Email this article Evaluating the Quality of Archival Learning Programs Using the CIPP Model: A Case Study at SMK Negeri 9 Semarang
), Tusyanah Tusyanah(3), Mar’atus Sholikah(4), Dyah Ayu Ratnanintyas(5), Zuhdan Kamal Abdillah(6)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(4) Politeknik Balekambang Jepara, Indonesia
(5) SMK Negeri 9 Semarang, Indonesia
(6) SMK Negeri 9 Semarang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpp.v15i1.pp516-538
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Nanda Tyas Wardani, Ismiyati Ismiyati, Tusyanah Tusyanah, Mar’atus Sholikah, Dyah Ayu Ratnanintyas, Zuhdan Kamal Abdillah
Evaluating the Quality of Archival Learning Programs Using the CIPP Model: A Case Study at SMK Negeri 9 Semarang. Objective: This study seeks to examine the evaluation of learning in the independent curriculum by applying the context, input, process, and product models. The Office Management and Business Services expertise program at SMK Negeri 9 Semarang has a subject, namely the sub-element of archive storage procedures, which has used the independent curriculum. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the learning program using the CIPP Model. Methods: This study used a qualitative method design with 11 informants consisting of 2 teachers and 9 students. Furthermore, a content analysis was conducted by analyzing the curriculum content based on the construction of the CIPP model. Findings: In terms of context, archiving is embodied in the elements of archive management and focuses on practice, archiving is important in the Office Management and Business Services skill program, and there is no E-Archive training. Input aspects, teachers prepare teaching modules, students prepare learning materials, learning facilities are not optimal, PBL and PjBL learning models. Process aspect, learning for 3 hours and found obstacles. Product aspect, students practiced archive storage simulation. Conclusion: This study concludes that the implementation of learning the sub-element of archive storage procedures based on the independent curriculum is quite good, so it recommends that further research be carried out in various aspects of education, continuous and comprehensive evaluation, and development of archival learning content.
Keywords: learning evaluation, CIPP model, archives, independent curriculum.
Abdelhadi, A., & Nurunnabi, M. (2018). Engineering student evaluation of teaching quality in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35.
Abdillah, F., Sulton, S., & Husna, A. (2021). Implementasi penilaian autentik dalam kurikulum 2013. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v4i12021p041
Akcanca, N. (2020). 21st Century skills: the predictive role of attitudes regarding stem education and problem-based learning. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.27
Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum for kindergarten using stufflebeam’s CIPP model. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380
Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (R. Damayanti, Ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Arone, A., & Putra, I. (2022). Implementasi aspek psikomotorik dalam pembelajaran PPKn di SMA Negeri 1 Bonjol Kabupaten Pasaman Arnol Arone, Ideal Putra. Journal of Education, Cultural, and Politics, 2, 61–70.
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: a case study cipp model for quality evaluation. Journal of Education and Educational Developement , 5(1), 189–206.
Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: how stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1
Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: preparing students for the new economy. http://www.nccte.com/publications/infosynthesis/index.
Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619
Desyana Qudsy, R., & Puspasari, D. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran kearsipan di SMKN 10 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 8(2), 215–227. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpap
Ermawati, Y., Suprianto, B., & Imam Agung, A. (2024). The influence of material mastery and self efficacy on the practical ability of electronic ignition systems. Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset & Konseptual, 8(3), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v8i3.1028
Ernawati, Y. P. S., Asrowi, & Sukmawati, F. (2024). The future of archives learning with technology: exploring the potential of virtual labs. Journal of Education Technology, 8(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.73815
Fahruddin, F. (2020). Evaluasi program pembelajaran sejarah menggunakan model context, input, process, product (CIPP). HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v8i2.2325
Fertika, D. Y., Sowiyah, S., & Hariri, H. (2022). Procurement and maintenance of facilities and infrastructure in inclusive schools. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences (IJESSS), 2(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v2i2.50
Firman, E., & Dedy Sandiarsa, K. S. (2024). The effect of learning environment on students’ motivation in learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), 10(4), 2656–5862. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v9i1.7614/http
Fitriani, L. M., & Hapsari, A. (2019). The use of nature-based materials as learning media to teach english basic numeracy skills for elementary school students during Kampus Mengajar Program. 340–363.
Gunadi, G., Haryono, H., Purwanti, E., Raya, B. R., Pinoh Barat Melawi, T., & Kalimantan, W. (2022). The analysis of 21 st century learning implementation and competency achievement of junior high school students in 3t regions. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 11(1), 10–18. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujet/article/view/
Haining, K., Hejun, F., Yan, Z., Chunjuan, Z., Chen, Z., & Yajun, H. (2018). Design of teaching quality evaluation model based on fuzzy mathematics and SVM algorithm. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35, 3091–3099. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169663
Katamwatiningsih, S. (2020). Analisis hasil pjj penyusunan rpp dengan evaluasi model cipp di balai diklat keagamaan semarang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 835–842.
Lukman Hakim, A., Barokatul Fajri, M., & Nur Faizah, E. (2022). Evaluation of implementation of mbkm: does academic stress affect on student learning outcomes? International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 16. https://ijersc.org
Mawarsari, N., & Wardani, K. W. (2022). Pengaruh penerapan model problem based learning terhadap kemampuan numerasi pada kurikulum merdeka peserta didik kelas 1 sekolah dasar. JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) (, 5(12), 5461–5465. http://Jiip.stkipyapisdompu.ac.id
Mete, Y. Y., & Daud, M. H. (2023). Use of used materials as learning media in increasing student science process skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3159
Mulyaningsih, I. (2020). Ability of indonesian teachers candidates in preparing a lesson plans. BAHTERA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 19, 218–235. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/bahtera/
Nikmatin Mabsutsah, & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Guru terhadap E Module Berbasis STEAM dan Kurikulum Merdeka pada Materi Pemanasan Global. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 12(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.588
Pazriah, S. I., & Adman. (2020). Penggunaan media pembelajaran mata pelajaran kearsipandalam meningkatkan efektvitas pembelajaran siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 5(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v4i2.18008
Permana, B. S., Saskia Permana, B., Insani, G. N., Reygita, H., & Rustini, T. (2023). Lack of educational facilities and infrastructure in Indonesia. 1076–1080.
Pratama, E., & Meilani, R. I. (2020). Motivasi dan hasil belajar: sebuah studi pada siswa mata pelajaran kearsipan di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 5(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v4i2.18008
Pratiwi, M., Ridwan, & Waskito. (2019). Evaluasi teaching factory model CIPP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3, 414–422.
Pratomo, R., & Shofwan, I. (2022). Implementation of education and training program evaluation. Edukasi, 16, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukasi.v16i2.39863
Primayana, K. H. (2022). Implementasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran bahasa indonesia di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 50–55. https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/cetta
Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga & kesehatan pada smp negeri se-kabupaten mukomuko melalui pendekatan model context, input, process, & product (cipp). Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 6(2), 146–165.
Rifqiyah, F., & Nugraheni, N. (2023). Analisis kesiapan belajar siswa untuk pemenuhan capaian kurikulum merdeka dengan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar (JRPD), 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.30595/jrpd.v4i2.16052
Risna, R. (2023). Analyzing the efficacy of outcome-based education in Kurikulum Merdeka: A literature-based perspective. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 2(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v2i2.59624
Rohmadi, A. (2024). Management of facilities and infrastructure in improving the quality of learning. JELIN: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59373/jelin.v1i2.55
Rokhman, F., Mukhibad, H., Bagas Hapsoro, B., & Nurkhin, A. (2022). E-learning evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic era based on the updated of Delone and McLean information systems success model. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2093490. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2093490
Rosnaeni, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan asesmen pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4341–4350. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1548
Sa’bani, F. (2017). Peningkatan kompetensi guru dalam menyusun rpp melalui kegiatan pelatihan pada MTs Muhammadiyah Wonosari. Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah, 2(1), 13–23.
Santosa, I., & Munawaroh, L. A. (2024). Assessing students’ learning readiness toward student-centered learning. In Journal of English Education and Teaching (Vol. 8, Issue 1).
Selly, A., Molebila, E., Kafelkay, S., & Malese, L. P. (2024). Evaluation of student assessment of the quality of matriculation lecturers of the theology and agribusiness education study program, tribuana kalabahi university. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5, 2019–2032. http://jurnaledukasia.org
Septianingrum, A. D., & Indartono, S. (2019). The implementation of archive learning based on the kurikulum 2013. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v14i1.18755
Sihite, Y., Sihombing, L. N., & Sijabat, D. (2023). Pengaruh lingkungan sekolah terhadap motivasi belajar siswa kelas v sd negeri percontohan. Journal on Education, 6(1), 2905–2914.
Simbolon, R., & Koeswanti, H. D. (2020). Comparison of PBL (project based learning) models with pbl (problem based learning) models to determine student learning outcomes and motivation. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 519–529. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE
Smith, D. J., & Dodovski, I. (2023). Introduction: Realising linguistic, cultural and educational rights through non-territorial autonomy. In D. J. Smith, I. Dodovski, & F. Ghencea (Eds.), Realising Linguistic, Cultural and Educational Rights Through Non-Territorial Autonomy (pp. 1–8). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2004). A note on the purposes, development, and applicability of the joint committee evaluation standards. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400402500107
Sugiyono. (2017). Educational Research Methods (Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches). Alfabeta.
Suklani, S. (2023). Evaluation model and its urgency on elementary education programs. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 1639–1650. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.4201
Suparjan, Haryanto, Murjainah, & Ismiyani, N. (2024). The influence of problem-based learning model to indonesian language primary classrooms: a meta-analysis. Journal of Education Research, 1, 1785–1792.
Suraiya, N., Yusrizal, Y., Majid, M. S. A., Setiawan, D., Hasan, A., & Fata, I. A. (2024). Evaluating integrated social studies learning programs in indonesian middle schools: an application of the stufflebeam model. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5253
Suspito, M. A., Churiyah, M., Arief, M., & Basuki, A. (2023). Peningkatan kemandirian dan hasil belajar siswa tingkat smk menggunakan media pembelajaran genially. Efektor, 10(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v10i2.20156
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome bruner’s theory of education: from early bruner to later bruner. Interchange, 39(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-008-9039-2
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. In Journal of Intelligence (Vol. 11, Issue 3). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Ulla, M. B. (2018). In-service teachers’ training: the case of university teachers in Yangon. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 66–79. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol43/iss1/4Retrievedfromhttp://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol43/iss1/4
Verspoor, A. M. (1992). Planning of education: Where do we go? International Journal of Educational Development, 12(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(92)90048-Q
Wahyuningsih, R., Maryani, I., & Pujiastuti, P. (2022). The effect of university students readiness in online science learning toward learning motivation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 4919–4928. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.821
Warju, W. (2016). Educational program evaluation using cipp model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502
Warnich, Pieter., & Bosch, Chantelle. (2022). Meaningful assessment for 21st century learning. Van Schaik Publishers.
Wulandari, I. G. A. A., Suastra, I. W., & Arnyana, I. B. P. (2022). Evaluation of online learning during the covid 19 pandemic. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42113
Xie, Z., & Su, Z. (2021). Evaluation of college English classroom teaching quality dependent on triangular fuzzy number. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 00207209211002075. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211002075
Yang, Y. (2021). Quality evaluation method of a mathematics teaching model reform based on an improved genetic algorithm. Scientific Programming, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6395349
Yusoff, W. M. W., Hashim, R., Khalid, M., Hussien, S., & Kamalludeen, R. (2018). The impact of hikmah (wisdom) pedagogy on 21st century skills of selected primary and secondary school students in gombak district Selangor Malaysia. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 100. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p100
Yusutria, Fajri, A., Hudatun, E. N., & Febriana, R. (2024). Improving the quality of education through infrastructur in era 5.0. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 158–168.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats