<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id/lib/pkp/xml/oai2.xsl" ?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
		http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
	<responseDate>2026-04-28T21:02:25Z</responseDate>
	<request identifier="oai:ojs.jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id:article/349" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpp/oai</request>
	<GetRecord>
		<record>
			<header>
				<identifier>oai:ojs.jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id:article/349</identifier>
				<datestamp>2025-04-25T09:09:02Z</datestamp>
				<setSpec>jpp:ART</setSpec>
				<setSpec>driver</setSpec>
			</header>
			<metadata>
<oai_dc:dc
	xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
	http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Assessing Pre-service Mathematics Education Teachers Deductive Reasoning via Proof Writing in Basic Geometry: The Power of SOLO Taxonomy</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Gagani, Ray Ferdinand</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Assessing Pre-service Mathematics Education Teachers Deductive Reasoning via Proof Writing in Basic Geometry: The Power of SOLO Taxonomy. Objectives: This study characterizes the developmental patterns of deductive reasoning via proof-writing of pre-service mathematics education teachers using the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. Methods: One hundred three pre-service teachers were given twelve items involving basic concepts of plane geometry to assess. An in-depth analysis of their proof was done and they were grouped through a two-step clustering technique. Findings: Four compatible levels of developmental pattern to the SOLO level were detected. At level 0, students do not know how to establish proof. At level 1, students provided a single or few valid idea/s. Students demonstrating level 2 thinking provided many true ideas. However, the proofs are unclear and illogical. Level 3 students' proof is precisely logical. Conclusion: A trend of difficulty and success characterizes their deductive reasoning and indicates that those who were not successful in a task have superficial conceptual geometry knowledge. The research concluded that the SOLO taxonomy is a precise framework for conceptual knowledge assessment and that knowledge indeed has structure. The use of the SOLO taxonomy for assessment activity is recommended. Keywords: assessment, deductive reasoning, proof writing, solo taxonomy.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i3.202307</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">FKIP Universitas Lampung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2025-04-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/349</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif; Vol 13, No 3 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif; 979-996</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2550-1313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-9849</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jpp.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/349/213</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Ray Ferdinand Gagani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
			</metadata>
		</record>
	</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
