132

Alejandro, I. M. V., Sánchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., & Fernández, C. B. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education. STEM Education, 4(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024024

Alifah, N., & Hidayat, A. R. (2025). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based learning analytics tool in supporting personalized learning in higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i1.pp74-84

Annese, S., Amenduni, F., Candido, V., McLay, K. F., & Ligorio, M. B. (2022). Tutor’s role in WhatsApp learning groups: A quali-quantitative methodological approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 799456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.799456

Annisa, A., Suhatmady, B., & Rusmawaty, D. (2025). Investigating EFL teachers' technology adoption level of ICT Integration by using the extended technology acceptance model: A study of MGMP Bahasa Inggris in Kutai Kartanegara. Borneo Educational Journal (Borju), 7(2), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v7i2.2207

Apreliani, D., Muamaroh, & Yeny, P. (2025). Examining technology self-efficacy in Indonesian EFL classrooms: Insights from secondary school English teachers. Voices of English Language Education Society, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.27861

Arslan, A. (2020). Reliability and validity of instruments measuring English teachers' TPACK. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.679876

Aurangzeb, W., Kashan, S., & Rehman, Z. U. (2024). Investigating technology perceptions among secondary school teachers: A systematic literature review on perceived usefulness and ease of use. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.746

Bautista, A., Estrada, C., Jaravata, A. M., Mangaser, L. M., Narag, F., Soquila, R., & Asuncion, R. J. (2024). Preservice teachers' readiness towards integrating AI-based tools in education: A TPACK approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3

Bernstein, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-8 education: Understanding teachers’ perceptions and district leader readiness while preparing for AI adoption Concordia University Chicago]. Chicago.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2016). Research in education. Pearson Education India.

Brandhofer, G., & Tengler, K. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities, concerns, and need for action. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.005

Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Rivas-Manzano, M. d. R. d. (2024). Acceptance of educational artificial intelligence by teachers and its relationship with some variables and pedagogical beliefs. Education Sciences, 14(7), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070740

Cantos, K. F. S., Coello, M. B. B., & Pintado, J. A. C. (2023). Using online tools in teaching English as a foreign language. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(5), 5783–5794.

Cao, L. (2025). A study on the readiness of English teachers in Macao universities in the era of AI. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(4), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-12-2024-0314

Chang, T.-S., Li, Y., Huang, H.-W., & Whitfield, B. (2021). Exploring EFL students' writing performance and their acceptance of AI-based automated writing feedback. Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies,

Chen, D., Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2024). What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model. Acta Psychologica, 249, 104442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442

Cho, K. A., & Seo, Y. H. (2024). Dual mediating effects of anxiety to use and acceptance attitude of artificial intelligence technology on the relationship between nursing students’ perception of and intention to use them: a descriptive study. BMC nursing, 23(1), 212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01887-z

Çoban, N., Kar, D., & Berk, Ş. N. (2025). Artificial intelligence anxiety levels of faculty of health sciences students and affecting factors. Archives of Health Science and Research, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2025.24147

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Copeland, C. (2024). Using the technology acceptance model to understand attitudes about smartphone translators for EFL writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 18(1), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2024.18.1.165

Cresswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dehghani, H., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Exploring Iranian English as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT in English language teaching: Extending the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12660-9

Dewi, L. P. D. K., Purnamika Utami, I., & Santosa, M. H. (2024). The importance of digital literacy skills in the context of learning English for Specific Purposes: A systematic review. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(8).

Ebadi, S., Gholami, M., & Vakili, S. (2023). Investigating the effects of using Grammarly in EFL writing: The case of articles. Computers in the Schools, 40(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2150067

Edelsbrunner, P. A., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2025). The Cronbach’s alpha of domain-specific knowledge tests before and after learning: A meta-analysis of published studies. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09982-y

Efimova, G., Sorokin, A., & Gribovskiy, M. (2021). Ideal teacher of higher school: Personal qualities and socio-professional competencies. The Education and Science Journal, 23(1), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-202-230

Faisal, F., Anjarani, S., & Hendra, H. (2024). Investigating teachers' anxiety towards artificial intelligence. iTELL International Conference 2024, UKSW, Salatiga, Indonesia.

Faisal, F., & Carabella, P. A. (2023). Utilizing Grammarly in an academic writing process: Higher-education students’ perceived views. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006

Faisal, F., Harningsih, N. O., & Razali, R. (2026). From awareness to adoption: English teachers’ artificial intelligence acceptance in junior high schools. English Learning Innovation (englie), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v7i1.42559

Farooq, M., Buzdar, H. Q., Yen, Y. Y., & Bakhsh, A. (2024). Integrating AI in sustainable writing: An empirical investigation of the technology acceptance model in Asian social sciences. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0321

Firdaus, R., Habibi, A., Hendra, R., Fauzee, M. S. O., Oktaria, S. D., Sofwan, M., & Alqahtani, T. M. (2025). Factors affecting Indonesian pre-service EFL teachers’ AI acceptance and use. Texto Livre, 18, e57135. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2025.57135

Fitria, T. N. (2021). The use of technology based on artificial intelligence in English teaching and learning. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.9299

Gümüş, M. M., & Kukul, V. (2023). Developing a digital competence scale for teachers: Validity and reliability study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2747–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8 ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hang, N. T. (2026). Vietnamese EFL Teachers' readiness and challenges in integrating AI-generated feedback. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 4(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.3026-7196.315

Hartono, W. J., Nurfitri, N., Ridwan, R., Kase, E. B., Lake, F., & Zebua, R. S. Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in English language teaching: Teachers-students perceptions and experiences. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1452-1461. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3101

Hastomo, T., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., & Zen, E. L. (2025). EFL teachers’self-efficacy in using AI tools: A comparative study in Indonesia. Advanced Education, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.335502

Helmiatin, Hidayat, A., & Kahar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: A study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2380175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175

Hoşgör, H. (2021). Application of Likert scales and the analysis of survey data in social sciences. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v10i2.8976

Huttayavilaiphan, R. (2024). Digital competence and anxiety in Thai university English education: Impacts on teachers and students. World Journal of English Language, 15(1), 225–225. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n1p225

Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in Mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584

Ibrahim, A., & Shiring, E. (2022). The relationship between educators' attitudes, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use of instructional and web-based technologies: Implications from technology acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.285

Insani, A. N. P., Aprilia, P. K., & Mistar, J. (2024). Challenges and opportunities: A qualitative study of EFL teachers' digital proficiency and its impact on interactive language assessment. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25095

Ismail, N., & Joshy, L. M. (2025). Exploring the role of perceived usefulness and AI anxiety in technology-driven self-directed learning: A paradox mindset perspective. Management and Labour Studies, 50(3), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X251357415

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.

Joseph, V., & Khan, N. (2020). Digital literacy tools to enhance English reading and writing skills: A detailed literature. Global Language Review, 3, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-III).03

Kartika, N. H., Darmawan, I. G. N., Susilo, S., & Setiawan, I. (2024). Perceptions of the technology acceptance model and the impact of mobile technology on learning in English as a foreign language classrooms: Insights from students and teachers. Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika dan Sains, 14(01), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.54209/infosains.v14i01

Kavitha, K., & Joshith, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence powered pedagogy: Unveiling higher educators acceptance with extended TAM. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(8), 1–34.

Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kohne, J., Elhai, J. D., & Montag, C. (2023). A practical guide to WhatsApp data in social science research. In C. Montag & H. Baumeister (Eds.), Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing: New Developments in Psychoinformatics (pp. 171–205). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98546-2_11

Li, B. (2021). Ready for online? Exploring EFL teachers’ ICT acceptance and ICT literacy during COVID-19 in Mainland China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211028934

Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education during the digital era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1–9.

Lindner, J. R. (2024). Interpreting Likert scale data: Best practices for agricultural education and beyond. Journal of Agricultural Education, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2024.01092

Liu, N. (2025). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence technology by university teachers: The mediating role of confidence and AI readiness. BMC psychology, 13(1), 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02620-4

Lytvynova, S., Vodopian, N., & Sysoeva, O. (2023). Artificial intelligence in secondary education: An innovative teacher’s tool to ensure individualised learning for students. International Conference on New Media Pedagogy,

Ma, J., Wang, P., Li, B., Wang, T., Pang, X. S., & Wang, D. (2025). Exploring user adoption of ChatGPT: A technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1431-1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2314358

Mariscal, L. L., Albarracín, M. R., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. L. (2023). Pedagogical competence towards technology-driven instruction on basic education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.18

Mavhandu-Mudzusi, A. H., Moyo, I., Mthombeni, A., Ndou, A., Mamabolo, L., Ngwenya, T., . . . Netshapapame, T. (2022). WhatsApp as a qualitative data collection method in descriptive phenomenological studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221111124. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221111124

Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J. H. (2025). Convenience sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(2)01

Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications.

Milutinović, V. (2022). Examining the influence of pre-service teachers’ digital native traits on their technology acceptance: A Serbian perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6483–6511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10887-y

MPSE. (2025a). Jumlah data satuan pendidikan (DIKDAS) per kabupaten di Banyumas. MPSE. Retrieved April 2025 from https://referensi.data.kemendikdasmen.go.id/pendidikan/dikdas/030200/2/jf/6/s1

MPSE. (2025b). Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang kurikulum pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah. Jakarta

Mukminin, A., Muhaimin, M., Diat Prasojo, L., Khaeruddin, K., Habibi, A., Marzulina, L., & Harto, K. (2022). Analyzing social media use in TEFL via the technology acceptance model in Indonesian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching English with Technology, 22(1), 3–22.

Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., & Roh, Y. (2022). Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework. Buildings, 12(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090

Noor, N. M. M., Anuar, N., Halim, M. A. A., Sharif, N. F. M., Tahreb, N. S., & Azhari, S. H. A. (2026). Exploring ELT instructors’ readiness for AI integration: A qualitative study of student perceptions in Malaysian higher education. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v9i3.5403

Nuralam, I. P., Yudiono, N., Fahmi, M. R. A., Yuliaji, E. S., & Hidayat, T. (2024). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and customer satisfaction as driving factors on repurchase intention: the perspective of the e-commerce market in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2413376. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2413376

Okmen, B., & Kilic, A. (2016). The language teaching methods scale: Reliability and validity studies. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.3.137

Özer-Altınkaya, Z., & Yetkin, R. (2025). Exploring pre-service English language teachers’ readiness for AI-integrated language instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 20(4), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2451299

Pangestu, B., & Dwiniasih, D. (2024). EFL teachers' technology acceptance: applying the technology acceptance model in secondary language learning in Indonesia. Cirebon International Conference on Education and Economics Proceeding,

Pardede, P. (2020). Secondary school EFL teachers’ perception of ICT use in learning and teaching: A case study in Greater Jakarta. Journal of English Teaching, 6(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.190

Pimentel, J. L. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert scaling for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal, 18(2), 109–112.

Pratama, R., Sulistiyo, U., Sadikin, A., & Wijaya, H. A. (2025). Understanding AI acceptance among Indonesian pre-service teachers: The mediating role of anxiety and self-efficacy in a UTAUT framework. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2025-0358

Rachmawati, D. L., Maruf, N., & Fadhilawati, D. (2025). Emotional AI in EFL classrooms: Redefining human–machine affect in ELT research at Islamic university. Register Journal, 18(2), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v18i2.341-368

Ramadhani, F. A., Ariani, M., & Fitriyah, S. M. (2023). EFL teachers’ readiness in using technology to teach English in a public junior high school. EFL Education Journal, 10(3), 122–137.

Rentler, B. R., & Apple, D. (2020). Understanding the acceptance of e-learning in a Japanese university English program using the technology acceptance model. APU Journal of Language Research, 5, 22–37.

Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M. (2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence. Technology in Society, 77, 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102537

Şen, N., & Yildiz, D. H. (2022). Examining the relationships between English teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies with professional competencies and technology integrating self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 5953-5988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10867-8

Shahid, M. K., Zia, T., Bangfan, L., Iqbal, Z., & Ahmad, F. (2024). Exploring the relationship of psychological factors and adoption readiness in determining university teachers’ attitude on AI-based assessment systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100967

Singer, B., Walsh, C. M., Gondwe, L., Reynolds, K., Lawrence, E., & Kasiya, A. (2023). WhatsApp as a medium to collect qualitative data among adolescents: Lessons learned and considerations for future use. Gates Open Research, 4(130), 130. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13169.2

Siroj, R. A., Afgani, W., Fatimah, F., Septaria, D., & Salsabila, G. Z. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif pendekatan ilmiah untuk analisis data. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(3), 11279–11289.

Soleimani, E., Ismail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The acceptance of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) among post graduate ESL students in UKM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457–462. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.062

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Alfabeta.

Suharno, S., Musthafa, B., & Purnawarman, P. (2025). Exploring perceptions and experiences: Integrating AI in English language teaching from the perspectives of learners and educators. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(1), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v15i1.pp499-515

Sukardi, M. (2021). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Kompetensi dan praktiknya. Bumi Aksara.

Sulistiyo, U., Reli, H., Faruq, U. M., & Mujiyono, W. (2022). Determinants of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards ICT use for English language learning. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2 (30)), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12467

Sun, P. P., & Mei, B. (2022). Modeling preservice Chinese-as-a-second/foreign-language teachers’ adoption of educational technology: A technology acceptance perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 816–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International journal of academic research in management (IJARM), 5.

Unaradjan, D. D. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Penerbit Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta.

Vinten, G. (1988). Open vs closed questions - A closed question? Managerial Auditing Journal, 3(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002799

Vo, T. K. A., & Nguyen, H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in language learning: EFL students' perceptions of technology acceptance. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06).

Wahyuningsih, S. (2024). Does artificial intelligence (AI) play roles in enhancing academic writing? Unraveling lecturers’ voices in Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(1), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i1.202436

Wang, X., Li, L., Tan, S. C., Yang, L., & Lei, J. (2023). Preparing for AI-enhanced education: Conceptualizing and empirically examining teachers’ AI readiness. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107798

Wang, Y., Liu, C., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 116–129.

Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, Z., & Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2024). The predicting role of EFL students’ achievement emotions and technological self-efficacy in their technology acceptance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 771–782.

Wardani, N. A., Saefurrohman, S., & Balinas, E. S. (2025). Gamified flipped classroom for teaching EFL productive skills: Exploring teachers’ practices and challenges in an Islamic university. Register Journal, 18(2), 286–318. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v18i2.286-318

Yi, M., & Choi, H. (2023). What drives the acceptance of AI technology?: The role of expectations and experiences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13670.

Yiamkhamnuan, J., & Phuttharak, J. (2020, August 5-7, 2020). Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on students’ learning motivation. The 8th International Conference on Creative Technology, Phetchaburi, Thailand.

Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1871-1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988

AIA Questionnaire
Ethics documents
Instrument Tryout
Proofreading certificate
IMRECS Proofreading

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats