Determinants of Private University Choice in Banten: The Role of Institutional Reputation and Location

Bambang Mardi Sentosa(1), Ajeng Pradesti(2), Khusaini Khusaini(3,Mail) | CountryCountry:


(1) Department of Management, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Indonesia
(2) Department of Communication Science, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Indonesia
(3) Master of Administration Science, Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

DOI 10.23960/jpp.v15i3.pp2089-2113
Metrics→
              
Indexing Site→


Download Full Text: PDF

Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Mardisentosa, Ajeng Pradesti, Khusaini Khusaini


Determinants of Private University Choice in Banten: The Role of Institutional Reputation and Location. Objectives: Accurately selecting a university can significantly impact one’s future, including career prospects, job market oportunities, and overall well-being. Previous findings have been debated among researchers regarding the relationship between gender, a university's reputation, location, and tuition fees with university choice. However, studies in the context of private universities in Banten, such as Syekh Yusuf Islamic University (UNIS), are limited and require further research. This study aims to examine the influence of gender, reputation, location, and tuition fees on students' choice of UNIS. Methods: This study utilized a quantitative approach and a binary logistic regression model. The sample size was 937 participants. A validated online Google Forms questionnaire was distributed through WhatsApp groups to collect the data. Findings: The results of the binary logit analysis showed that university reputation and location had a significant influence on the selection of UNIS. Reputation increased students' chances of choosing UNIS, as did a strategic campus location. Conversely, neither gender nor tuition fees were found to influence students' decisions to choose UNIS. These findings confirmed that campus reputation and accessibility are the primary factors influencing students’ choice of UNIS.  Conclusion: The findings of this study provide empirical evidence that UNIS needs to prioritize strengthening its academic reputation as a key factor in attracting prospective students. To address this, improving faculty quality, pursuing program accreditation, and collaborating with industry are strategic steps to strengthen the institution's image. Additionally, its strategic location must be continually optimized through enhanced accessibility and transportation infrastructure, which further supports student recruitment. While tuition fees have not proven to be a significant barrier, maintaining a transparent fee policy and offering scholarships remains necessary to stay competitive. In summary, focusing on both reputation and accessibility will strengthen UNIS's position as a leading private university in Banten.

 

Keywords: gender, location, reputation, tuition fees, university choice.


Acar, E. (2024). Exploring the decision-making process of international students: Factors influencing their choice of US colleges. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(4), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/2273

Adefulu, A., Farinloye, T., & Mogaji, E. (2020). Factors influencing postgraduate students’ university choice in nigeria. In E. Mogaji, Pf. Maringe, & R. E. Hinson (Eds.), Higher Education Marketing in Africa: Explorations into Student Choice (pp. 83–106). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39379-3_8

Ahmad, S. Z., & Hussain, M. (2017). An investigation of the factors determining student destination choice for higher education in the United Arab Emirates. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1099622

Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004406155

Asaad, M., Zayegh, O., Badawi, J., Hmidi, Z. S., Alhamid, A., Tarzi, M., & Agha, S. (2020). Gender differences in specialty preference among medical Students at Aleppo University: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02081-w

Ashiru, F., Whitfield, I., & Warwick, P. (2022). Business school capital and study choices in undergraduate education: A student-centred approach. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100633

Baliyan, S. P., & Mokoena, S. (2024). Students’ choice management: recipe for improving enrollment in private higher education institutions. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V20I1.26030

Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Ong, A. K. S., Chuenyindee, T., Yuduang, N., Kusonwattana, P., … Buaphiban, T. (2022). How important is the tuition fee during the COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country? Evaluation of Filipinos’ preferences on public university attributes using conjoint analysis. Heliyon, 8(11), e11205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11205

Bonneau, C., & Grobon, S. (2025). Parental income and higher education: Evidence from France. Journal of Human Capital, Accepted, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/735104

Boring, A., & Brown, J. (2024). Gender and choices in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 99(April), 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102521

BPS Provinsi Banten. (2023). Provinsi banten dalam angka 2023 [Banten province in figures 2023]. In A. Simbolon (Ed.), Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Banten. Banten: Retrieved from https://banten.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/482ee839483674f34dd96faf/provinsi-banten-dalam-angka-2023.html

Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004333

Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2020). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: an intergenerational perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 711–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz042.Advance

Collazos-Ortiz, M. A., Barrera-Duque, E., Areiza-Padilla, J. A., Barajas-Portas, K., & Veas-González, I. (2025). Religious brand credibility: the impact of catholic branding on the choice of business schools in Colombia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2552357

Constantinides, E., & Stagno, M. C. Z. (2012). Higher education marketing: A Study on the impact of social media on study selection and university choice. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing, 2(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtem.2012010104

de Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898

Denessen, E., Geert, D., & Sleegers, P. (2005). Segregation by choice? A study of group‐specific reasons for school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108981

Dorsey, E. R., Jarjoura, D., & Rutecki, G. W. (2003). Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA, 290(9), 1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1173

Eldegwy, A., Elsharnouby, T. H., & Kortam, W. (2024). Like father, like son: the role of similar-education parents in their children’s university choice. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(2), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.2018087

Fadhli, M., Salabi, A. S., Siregar, F. A., Lubis, H., & Sahudra, T. M. (2023). Higher education marketing strategy: Comparative study of state Islamic higher education institutions and state higher education institutions. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(3), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.896

Farías, M., & Sevilla, M. P. (2015). Effectiveness of vocational high schools in students’ access to and persistence in postsecondary vocational education. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 693–718. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24572051

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariat dengan prgram IBM SPSS 23 [Multivariate Analysis Application with IBM SPSS 23 Program] (Ketujuh [Seventh]; P. P. Harto, Ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Gille, M., Moulignier, R., & Kövesi, K. (2022). Understanding the factors influencing students’ choice of engineering school. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1993795

Guilford, J. P. (1957). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (41st ed.). New York: McGraw‐Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730410357

Hai, N. C., Thanh, N. H., Chau, T. M., Van Sang, T., & Dong, V. H. (2023). Factors affecting the decision to choose a university of high school students: A study in An Giang Province, Vietnam. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22971

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664

Heathcote, D., Savage, S., & Hosseinian-Far, A. (2020). Factors affecting university choice behaviour in the UK higher education. Education Sciences, Vol. 10, p. 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080199

Hemsley‐Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011031565

Heng, H. K., Wang, R. X., Yeap, C. K., Ithnan, I. H. M., Abidin, I. S. binti Z., & Lai, P. Y. (2024). Breaking barriers: exploring the gender moderation in factors affecting university choice for students. In N. Mansour & L. Bujosa (Eds.), Islamic Finance: New Trends in Law and Regulation (pp. 345–357). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_28

Hosmer, D. W., Lameshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression analysis (3rd ed.; D. J. Balding, N. A. C. Cressie, G. M. Fitzmaurice, H. Goldstein, J. I. M., G. Molenberghs, … S. Weisberg, Eds.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

İlgan, A., Ataman, O., Uğurlu, F., & Yurdunkulu, A. (2018). Factors affecting university choice: A study on university freshman students. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 46(December), 199–216.

Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2017). Annual report data book 2017. Tokyo. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/annual/2017/c8h0vm0000bws721-att/2017_data_all.pdf

Juhaidi, A. (2024). University choice factors: a case of two types of higher education in the third-largest island in the world. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2367731. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367731

Juhaidi, A., Fitria, A., Hidayati, N., & Saputri, R. A. (2025). Examining factors influencing enrolment intention in Islamic higher education in Indonesia, does Islamic senior high school matter? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11(December 2024), 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101243

Juhaidi, A., Fuady, M. N., Ramadan, W., & Ma’ruf, H. (2024). Instagram activities, engagement, and enrollment intention in Indonesia: A case in the third largest island in the world. Nurture, 18(2), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v18i2.642

Juhaidi, A., Ma’ruf, H., Tajudin, A., Fitri, S., & Hamdani, H. (2023). The perceived utility and university enrolment intention in Indonesia: Students' perspective. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 21(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v21i2.7364

Kayombo, K. M., & Carter, S. (2016). Understanding student preferences for university choice in Zambia. Journal of Education Policy, Planning & Administration, 6(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12127.00166

Kethüda, Ö. (2024). Evaluating the influence of university ranking on the credibility and perceived differentiation of university brands. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(2), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2059733

Kholis, N., & Kartika, M. (2016). Factors influenced people in choosing university: a lesson from islamic economics department UII. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 15(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol15.iss1.art3

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (Second). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd. Retrieved from www.newagepublishers.com

Krippendorff, K. (2011). Systematic disagreement Sampling errors Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability (pp. 1–10). pp. 1–10. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2021-03/Computing Krippendorff%27s Alpha-Reliability.pdf

Kusumawati, A. (2018). Perilaku konsumen dan pemasaran pendidikan tinggi [Consumer behavior and higher education marketing]. Surabaya: Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Latief, H. (2022). The masyumi networks and the proliferation of Islamic higher education in Indonesia (1945-1965). Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, 178(4), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10043

Lavy, V. (2024). The short- and the long-run impact of gender-biased teachers. 179241. Retrieved from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.20210052

Le, H. Q. (2020). Factors affecting students’ decision to select private universities in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO4.235

Le, T. D., Le, N. V., Nguyen, T. T., Tran, K. T., & Hoang, H. Q. (2022). Choice factors when Vietnamese high school students consider universities: A mixed method approach. Education Sciences, 12(11), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110779

Le, T. D., Robinson, L. J., & Dobele, A. R. (2020). Understanding high school students use of choice factors and word-of-mouth information sources in university selection. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564259

Le, D. Van, & Tran, T. Q. (2024). Economic growth and quality of education: Evidence from the national high school exam in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102947

Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/yelo2332

Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375

Loo, J. T. K., Leong, C. L. P., Siew, M. L., & Ahmadpour, S. (2024). Determinants of students’ intention of choice to study at higher education institutions of Malaysia in the COVID-19 era. International Journal of Management in Education, 18(5), 481–514. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2024.140900

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 362–386. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/nursingresearchonline/fulltext/1986/11000/determination_and_quantification_of_content.17.aspx

Mandic, S., Sandretto, S., Hopkins, D., Wilson, G., Kidd, G., & García Bengoechea, E. (2023). School choice, distance to school, and travel to school patterns among adolescents. Journal of Transport and Health, 33(May), 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101704

Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683711

Minor, R. (2023). How tuition fees affected student enrollment at higher education institutions: the aftermath of a German quasi-experiment. Journal for Labour Market Research, 57(28), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00354-7

Mogaji, E. (2019). Types and Location of Nigerian Universities. Research Agenda Working Papers, 7, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.9722618.v1

Mourad, M. (2011). Role of brand related factors in influencing students’ choice in Higher Education (HE) market. International Journal of Management in Education, 5(2–3), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2011.039488

Mulyono, H., & Hadian, A. (2019). Factors affecting on rational choice of students in Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.692

Muslim, A. B., Imperiani, E., Musthafa, B., Farlian, T., & Francisco, A. (2025). Enhancing international student motivations in Indonesian universities: building academic reputation in the Global South. Globalisation, Societies and Education, Latest Art, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2439420

Mustafa, S. A.-A., Sellami, A. L., Elmaghraby, E. A. A., & Al-Qassass, H. B. (2018). Determinants of college and university choice for high-school students in Qatar. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n3p1

Najimudinova, S., İsmailova, R., & Oskonbaeva, Z. (2022). What defines the university choice? The case of higher education in Kyrgyzstan. Sosyoekonomi, 30(54), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.04.03

Naveed, S., & Khurshid, M. (2020). Factors influencing the university choice decision of business students at higher education level: A case from Pakistan. Hamdard Islamicus, 43(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v43i2.46

Navratilova, T. (2013). Analysis and comparison of factors influencing university choice. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(3), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2013.03.07

Nofrizal, Juju, U., & Aznuriyandi. (2024). Finding reasons to choose a campus: The impact of social media and brand strategy. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(3), 988–1015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12495

Nuseir, M. T., & El Refae, G. A. (2022). Factors influencing the choice of studying at UAE universities: an empirical research on the adoption of educational marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(2), 215–237.

Othman, M. H., Mohamad, N., & Barom, M. N. (2019). Students’ decision-making in class selection and enrolment. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2017-0143

Padlee, S. F., Kamaruddin, A. R., & Baharun, R. (2010). International students’ choice behavior for higher education at Malaysian private universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(2), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v2n2p202

Panigrahi, J. (2022). Financing of Private Higher Education Institutions in India. In N. V. Varghese & J. Panigrahi (Eds.), India Higher Education Report 2021 (1st ed., pp. 1–15). New Delhi: Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298724

Papp, I. C., Karácsony, P., & Juhász, T. (2023). Study preferences in higher education. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 20(4), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.4.2023.4.13

Paschal, M. J., & Mkulu, D. G. (2020). Online classes during COVID-19 pandemic in higher learning institutions in Africa. Global Research in Higher Education, 3(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v3n3p1

Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Geographies of educational mobilities: exploring the uneven flows of international students. The Geographical Journal, 180(3), 246–259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43868611

Philipp, J. (2023). Gendered university major choice: the role of intergenerational transmission. Journal of Population Economics, 36(2), 1049–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-022-00900-6

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in Social Science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Porter, C., & Serra, D. (2020). Gender differences in the choice of major: The importance of female role models. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(3), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180426

Pramesti, H. P. (2024). Analisis determinan pemilihan perguruan tinggi swasta oleh mahasiswa universitas islam indonesia [Analysis of Determinants of Private University Selection by Students islamic university of indonesia]. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/52318

Qasim, A. M., Pirshing Salih Mohamad, A. A., Hiba K., M., & Ayoubi, R. M. (2021). Student university choice in Kurdistan-Iraq: what factors matter? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1742298

Redekopp, D. E. (2017). Irrational career decision-making: connecting behavioural economics and career development*. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(4), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2016.1264569

Sakdiah, H. (2018). Factors influencing the students’ interest in continuing their education to university. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 8(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v8.i2.201809

Sarofim, S., Minton, E., Hunting, A., Bartholomew, D. E., Zehra, S., Montford, W., … Paul, P. (2020). Religion’s influence on the financial well-being of consumers: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(3), 1028–1061. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12315

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (7th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

Sexton, M. (2022). Convenience sampling and student workers: Ethical and methodological considerations for academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(4), 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102539

Simanjuntak, O. D. P., Zainuddin, Toni, N., Faris, S., Matondang, S., & Dalimunthe, M. I. (2024). A marketing mix perspective as antecedents of students’ decisions: Evidence from five universities in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 25(199), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.199.08

Stoll, G., Rieger, S., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Rounds, J. (2021). Stability and change in vocational interests after graduation from high school: A six-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 120, pp. 1091–1116. Stoll, Gundula: Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tubingen, Europastr. 6, Tubingen, Germany, 72072, gundula.stoll@uni-tuebingen.de: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000359

Suen, L.-J. W., Huang, H.-M., & Lee, H.-H. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. The journal of nursing, 61(3), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative and R&D research methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tamrat, W. (2018). Private higher education in Africa: Old realities and emerging trends. International Journal of African Higher Education, 4(2), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v4i2.10295

Thaler, B. (2025). The impact of prior education on student success in higher education: how do different school types influence success in different fields of study? European Journal of Higher Education, 8235, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2025.2462119

Trivedi, P., Patel, M., Patel, Y., Bhatt, D., Jayswal, H., Dubey, N., & Solanki, R. (2025). From campus life to career prospects: analyzing key determinants in student university selection. In M. S. Kaiser, J. Xie, & V. S. Rathore (Eds.), Intelligent Strategies for ICT (pp. 339–350). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Triyono, T., Dasmadi, D., & Ariestanto-TNK, A. F. (2021). Pengaruh promosi, biaya, fasilitas, akreditasi, dan lokasi Universitas Boyolali terhadap minat calon mahasiswa baru [The influence of promotion, costs, facilities, accreditation, and location of Boyolali University on the interest of prospective new students]. EKOBIS: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 9(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.36596/ekobis.v9i2.460

Tyrer, S., & Heyman, B. (2016). Sampling in epidemiological research: issues, hazards and pitfalls. BJPsych Bulletin, 40(2), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.050203

Vortisch, A. B. (2024). The land of the fee: the effect of Baden-Württemberg’s tuition fees on international student outcomes. Education Economics, 32(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2023.2194585

Vuong, B. H., Chi, H. K., Liu, Y. Y., Luc, D. A., & Yuan, S. F. (2024). ehe moderating effect of policies on student’s attractiveness in electing future higher education institution: An analysis in South of Vietnam. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 12(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-2-295-315

Walsh, C., Moorhouse, J., Dunnett, A., & Barry, C. (2015). University choice: which attributes matter when you are paying the full price? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 670–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12178

Wickneswary, N., Senathirajah, A. R. B. S., Haque, R., Udang, L. N., Osman, Z., Al-Ainati, S., … Ramasamy, G. (2024). Factors influencing college students’ educational enrolment choice in private higher education institutions in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Kurdish Studies, 12(2), 3674–3693. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i2.274

Winton, B. G., & Sabol, M. A. (2022). A multi-group analysis of convenience samples: free, cheap, friendly, and fancy sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1961187

Wooldridge, J. M. (2018). Introductory Econometrics (Seventh). Boston: Cengage Learning, Inc.

Wut, T. M., Xu, J., & Lee, S. W. (2022). Does university ranking matter? Choosing a university in the digital era. Education Sciences, 12(4), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040229

Xie, X., Li, D., & Jung, J. (2024). Cross- border university choice in china’s greater bay area. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(4), e12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12531


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats