Bibliometric Mapping of Trends in EFL Vocabulary Studies: Performance and Intellectual Structure

Putria Hanindra Sekar Asmarani(1,Mail), Zuliati Rohmah(2), Siti Maftuhah Damio(3) | CountryCountry:


(1) Department of English Language Education, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
(2) Department of English Language Education, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

MailCorresponding Author

Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2025 Putria Hanindra Sekar Asmarani, Zuliati Rohmah

Bibliometric analysis of vocabulary in EFL is limited. This limitation is due to the topic's specificity. Updated bibliographic data on vocabulary in EFL is essential to support future research on the topic, specifically in the context of EFL. This study addressed this gap by conducting a bibliometric analysis of 117 research or review articles sourced from the Scopus database. The data were retrieved using the PRISMA data collection scheme, which was later processed and visualized using Biblioshiny-R and VOSViewer. The analysis focused on trends in annual production (2014-2024), key authors, frequently used keywords, and highly cited documents. The results showed that the annual scientific production from 2014-2024 experienced notable fluctuations, with 2014 being the most productive year (31 documents) and 2017 the least (2 documents). The authorship analysis revealed a relatively small group of recurring contributors, such as Qun Wu, Hifen Lin, and Mark Feng Teng, indicating that although productivity per author was modest, these researchers collectively shaped the direction of EFL vocabulary scholarship. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted “vocabulary,” “vocabulary learning,” and “EFL” as the most dominant terms, showing that research in this field focuses strongly on lexical development within foreign-language contexts. Citation analysis showed that Blasco (2015), Klimova (2021), and Sidek (2015) produced the most influential records centered on cognitive linguistics, mobile learning, and vocabulary relationships. This study updates and systematizes the fragmented landscape of EFL vocabulary research, revealing a clear shift toward technology-mediated, corpus-informed, and cognitively oriented approaches. The findings offer a renewed foundation for future researchers to further develop and expand this field.

 

Keywords: bibliometric analysis, EFL, vocabulary.

Afshar, H. S., Moazzam, I., & Arbabi, H. R. (2014). A comparison of Iranian EAP students and EFL majors on the use of vocabulary learning strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1828-1835.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.612

Afshar, H. S. (2021). Task-related focus-on-forms foreign language vocabulary development: Focus on spoken form and word parts. System, 96, 102406.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102406

Afshar, H. S., & Bagherieh, M. (2014). An evaluation of grammar and vocabulary consciousness-raising activities in current ELT materials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 109–113.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.298

Allal-Sumoto, T., Miyoshi, K., & Mizuhara, H. (2023). The effect of productive vocabulary knowledge on second language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049885.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/te.2015.3.3.002

Andreani, W., & Ying, Y. (2019). "PowPow" interactive game in supporting English vocabulary learning for elementary students. Procedia Computer Science, 157, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.005

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Ashraf, H., Motlagh, F. G., & Salami, M. (2014). The impact of online games on learning English vocabulary by Iranian (low-intermediate) EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.418

Bilican, R., & Yesilbursa, A. A. (2015). Self-regulated capacity for vocabulary learning in Turkish high school students: An experimental study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.393

Binti Robani, R., & Majid, F. A. (2014). Vocabulary learning strategies among Malaysian TEVT students in German-Malaysian Institute (GMI). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1434

Blasco, M. E. (2015). A cognitive linguistic analysis of the cooking domain and its implementation in the EFL classroom as a way of enhancing effective vocabulary teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.149

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1

Can, Y., & Hou, A. Y. C. (2021). Science mapping in the research of higher education internationalisation from 2013 to 2018 in Asia: Publications, regional networking, and future trends. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-11-2020-0048.

Cannon, G. (1988). The Barnhart dictionary of etymology. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, 10(1), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.1988.0010

Chang, J. A., & Chang, C. S. (2023). Games applied to vocabulary learning: A bibliometric analysis on two decades of research. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 60(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202303_60(1).0023.RS.AE

Chawla, M., Panda, S. N., Khullar, V., Garg, K. D., & Angurala, M. (2024). Deep learning based next word prediction aided assistive gaming technology for people with limited vocabulary. Entertainment Computing, 50, 100661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100661

Christian, I. S., Rohmah, Z., & Jalaluddin, I. (2024). Exploring studies on multimodal literacy in English learning: A bibliometric analysis. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(2), 821–848. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i2.3681.

Cooper, H. (2015). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IVhDCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&ots=xbkvBUn3VM&dq=Research%20synthesis%20and%20meta-analysis%3A%20A%20step-by-step%20approach&lr&pg=PA61#v=twopage&q&f=false

Cristea, S. L., & Fărcaşiu, M. (2015). Investigating Romanian EFL students’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of vocabulary activities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1403-1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.548

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Elgort, I. (2018). Technology-mediated second language vocabulary development: A review of trends in research methodology. Calico Journal, 35(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.34554

Elsevier. (2023). Scopus content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com

Fei, X., Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Ganapathy, M. N. (2024). Bibliometric evaluation of publications on second language vocabulary acquisition (2000-2024). Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 45, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.10

Feng, D. (2025). A critical bibliometric review of technology-enhanced vocabulary learning: Uncovering a decade of tensions and trends. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251393196. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251393196

Haoming, L., & Wei, W. (2024). A systematic review on vocabulary learning in AR and VR gamification context. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100057

He, M., Lin, T., Wu, X., Luo, J., & Peng, Y. (2020). A systematic literature review of reverse logistics of end-of-life vehicles: Bibliometric analysis and research trend. Energies, 13(21), 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215586

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Salholz-Hillel, M., Boyack, K. W., & Baas, J. (2020). The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature. Royal Society Open Science, 7(11), 201532. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210389

Khairati, F. (2024). Online game to improve English vocabulary: A bibliometric analysis. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 4(4), 153-163. https://www.nusantarahasanajournal.com/index.php/nhj/article/download/1235/1048

Klimova, B. (2021). Evaluating impact of mobile applications on EFL university learners’ vocabulary learning–A review study. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.108

Kuo, F. R., Hsu, C. C., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention, and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003

Liberman, A., & Mitchell, J. L. (1993). An analytic dictionary of English etymology. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 5(1), 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1040820700001013

Lee, P., & Lin, H. (2019). The effect of the inductive and deductive data-driven learning (DDL) on vocabulary acquisition and retention. System, 81, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.011

Lin, H. (2015). Effectiveness of interactivity in a web-based simulation game on foreign language vocabulary learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.772

Lin, V., Yeh, H. C., Huang, H. H., & Chen, N. S. (2022). Enhancing EFL vocabulary learning with multimodal cues supported by an educational robot and an IoT-Based 3D book. System, 104, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102691

Lu, C., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2022). Vocabulary in EAP learning materials: What can we learn from teachers, learners, and corpora?. System, 106, 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102791

Nation, I. S. P. (2011). Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000267

Mammola, S., Fontaneto, D., Martínez, A., & Chichorro, F. (2020). Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations. Scientometrics, 126, 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0.

Meara, P. M. (1983). Vocabulary in a second language. Specialised bibliography 3 [Covering 1960-1980.]. Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, Regent's College, Inner Circle, Regent's Park, London NW1 4NS, England (6.95 British pounds). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED349797.pdf

Mediha, N., & Enisa, M. (2014). A comparative study on the effectiveness of using traditional and contextualized methods for enhancing learners’ vocabulary knowledge in an EFL classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3443–3448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.780

Mishra, V., & Mishra, M. P. (2023). PRISMA for review of management literature–method, merits, and limitations–an academic review. Advancing Methodologies of Conducting Literature Review in Management Domain, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Mohd Zainol, S.N.H., Yaacob, A., Shaik Abdullah, S. et al. Connecting the dots: bibliometric trends in vocabulary teaching and technology. Discov Educ 4, 497 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00853-4

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Page, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews–do they ‘work’in informing decision-making around health inequalities?. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 3(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133108004453

Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). 'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58(3), 2357–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Shahriarpour, N. (2014). On the effect of playing digital games on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ motivation toward learning English vocabularies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1738-1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.601

Sidek, H. M., & Rahim, H. A. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046

Sohrabi, C., Franchi, T., Mathew, G., Kerwan, A., Nicola, M., Griffin, M., ... & Agha, R. (2021). PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105918

Soleimani, H., Rahmanian, M., & Sajedi, K. (2015). A revisit to vocabulary acquisition in involvement load hypothesis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.055

Soleimani, H., & Esmaeili, M. M. (2014). Explicit instruction of context-embedded hyperlinked thematic words and vocabulary recall. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1794-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.608

Sun, Y., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2020). Vocabulary in high-school EFL textbooks: Texts and learner knowledge. System, 93, 102279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102279

Teng, M. F. (2022). Incidental L2 vocabulary learning from viewing captioned videos: Effects of learner-related factors. System, 105, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102736

Teng, M. F. (2024). Working memory and prior vocabulary knowledge in incidental vocabulary learning from listening, reading, reading-while-listening, and viewing captioned videos. System, 124, 103381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103381

Teng, M. F., Mizumoto, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2024). Understanding growth mindset, self-regulated vocabulary learning, and vocabulary knowledge. System, 122, 103255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103255

Tseng, W. T. (2016). Measuring English vocabulary size via computerized adaptive testing. Computers & Education, 97, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.018

Tseng, W. T., Liou, H. J., & Chu, H. C. (2020). Vocabulary learning in virtual environments: Learner autonomy and collaboration. System, 88, 102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102190

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden.

https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.20.pdf

Vela, V. (2015). Using glosses for incidental vocabulary acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.551

Vela, V., & Rushidi, J. (2016). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition and learner autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.046

What is the difference between ScienceDirect and Scopus data? | Data as a Service Support Center. (n.d.). https://www.elsevier.support/dataasaservice/answer/what-is-the-difference-between-sciencedirect-and-scopus-data

Wu, Q. (2014). A rote strategy in memorizing vocabulary for ESL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.408

Wu, Q. (2014). Learning ESL vocabulary with smartphones. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.409

Wu, Q. (2015). Designing a smartphone app to teach English (L2) vocabulary. Computers & Education, 85, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.013

Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students' English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety, and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103808

Yılmaz, E., & Soruç, A. (2015). The use of concordance for teaching vocabulary: A data-driven learning approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2626-2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.400

Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Cheng, G. (2023). Learner engagement in digital game-based vocabulary learning and its effects on EFL vocabulary development. System, 119, 103173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103173

Supplementary Files

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats